Re: [Libreoffice] cannot build with ATL, cannot build without

Hi Regina I'm using Visual Studio 2008 Express Edition and my configure parameters are: $ ./configure --without-junit --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/Components/apache-ant-1.8.0/ --disable-mozilla --disable-activex-component Thanks, Noel. Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Noel, > > Noel Grandin schrieb:

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: i18npool/inc i18npool/Library_localedata_euro.mk i18npool/source svtools/source

Hi Eike, Thanks for the explanation and the correction. I misinterpreted the meaning. Best regards, Juan Pablo El 06/09/2011 2:22, Eike Rathke escribió: Hi Juan, On Monday, 2011-09-05 23:03:04 +0200, Juan Pablo Martínez Cortés wrote: Yes, they were intentional. At least, I copied the wa

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Michael Meeks wrote (01-09-11 16:55) * Agenda items + request to move 3.5.x feature-freeze forward (Cor) So thanks for putting this at the agenda. (But of course note that it is not stated fully correct.) As you have seen, I posted some overview on the subject to the list two days ag

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 40571, which changed state. Bug 40571 Summary: UI EDITING Crash when modifying defined name https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40571 What|Old Value |New Value --

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] [PUSHED] cherry-pick to 3-4: crash when modifying a defined name (and other places as well)

Looks good to me and pushed to 3-4 with my sign-off. 2011/9/6 Eike Rathke > Hi, > > On Tuesday, 2011-09-06 01:41:06 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > > fixes nasty crashers when modifying defined names > > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=792dee46f2b35a21167af182416803c0b80b

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: i18npool/inc i18npool/Library_localedata_euro.mk i18npool/source svtools/source

Hi Juan, On Monday, 2011-09-05 23:03:04 +0200, Juan Pablo Martínez Cortés wrote: > Yes, they were intentional. At least, I copied the way it was done > in other languages of Spain, see for instance > http://www.it46.se/localegen/locale/1207308973_es_ES.xml . The generated data files are not al

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] cherry-pick to 3-4: crash when modifying a defined name (and other places as well)

Hi, On Tuesday, 2011-09-06 01:41:06 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > fixes nasty crashers when modifying defined names > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=792dee46f2b35a21167af182416803c0b80b517c Forgot to mention: should fix https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40571

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] cherry-pick to 3-4: crash when modifying a defined name (and other places as well)

Hi, fixes nasty crashers when modifying defined names http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=792dee46f2b35a21167af182416803c0b80b517c Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D0

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen.sh demands "Mozilla build tooling" although building Mozilla is disabled

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > Norbert Thiebaud schrieb: >> >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Regina Henschel >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I then follow >>> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies >>> and load the z

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Speed up range name lookup from formula interpreter

Hi Kohei, On Sunday, 2011-09-04 20:09:30 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Sounds good. So, do you think that these two commits combined (my > original and your fix) would be safe enough to be backported to the > stable (3.4) branch, or ...? What's your opinion? Pushed to 3-4 http://cgit.freedeskt

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen.sh demands "Mozilla build tooling" although building Mozilla is disabled

Hi Norbert, Norbert Thiebaud schrieb: On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, I then follow http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies and load the zips from http://tools.openoffice.org/moz_prebuild/OOo3.2 (shouldn't the binaries copied to

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen.sh demands "Mozilla build tooling" although building Mozilla is disabled

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi all, > > I then follow > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies > and load the zips from http://tools.openoffice.org/moz_prebuild/OOo3.2 > (shouldn't the binaries copied to another place. OpenOffice.org

Re: [Libreoffice] warning about ccache in configure.log

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Norbert, > >> >> PS out of curiosity could you show me what >> >> which ccache > > /usr/bin/ccache > >> >> and >> >> ccache -s >> >> display on your cygwin ? >> > > cache directory                     C:\\Dokumente und > Einstellungen\ppp

[Libreoffice] Autogen.sh demands "Mozilla build tooling" although building Mozilla is disabled

Hi all, I'm try to find out, what parameter to autogen.sh are really needed for a build with Cygwin and Visual Studio Express. So I start with a pure ./autogen.sh Now a real stop with error message: checking which Mozilla to use... internal checking for toolkit Mozilla should use... checking

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: i18npool/inc i18npool/Library_localedata_euro.mk i18npool/source svtools/source

Yes, they were intentional. At least, I copied the way it was done in other languages of Spain, see for instance http://www.it46.se/localegen/locale/1207308973_es_ES.xml . I guess the reason of changing the type is that in Spanish, as well as in other languages of Spain, the double quotation m

Re: [Libreoffice] warning about ccache in configure.log

Hi Norbert, PS out of curiosity could you show me what which ccache /usr/bin/ccache and ccache -s display on your cygwin ? cache directory C:\\Dokumente und Einstellungen\pppregin/.ccache cache hit 0 cache miss

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: i18npool/inc i18npool/Library_localedata_euro.mk i18npool/source svtools/source

Hi Eike, 2011/9/4 Eike Rathke : > Hi Andras, > > On Saturday, 2011-09-03 02:34:32 -0700, Andras Timar wrote: > >>  i18npool/source/localedata/data/an_ES.xml |  358 >> ++ >> >>     add an_ES (Aragonese) locale data > > Compiling that gave: > >    Warning: Time100SecSepa

Re: [Libreoffice] warning about ccache in configure.log

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm try to find out, what parameter to autogen.sh are really needed for a > build with Cygwin and Visual Studio Express. So I start with a pure > ./autogen.sh > > I get the warning > configure:6733: WARNING: ccache's cache size

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Speed up range name lookup from formula interpreter

Hi Kohei, On Sunday, 2011-09-04 20:09:30 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > I didn't test with any Excel document yet to verify. Actually > > I currently have zero original Excel documents ;) I'll have to copy the > > testcase farm of the old OOo tree Daniel used to maintain [should do > > that whil

Re: [Libreoffice] In config.log: conftest.c(42) : fatal error C1083:

On 05.09.2011 20:25, Regina Henschel wrote: > I see the following error in config.log > conftest.c(42) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: > 'valgrind.h': No such file or directory > > The output itself gives only > checking valgrind.h usability... no > checking valgrind.h presence...

Re: [Libreoffice] In config.log: conftest.c(42) : fatal error C1083:

On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:25:32 +0200 Regina Henschel wrote: > I wonder about the term "fatal error". Well, configure tested if it could use valgrind or if that would result in a fatal error. It tried and resolved to the second possibility. Best, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michael

Re: [Libreoffice] warning about ccache in configure.log

On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:56:56 +0200 Regina Henschel wrote: > I get the warning > configure:6733: WARNING: ccache's cache size is less than 1GB using > it is counter-producive: Disabling auto-ccache detection > > What does it mean? Is there some setting I have missed? Using ccache for LO makes on

[Libreoffice] In config.log: conftest.c(42) : fatal error C1083:

Hi all, I'm try to find out, what parameter to autogen.sh are really needed for a build with Cygwin and Visual Studio Express. So I start with a pure ./autogen.sh I see the following error in config.log conftest.c(42) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'valgrind.h': No such file

[Libreoffice] warning about ccache in configure.log

Hi all, I'm try to find out, what parameter to autogen.sh are really needed for a build with Cygwin and Visual Studio Express. So I start with a pure ./autogen.sh I get the warning configure:6733: WARNING: ccache's cache size is less than 1GB using it is counter-producive: Disabling auto-cca

Re: [Libreoffice] Additional info (was: Re: [PUSHED] "thereof" should be translated to modern English)

Hi Lior! Thanks for your lightning fast reply ... Am Montag, den 05.09.2011, 19:51 +0300 schrieb Lior Kaplan: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Christoph Noack > wrote: > > > Looks reasonable to me. Pushed now to master. [...] > @ Lior: Do you think the proposal by Liz

Re: [Libreoffice] 3.5 release from QA to point-zero

Hi Kohei, Kohei Yoshida wrote (05-09-11 02:50) On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: - How much time can one annoying bug ask? Two day, two weeks? e.g. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40466#c10 Hmm... I don't see the relevance of my comment in the bug to what you

Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing

Hi Kohei, On Monday, 2011-09-05 12:33:31 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > Yes, that would indeed be needed. Probably also import/export from/to > > Excel needs new row-height calculation, as they specify row height in > > fractions of font height, IIRC. > > Well, for the import of Excel binary do

Re: [Libreoffice] Additional info (was: Re: [PUSHED] "thereof" should be translated to modern English)

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Christoph Noack wrote: > > > Looks reasonable to me. Pushed now to master. > > When working on the printing topic, we've did several string review > iterations for the new dialog. For English, Liz was so kind to support > me (Liz is the author of the OOo terminology

[Libreoffice] development summary: year 2011, week 35

Hi, this time a brief summary of what happened during the 35th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:LO-3.5 development + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for LO-3.3.5 bug fix release + libreoffice-3-4: fixes for LO-3.4.4 bug fix

Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing

Hi Eike, On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Eike Rathke wrote: >> But based on what I'm seeing on this thread, I take that the new glyph >> metric calculation algorithm is the correct way?  If so, then we'll have >> to make some adjustments to some of the size sensitive areas to bring >> things bac

[Libreoffice] Additional info (was: Re: [PUSHED] "thereof" should be translated to modern English)

Hey Caolán, hi Lior! I just noticed this discussion, so here some additional remarks. Cool, it seems you've addressed one of my ancient "undecided" items ;-) Am Montag, den 05.09.2011, 14:33 +0100 schrieb Caolán McNamara: > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 13:10 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > The calc print

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #199 from vitriol 2011-09-05 09:18:55 PDT --- (In reply to comment #198) > agree 36662 for removal - purely cosmetic and debatable. It's not only cosmetic... see comment 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpr

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #198 from Michael Meeks 2011-09-05 09:12:23 PDT --- agree 36662 for removal - purely cosmetic and debatable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --

Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing

Hi Caolán, On Monday, 2011-09-05 13:59:16 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 01:22 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 02:39:37PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > > > But before going there, I just need to make sure that we are on the same > > > > page wrt keepi

Re: [Libreoffice] cannot build with ATL, cannot build without

Spoke too soon, build still breaking. Sigh. Noel Grandin wrote: > In desperation, I managed to solve this by doing > > export DISABLE_ATL=TRUE > export DISABLE_ACTIVEX=TRUE > > But why does configure not automatically set those variables, since I > specified --disable-atl and --disable-activex on

Re: [Libreoffice] cannot build with ATL, cannot build without

In desperation, I managed to solve this by doing export DISABLE_ATL=TRUE export DISABLE_ACTIVEX=TRUE But why does configure not automatically set those variables, since I specified --disable-atl and --disable-activex on the configure command line? Thanks, Noel Noel Grandin wrote: > Hi > > I'm

Re: [Libreoffice] Mailing list content filter (was: Re: (no subject))

Eike Rathke wrote: > There's a bunch at > http://antivirus.about.com/od/securitytips/a/fileextview.htm > Updated, thx for the ptr. -- Thorsten pgpL6CdIQhQls.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Thanks for a fantastic Hackfest!

Hi This is indeed a terrific achievement. Congratulations to you Florian. To all participants, a big thank you. I hope it was enjoying. Special tanks to the cook (hopefully Italo didn't exercise his grappa tasting skills, it could have messed a lot with the boys'n girls hacking will) Special t

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for MarkManager

Hi Christoph, On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:05:32 +0200 Christoph Lutz wrote: > this is a patch we wrote during the libreoffice hackfest 2011 for > sw/source/core/inc/MarkManager.hxx and sw/source/core/doc/docbm.cxx > which improves speed of mailmerge. Bjoern already knows details so he > might be the o

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Patch for importing hyperliks from .doc files

On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 00:29 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: > Hi, > > This patch solves a serious problem experienced by many companies and > need to be included in libreoffice. > I'm using this patch with my own build for my customers with ooo 3.2.1 > > http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Libreoffice] cannot build with ATL, cannot build without

Hi I'm trying to build LibreOffice on Windows7. At the moment, I'm stuck on an ATL problem. I've tried disabling atl (--disable-atl), but that doesn't help because stuff in /extensions/source/ole still tries to include atlbase.h I've tried using the Windows Server 2003 R2 SDK, but then I get an e

[Libreoffice] Webdav lock support

Hi all, I wonder to know the status of webdav implementation in LibO 3.4.3. That is, I've open an issue (#39529) about support of lock file feature that seems to be supported but not yet implemented. Ciao Davide ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffic

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] some cleanup of Kashida justification code

On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:06 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:51 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > > Maybe this could be pushed? or something similar ? > > I think you're out of luck with an ifdef U_JG_FARSI_YEH because its an > enum, how about... pushed something now that should

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] hooks: update hook should reject obsolete tags

Hi there, On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:51 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Could you please apply on kemper in core.git the following patch? sorry it took so long; Done :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] "thereof" should be translated to modern English

On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 13:10 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > The calc print window uses has "There of". Although correct English, > it seem not to be the best choice of words. > See http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/msg03013.html > > The following minor patch tries to fix this. Any reject

Re: [Libreoffice] gnumake / dependencies 20%+ speedup ...

On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 07:39 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > could that be a case of > #include "scdllapi.h" > and > #include > > ? > Norbert Sounds like a winner, but -E claims... # 41 "/home/caolan/LibreOffice/core/sc/inc/address.hxx" 2 # 1 "/home/caolan/LibreOffice/core/sc/inc/scdllapi.h" 1

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|38065 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-marketing] Thanks for a fantastic Hackfest!

On 9/5/11 2:09 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: > I really enjoyed the time, and to me, the Hackfest was a real success! Recipes of pasta hacked in Munich are now online: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest2011#Pasta_Recipes -- Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com mobile +39.348.5653829

Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing

On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 01:22 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 02:39:37PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > > But before going there, I just need to make sure that we are on the same > > > page wrt keeping the new algorithm and moving on to fixing whatever > > > needs fixing. > > > >

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 rpr.nos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||38065 --- Comment #197 from rpr.no

Re: [Libreoffice] gnumake / dependencies 20%+ speedup ...

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:38 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: >>       I attach an updated cleanup.pl - that leaves the dummy rules, but >> removes duplicates in them > > Hmm, these dependencies and the pseudo-rules are initially spit out by > gcc

Re: [Libreoffice] building release tarballs

> then you are somehow disabling the unittest... > they have (in 3.4) hard coded clone// path in few of them That probably is the cause of the test failures I'm trying to fix. Or at least one cause. Thanks Neil Leathers ___ LibreOffice mailing list Lib

Re: [Libreoffice] gnumake / dependencies 20%+ speedup ...

On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:38 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > I attach an updated cleanup.pl - that leaves the dummy rules, but > removes duplicates in them Hmm, these dependencies and the pseudo-rules are initially spit out by gcc's -MP so... a) I'd have expected gcc to list each dependency onl

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 rpr.nos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36678 -- Configure bugmail: https

[Libreoffice] Thanks for a fantastic Hackfest!

Hello everyone, I wanted to express my deepest thanks to all of you for a fantastic and wonderful Hackfest. It was really a pleasure to be with our community in Munich, having a good time, hacking on the code and dicussing many interesting topics face to face. For many of us, it has been the f

Re: [Libreoffice] gnumake / dependencies 20%+ speedup ...

Hi Michael, On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 12:38:56 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > So - we need these rules in place; with a small tweak to my > script to print the dummy rules we'd be throwing away, I notice that > we have (eg.) [...] > several hundred duplicate dummy rules for many headers - st

[Libreoffice] Webdav lock support

Hi all, I wonder to know the status of webdav implementation in LibO 3.4.3. That is, I've open an issue (#39529) about support of lock file feature that seems to be supported but not yet implemented. Ciao Davide ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffic

Re: [Libreoffice] gnumake / dependencies 20%+ speedup ...

Hi there, On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 11:36 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 21:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Or are they there in fact there for some good purpose that I just > > failed to spot ? :-) > > Yes, I added all these deliberately. See > http://www.makelinux.net/

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild of external libraries and question about apparently special case like zlib, jpeg etc.

On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:46:38 +0100 Caolán McNamara wrote: > I think we should be able to remove that entire > -L/path/to/java/sdk/lib where that libjpeg lives from our universal > link line. I think we only ever need to link to something in there > for "bean" to link to lib[j]awt so we could add

Re: [Libreoffice] gcc/g++ compilation issue in desktop/splash

On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 15:15 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > I went ahead and did that with no love. For reference: > > $ ldd sal/unxlngx6/lib/libuno_sal.so | grep stdc > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7f122c7cb000) Sure sure, but when you actually end up with an inst

Re: [Libreoffice] gnumake / dependencies 20%+ speedup ...

On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 05:49:54 -0500 Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > maybe we could have that behavior be a config option ? that way box > that don;t need it (tinderboxes that do make clean/make > systematically) or people that chose performance over the occasional > breakage can disable it ? Well, setti

Re: [Libreoffice] gnumake / dependencies 20%+ speedup ...

On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 05:49 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > maybe we could have that behavior be a config option ? that way box > that don;t need it (tinderboxes that do make clean/make > systematically) For the tinderbox side of things, or for the similar distro-build-machine side of things wher

Re: [Libreoffice] A belated hello

Hi Stephan, On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:32:28 +0200 Stephan Bergmann wrote: > As you might already have noticed, I've started to become active > around here recently. That's because, since yesterday, I'm an > employee of Red Hat (though not yet with a proper email address, but > that will change soon

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild of external libraries and question about apparently special case like zlib, jpeg etc.

On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 05:44 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > It may be easier to have --prefix=$(SOLARVER)/external (and then > things in external/lib external/include) > but then again why bother with 'external'. surely we don't want to > pick and choose between system header and our local one fo

Re: [Libreoffice] gnumake / dependencies 20%+ speedup ...

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 21:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: >>       Or are they there in fact there for some good purpose that I just >> failed to spot ? :-) > > Yes, I added all these deliberately. See > http://www.makelinux.net/make3/make3-CH

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild of external libraries and question about apparently special case like zlib, jpeg etc.

On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:40 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > To add fun to this there is a unversioned libjpeg in the libpath you > need for compiling java-releated stuff (deployed from the jdk), which > makes the whole thing even more interesting. I think we should be able to remove that entire

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild of external libraries and question about apparently special case like zlib, jpeg etc.

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > As an aside, for prettyness, it would be nice to have the external > headers and libs always installed in inc/external libs/external and add > -I -L to the compiler/linker to find them. I gave a go at this at one > stage but fell into some

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild of external libraries and question about apparently special case like zlib, jpeg etc.

On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:47:33 +0100 Caolán McNamara wrote: > A practical example was libjpeg, iirc the stock libjpeg is always > configured using platform endianness, while our internal one *was* > configured little endian (or the other way around, stock is always > little endian and we configured

Re: [Libreoffice] gnumake / dependencies 20%+ speedup ...

On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 21:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Or are they there in fact there for some good purpose that I just > failed to spot ? :-) Yes, I added all these deliberately. See http://www.makelinux.net/make3/make3-CHP-8-SECT-3 for the rationale. The outcome is that on incremental

[Libreoffice] Please add postgresql-sdbc to Oracle source code grant to Apache Software Foundation

Hi, I'm trying to revive the postgresql-sdbc (native) driver (from http://dba.openoffice.org/drivers/postgresql/index.html ), and making good progress on the technical side. Eventually, I'd like it to be included in LibreOffice and the OpenOffice at Apache, just like the MySQL SDBC (native) drive

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] "thereof" should be translated to modern English

The calc print window uses has "There of". Although correct English, it seem not to be the best choice of words. See http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/msg03013.html The following minor patch tries to fix this. Any rejections ? $ git diff diff --git a/sc/source/ui/src/scstring.src b/

[Libreoffice] some binary string reading methods, generally msword related

I've added to tools rtl::OString read_uInt8s_AsOString(SvStream& rStr, sal_Size nLen); rtl::OUString read_LEuInt16s_AsOUString(SvStream& rStr, sal_Size nLen); which read nLen 8bit units or 16bit units from a SvStream into a O[UString]. They should be reasonably efficient and drop the usual extra

Re: [Libreoffice] Build break when generating RDBs

On Sep 2, 2011, at 6:28 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > >> On Sep 1, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Peter Foley wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Eike Rathke wrote: >>> Hi Peter, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 14:36:01 -0400, Peter Foley wrote: > [ build A

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild of external libraries and question about apparently special case like zlib, jpeg etc.

On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 11:28 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Sep 4, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > why is there zlib/zlib.h and external/zlib/zlib.h ? > > At least on Linux, that would result in only one of the two versions of > the external library being loaded, and the other d

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild of external libraries and question about apparently special case like zlib, jpeg etc.

On Sep 4, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Now, the question is: is there any scenario where one would build the > internal library but only use the internal library for some module and > the system library for others? > iow, why does the current code use a separate name for the interna

Re: [Libreoffice] building release tarballs

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Just in case it's what Neil asks: you can avoid the whole clone thing > with: > > 1) untar each tarball in the same directory > 2) for i in */*; do mv `pwd`/$i .; done > > At least that's what Fedora and I do as well. then you are somehow disa

Re: [Libreoffice] ODBC literal escapes in LibreOffice

Le 03/09/11 11:26, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit : I say go for it, sounds good :-)) Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] building release tarballs

On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 07:11:49PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Neil Leathers > wrote: > >> > I am trying to find instruction for how to build the released stable > >> > source. I have downloaded the files located at > >> > http://download.documentfoundatio

Re: [Libreoffice] map files: how to update? [was: cppu::OPropertySetHelper ABI backwards compatibility]

On Sep 2, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> - For the question of which symbols for OPropertySetHelper2 to list >> in the various map files, see >> (you >> probably need access to builds on the various platforms to find out >> t

Re: [Libreoffice] 3.5 release from QA to point-zero

Hi, for testers it might be really nice to release alpha/beta tarballs during early stages of development cycle. This would allow at least me to add it for testing into Gentoo and I think quite few people would test it that way. I provide even live ebuild that compiles from the git, but I think th

Re: [Libreoffice] map files: how to update? [was: cppu::OPropertySetHelper ABI backwards compatibility]

On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 05:13:36PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Revised patch attached; if it is good to go (especially with respect > to questions above), I'll commit (with a better commit message). Sorry, sent wrong version of patch (forgot to "git add"). Here is the right one. -- Lione