Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 25/07/2011 03:24, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Norbert, *, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: because you can build with a sdk 10.6 and a deployment-target of 10.4 (at least that is how I understood the )

Re: [Libreoffice] [MERGED and PUSHED] Brace for impact - gnumake4 to hit master

2011-07-24 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 08:53:36PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > If nobody protests, I will merge the branch to master on Sunday > > afternoon, so that I wont break the master for volunteers on the > > weekend, and so that we have good tinderbox result on Monday. > > Done. A little bre

Re: [Libreoffice] [MERGED and PUSHED] Brace for impact - gnumake4 to hit master

2011-07-24 Thread Marc-André Laverdière
Monday 11AM IST: ./g pull -r; autogen.sh; make dev-install Environment: Fedora 15 with Gnu Make 3.82 resulted in a successful build and I was able to open a document. So no apparent breakage for the older build systems in place. Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs,

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Norbert, *, > [..] > If matching SDK is available, use that, otherwise use whatever > "oldest" SDK is available and hope for the availability-macro stuff > (and more importantly the linking) doesn't fail. > This would of course requir

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Norbert, *, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: >> >>> because you can build with a sdk 10.6 and a deployment-target of 10.4 >>> (at least that is how I understood the ) >> >> Yes, in theory, but see my other

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Norbert, *, > >> because you can build with a sdk 10.6 and a deployment-target of 10.4 >> (at least that is how I understood the ) > > Yes, in theory, but see my other post, or look at the apple developer > lists. That it only works

[Libreoffice] Preparing announcement of the 3.4.2 release

2011-07-24 Thread Cor Nouws
[ Adding libreoffice-dev for _one_ time, so the guys there know we talk about this subject and can jump in if they so like ] Hi all, Soon there is an announcement for the 3.4.2 release to be expected. So it is time to decide how we can make that version known, also for use in enterprises.

[Libreoffice] Preparing announcement of the 3.4.2 release

2011-07-24 Thread Cor Nouws
[ Adding libreoffice-dev for _one_ time, so the guess there know we talk about this subject and can jump in if they so like ] Hi all, Soon there is an announcement for the 3.4.2 release to be expected. So it is time to decide how we can make that version known, also for use in enterprises.

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Norbert, *, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: >> >> regarding the default see the other posts. >> >> just regarding >> -MACDEVSDK*=/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk >> +MACDEVSDK*=$(MACSDK_PATH) >> >> time to

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.2 RC1 available

2011-07-24 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Petr, Petr Mladek wrote (19-07-11 17:22) Cor Nouws píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 09:12 +0200: Thanks for the lists, I see that bug #37488 is not listed, though it is fixed. The list of changes is generated from the git commit logs. The bug #37488 started to work accidentally. There was no com

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> Ok it is easier to discuss based on actual code... so: >> >> the attaches patch, allow for --with-mac-sdk=10.x to be specified >> the default is the lowest SDK

[Libreoffice] Conference Call for Papers extended

2011-07-24 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, this is to notify you that we have just extended the deadline for the LibreOffice Conference Call for Papers. You can now send in your proposal until August 8th at http://conference.libreoffice.org/submit-your-paper/ If you have something interesting from the community, intere

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Tor Lillqvist
The more I look at the "aqua" code (to get inspiration / hints for iOS CocoaTouch), and read the various notes from the MacOSX porters in the OOo Wiki, and read Apple documentation, the more I suspect / realize that the "aqua" MacOSX port is mostly using obsolete APIs. ATSUI , HITheme*, etc. P

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport] weekly report #9

2011-07-24 Thread Marco
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:38:19 +0200, Marco wrote: Hi all, this week I performed the following tasks: == 1 == Changed the handling of slide and shape unique identifiers generation. Now the same class used for generating unique identifier by the odp format exporter is exploited. == 2 == For ea

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Norbert, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Ok it is easier to discuss based on actual code... so: > > the attaches patch, allow for --with-mac-sdk=10.x to be specified > the default is the lowest SDK available in /Developer/SDKs regarding the default see the other pos

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Norbert, *, On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >>Like for example? >>Mac OSX was the first platform to be WaE free, despite some >>over-pickyness of the compiler. What pain did gcc 4.0 bring? > > actually I'm compiling with SDK 10.5 and gcc 4.2.1 right now and it is > pic

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

2011-07-24 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Tor, * (now all, wrong button the first time...), On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> Having lion doesn't force you to install the latest version of XCode, or >> does it? > > Well, if you want to use Xcode 4.x, it must be Xcode 4.1 (the latest). An > Xcode 4(.0) you had

[Libreoffice] [GSOC][PATCH] Multiline inputbar

2011-07-24 Thread Anurag Jain
Hello Kohei, Please find the patch for resizing the ScInputWindow. I've tried doing it the way you suggested; using proper typecasting I've moved the bIsMultiLine to the ScInputWindow and able to access the status in other classes too. Still this patch needs lots of improvement as the transition i

[Libreoffice] [MERGED and PUSHED] Brace for impact - gnumake4 to hit master

2011-07-24 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 04:10:37 +0200 Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > If nobody protests, I will merge the branch to master on Sunday > afternoon, so that I wont break the master for volunteers on the > weekend, and so that we have good tinderbox result on Monday. Done. Best, Bjoern -- https://lau

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#37628: pssword button is always disabled

2011-07-24 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello Kohei, all, this is a possible patch for the problem that the button at File->Properties is always disabled even if you have a password protected file. The problem was that SID_PASSWORD, which saved the plain text password, is no longer used but we use SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA which saves the has

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] produce smaller .res files with the resource compiler

2011-07-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Andras Timar wrote: > Hi, > > I'm studying the binary .res format and I noticed that every .res file > contains a 2168 bytes long data block. This data block contains the > enumeration of VCL resource types, however, it is never read and seems > to be unnecessary.

Re: [Libreoffice] Build from master failing on MacOSX in svx with globlmn.hrc

2011-07-24 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 05/07/11 17:14, Caolán McNamara a écrit : Hi Caolàn, > > Is this still a problem ? I did a Linux build with those languages (well > hi-IN -> hi) yesterday without any such build breakage. Yes, it still breaks. I did a fresh pull from master yesterday, make clean, then autogen.sh and make. The