Hi Troy,
Troy Rollo píše v Po 18. 07. 2011 v 00:54 +1000:
> sw/source/filter/rtf/rtffld.cxx | 50 -
> sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8atr.cxx | 12 +++
> sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8par5.cxx | 63 +++--
> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(
Hi everyone,
If you are behind a firewall like me and you previously have corkscrew
set up, you can use this URL:
git clone ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/core.git
Of course, that one requires you to have commit access.
--
Marc-André Laverdière
Software Security Scientist
Innovation
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier
wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> That's not the point is it is
>
> if it's already an alias for ccache, it won't be prefixed with an
> additional "ccace"
>
> And that's not the case.
> CC is checked for ccache and possibly altered, then gcc version is
> checked
Hi *,
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Christian Lohmaier
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>> I've pushed
>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378ca38f59518b018fcc
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Christian Lohmaier
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> I've pushed
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378ca38f59518b018fccca8f
>
> Note on the Mac-OSX case:
> The previous check was not to comp
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> I've pushed
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378ca38f59518b018fccca8f
Note on the Mac-OSX case:
The previous check was not to completely disable ccache, but only to
check whether --ccache-skip can b
I've pushed
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378ca38f59518b018fccca8f
This try to automatically use ccache when present, unless CC= or CXX=
was specified by the user or --disable-ccache was passed to autogen
This also detect if CC or CXX is already an alias f
Hi Christoph, Hi all,
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 00:02:36 +0200
Christoph Noack
wrote:
> My question is who should review the Easy Hacks before publishing -
> when looking from the Design Team perspective, it would be good to at
> least add a UX (User Experience) statement whether the Easy Hack is
> he
Hi Christoph, all,
On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 14:32:08 +0200
Christoph Noack
wrote:
> Whenever I've intended to add an Easy Hack (means: before or after
> adding it to the issue tracker), I've asked a developer to have a look
> at it, because: I feel confident with regard to UX matters, I know
> some
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Gerald, Hi all,
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:51:55 +0200
Gerald Leppert wrote:
> 1. The whiteboard tag "ProposedEasyHack" does not seem to
> have any effect. So far, I have not seen any bug tagged
> as "ProposedEasyHack" which was touched by a developer
>
Dnia 2011-08-07, nie o godzinie 21:31 +0200, Eike Rathke pisze:
> I suggest
>
> ::std::vector::iterator GetAdded_Impl( size_t nKey );
>
> with logically the content of IsAdded_Impl() but using ::std::find()
> instead of the awkward loop and returning the position's iterator that
> can be used in
Hi Maciej,
On Sunday, 2011-08-07 17:04:49 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
> > You're right, the code is "suboptimal" ... in fact IsRemoved_Impl()
> > and
> > IsAdded_Impl() could also return the index of the element found so it
> > wouldn't be needed to be searched again. Want to take care of it
Hi all,
I have been working on salhelper, so we could use gbuid.
There were some issues with versions of library, so I have pushed my
work to feature/gbuild branch in new core repo and Bjoern will do
there some hacking.
I hope it's just for a while.
It would be nice if you won't do changes in salh
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi Norbert,
>
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> The One Git conversion is done.
>
> Just want to make sure I understand our plan correctly. The core
> repository is for the master branch and future releases, while
Hi Norbert,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> The One Git conversion is done.
Just want to make sure I understand our plan correctly. The core
repository is for the master branch and future releases, while the 3.4
releases and older will still be done in the old split re
changed it and pushed to master:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8b8f6835e60e179de616117f59af64d6f2c34b0a
2011/8/6 Kohei Yoshida
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 22:01 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this patch should ensure that we write the passwo
Greetings,
I am asking here about a couple of raised assertions and a
failed database query. Maybe there is a connection, but
maybe not.
My system is ubuntu-natty (11.04), and I did a build with
configuration parameters
--disable-mozilla --enable-symbols --enable-dbgutil
--enable-crashdu
Hi Gerald, *,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Gerald Leppert wrote:
> [...]
> I only would like to know how users are allowed / should / can contribute to
> the EasyHacks-system.
Sure they are, everyone is welcome to *suggest* easyhacks, but the
actual flagging as such should not be done by "bys
Hi Eike,
Dnia 2011-08-07, nie o godzinie 11:17 +0200, Eike Rathke pisze:
> You're right, the code is "suboptimal" ... in fact IsRemoved_Impl()
> and
> IsAdded_Impl() could also return the index of the element found so it
> wouldn't be needed to be searched again. Want to take care of it?
Yes :)
Hi,
On Sunday, 2011-08-07 14:23:20 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> I'm trying to build with --enable-werror
Seems I'm hit by http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40146
Ok, I'll skip that file, wait for my new machine and install Debian
wheezy that has gcc 4.6.1
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG
Hi Gerald, hi all!
Am Samstag, den 06.08.2011, 19:04 +0200 schrieb Gerald Leppert:
> Hi Friedrich, hi all,
>
> does anyone here have a less rigid opinion on that matter than the one
> expressed by Friedrich? I really don't care whether you want LibreOffice
> to be a developers AND users communi
Hi,
I'm trying to build with --enable-werror, in svtools I get
/lo/core/svtools/source/misc/templatefoldercache.cxx: In member function ‘bool
svt::TemplateContentEqual::operator()(const
rtl::Reference&, const
rtl::Reference&)’:
/lo/core/svtools/source/misc/templatefoldercache.cxx:288: error: ‘
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:59:36PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:47 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I generated it against libreoffice-3-4, but it should apply cleanly
>> against master, too.
> Looks sane to me, pushed.
> Confirm patch is under LGPLv3+/MPL1.1 ?, ca
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:19:49PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 12:07 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> A two-day-old clone of branch libreoffice-3-4 fails to build module
>> sal with dblevel=2, unittest fails: osl_old_test_file.cxx assertion
>> "#failure 1.1": the failu
Hi Maciej,
On Saturday, 2011-08-06 19:59:40 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
> > > DBG_ASSERT( bFound, "Key not found" );
> > > -aDelList.Remove( nAt );
> > > +aDelList.erase( nAt );
> >
> > Hmm.. I'd say the original code was wrong, when nAddKey was not foun
Hi Jonathan,
On Sunday, 2011-08-07 08:38:10 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Just out of curiosity those of us that have clones using the old
> build system will need to re clone correct?
Yes.
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
Key ID: 0x293C
27 matches
Mail list logo
