Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

> Having lion doesn't force you to install the latest version of XCode, or does > it? Well, if you want to use Xcode 4.x, it must be Xcode 4.1 (the latest). An Xcode 4(.0) you had in 10.6 tells you to upgrade when you try to use it on 10.7. I haven't tried if one can run the IDE of Xcode 3.2.6

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen options on MacOSX

Le 23/07/11 07:45, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : > > btw, I pushed a fix to remove --enable-ext-scripting-python from all > the distro-config/* file Excellent, thanks !! Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.f

[Libreoffice] Still no Python scripting framework activated on Mac OSX with daily builds from master

Hi all, After discussion with Norbert on autogen switches for Mac and a warning I was getting about python-ext-scripting not being supported, I was wondering whether this might this be an explanation as to why the latest daily builds from master do not include an activated Python scripting framewo

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen options on MacOSX

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 23/07/11 07:34, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : > >> >> the difference is most likely the level of autoconf >> you prolly use a more recent one than the default one provided by Mac OS X >> which nicely inform you of 'unsupported option' w

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen options on MacOSX

Le 23/07/11 07:34, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : > > the difference is most likely the level of autoconf > you prolly use a more recent one than the default one provided by Mac OS X > which nicely inform you of 'unsupported option' whereas mine silently > ignore them Hehe, nice :) I just love compu

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen options on MacOSX

precisely that option was removed by bootstrap:baf7c3d8406afc2011aa777005b71cdffbbc04a4 at that point scripting provider for python is related to whether or not python is enabled... so: the option should be removed from LibreOfficeMacOSX. Norbert ___

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen options on MacOSX

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 23/07/11 06:55, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : > > Hi again, > >> >> >> So the error comes in at this point, so the only thing I can think of is >> that the "--enable-ext-scripting-python" switch that gets activated by >> "--with-distr

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen options on MacOSX

Le 23/07/11 06:55, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : Hi again, > > > So the error comes in at this point, so the only thing I can think of is > that the "--enable-ext-scripting-python" switch that gets activated by > "--with-distro" is incompatible with Tor's new "--enable-python" switch ?? Hmmm, e

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen options on MacOSX

Le 23/07/11 06:07, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : Hi Norbert, I'm running on master. > > What does the autogen.sh output is? for instance mine is: > running ./configure with 'CC=ccache gcc-4.0' 'CXX=ccache g++-4.0' '--with-max-jobs=4' '--with-num-cpus=2' '--with-lang=en-US' '--with-vendor=The Do

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen options on MacOSX

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Hi, > > Am I doing something wrong, or is there an error in the flag : > > --with-distro="LibreOfficeMacOSX" > > as it produces the following warning when used with autogen.sh : > > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-ext

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

>Like for example? >Mac OSX was the first platform to be WaE free, despite some >over-pickyness of the compiler. What pain did gcc 4.0 bring? actually I'm compiling with SDK 10.5 and gcc 4.2.1 right now and it is picking up quite few more WaE. so gcc-4.0 is not over-picky, quite the contrary... an

[Libreoffice] Autogen options on MacOSX

Hi, Am I doing something wrong, or is there an error in the flag : --with-distro="LibreOfficeMacOSX" as it produces the following warning when used with autogen.sh : configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-ext-scripting-python The options I'm currently attempting to pass are : --wi

[Libreoffice] how to fix error Cannot link against library/libraries cairo in building LibreOffice

hi, I trying to build LibreOffice in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS .. When i followed  the instruction in http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build  i was end up with following error. when i compile code by  'make' command it says that there is an error in vcl module  then I re-run bui

[Libreoffice] Wonderful gaming room

Nothing is as exciting as free games with huge jackpots, every player knows that and it is the reason why they go and play regularly. http://arquicio.com/ten.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.

[Libreoffice] Brace for impact - gnumake4 to hit master

Hi all, feature/gnumake4 is about to be merged into master. As this changes a lot of low-level build system stuff, there will be quite few temporary instabilities and problems (esp. on non-Linux platforms) after the merge. Some highlights of the changes to the build system: - gb_{Library,LinkTarg

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#37218: tinv only takes values up to 10000 as second parameter

On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 19:44 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > So finally pushed it to master. It's a safe change as it only changes > the upper limit to 1E10.(and yes the check for greater 1E10 is > intended instead of greater equal because excel behaves the same way) > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

Hi Norbert, *, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > the attaches patch, allow for --with-mac-sdk=10.x to be specified > the default is the lowest SDK available in /Developer/SDKs This is pointless, it is the same as dropping 10.4 support. > Note: the patches themselves d

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

Hi Norbert, *, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > [...] > The benefit is that a new developer can still build the product, even > if he has _only_ a brand new lion. Having lion doesn't force you to install the latest version of XCode, or does it? > As you mentioned earli

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

Hi Tor, *, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> I just find that "drop it because it is old" is not enough reason to >> drop 10.4 support. > > Yeah, I see your point. > > I guess a good enough reason to drop it would be this hypothetical (but, I > guess, quite possible) situa

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> I just find that "drop it because it is old" is not enough reason to >> drop 10.4 support. > > Yeah, I see your point. > > I guess a good enough reason to drop it would be this hypothetical (but, I > guess, quite possible) situation, or som

Re: [Libreoffice] compiling from source tarballs

Hi Olivier, On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 14:47 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote: > I am behind a firewall and cannot use git directly. I downloaded 3.3.3 > tarballs from the site. Great :-) encouraging indeed. > Are there instructions specific to build from the source donwloaded as > tarballs?

Re: [Libreoffice] compiling from source tarballs

Hi Olivier, On Friday, 2011-07-22 14:47:45 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote: > I am behind a firewall and cannot use git directly. Corkscrew may comfort your grief.. see http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php?title=Git#Using_Git_Behind_a_Firewall for how to setup with git. netcat-openbsd should wor

[Libreoffice] compiling from source tarballs

Hi I am behind a firewall and cannot use git directly. I downloaded 3.3.3 tarballs from the site. Are there instructions specific to build from the source donwloaded as tarballs? I ask that because the build seems to require the tarballs to be in a specific place, and also requires them to be a g

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#37218: tinv only takes values up to 10000 as second parameter

So finally pushed it to master. It's a safe change as it only changes the upper limit to 1E10.(and yes the check for greater 1E10 is intended instead of greater equal because excel behaves the same way) http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=514fa420a68076537adfc8d7344a20e8c0baa3f

[Libreoffice] makefile in bootstrap

Hey guys I am working on getting libreoffice going on android, and I thought it would be best to start working on getting writer working on android. There is the Makefile in bootstrap is that what I should edit to remove modules that I would not need when compiling LO for android? ___

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

Ok it is easier to discuss based on actual code... so: the attaches patch, allow for --with-mac-sdk=10.x to be specified the default is the lowest SDK available in /Developer/SDKs The patch does not check that your CC anc CCX make sens based on the SDK selected (ToDO list) I have only tested it

Re: [Libreoffice] [Fwd: RE: LibreOffice Build Problem]

On 7/22/11 6:30 PM, TUGAY İLBAY wrote: Hi, I tried ./g pull -r, but I got the same error again. After that I checked the latest version and I did the following: ./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=6 --with-max-jobs=6 --without-junit you need to run ./g clone -r which will clone the rest of the repo

Re: [Libreoffice] [Fwd: RE: LibreOffice Build Problem]

Hi, I tried ./g pull -r, but I got the same error again. After that I checked the latest version and I did the following: ./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=6 --with-max-jobs=6 --without-junitmake fetchmake 2>&1 | tee build.log Finally I got error. So, I tried ./g pull -r and then make 2>&1 | tee bu

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix parent level count in numbering from docx

Before this patch, when importing from docx, if there were no parent numbering levels in the number formats for outline numbered paragraphs, the import would include all parent levels back to the second numbering level, in the third and subsequent numbering levels. --- writerfilter/source/dmapper

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 39236, which changed state. Bug 39236 Summary: EDITING Calc crashes when deleting a sheet with a pivot table on it https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39236 What|Old Value |New

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Norbert, *, > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> [...] >> Caveat: Like tml_ I don't consider myself a 'Mac' developer... just a >> Dev that happen to own a Mac. >> >> That being said, Christian is the perso

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

> I just find that "drop it because it is old" is not enough reason to > drop 10.4 support. Yeah, I see your point. I guess a good enough reason to drop it would be this hypothetical (but, I guess, quite possible) situation, or something similar: Some volunteer wants to contribute code that mak

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix field values in export to docx

Prior to this patch, fields were being exported to docx file with the field value being the name of the field. This patch changes it to export the field value as the field value. --- sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.cxx |6 -- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Import of xrefs to numbered paragraphs from docx

This replaces the earlier version of this patch, which was wrong for the NUMBER_FULL_CONTEXT cross-reference type. --- writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper_Impl.cxx | 20 +++- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMa

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

Hi Norbert, *, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > [...] > Caveat: Like tml_ I don't consider myself a 'Mac' developer... just a > Dev that happen to own a Mac. > > That being said, Christian is the person that need convincing. Oh, I don't consider myself any more Mac deve

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 20:21 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote: >> Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings: > >        Wow - what a nice write-up; we have similar problems on Linux deciding > what versions of what un

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

Hi *, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 20:21 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote: >> Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings: > [...] >        I'd love an ack from Norbert / Christian - to make a final decision, or > if it is truly contro

[Libreoffice] Nuovo messaggio

Informazioni Finanziamenti Buongiorno, con la presente Vi segnaliamo il sito http://digilander.libero.it//a1mondo06 . Se avete necessità di un prestito e/o un mutuo , se la vostra attività ha bisogno di nuovi investimenti o di fronteggiare una situazione di crisi , se volete intraprendere

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] produce smaller .res files with the resource compiler

Hi, I'm studying the binary .res format and I noticed that every .res file contains a 2168 bytes long data block. This data block contains the enumeration of VCL resource types, however, it is never read and seems to be unnecessary. I thought that it would be a small size win, I removed this block

Re: [Libreoffice] 3.4.2 RC2 page in wiki

Rainer Bielefeld píše v Pá 22. 07. 2011 v 13:50 +0200: > Florian Effenberger schrieb: > > Hello, > > > > can someone fill the page > > > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.4.2/RC2 > > Hi, > > has been discussed yesterday at TSC call, we have >

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: dmake fix ...

I cherry-picked to libreoffice-3-4 f. On 22/07/11 12:07, Michael Meeks wrote: I'd like to get this into libreoffice-3-4 - I hope it is self explanatory ;-) amused to catch this in the debugger on Linux, and see the 100% CPU spin that injecting a bogus EPIPE causes to 'Quit'. __

Re: [Libreoffice] 3.4.2 RC2 page in wiki

Florian Effenberger schrieb: Hello, can someone fill the page http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.4.2/RC2 Hi, has been discussed yesterday at TSC call, we have (Ah, I see, you closed it) with hint for some draft contents. AFAIK

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#37218: tinv only takes values up to 10000 as second parameter

Hi Markus, On Thursday, 2011-07-21 19:54:14 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > it seems that the method is quite accurate up to 1E11 and with a bit more > difference up to 1E13 or 1E14 and above this goes badly wrong. But it > depends very much on the first paramter. Then I suggest to use the same

Re: [Libreoffice] Error compiling from master inside vcl

On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:03 +0530, Marc-André Laverdière wrote: > Undefined references are typically because of a change that is missing > on your copy of the repo. > > I would do the following: ./g pull -r ; autogen.sh; make dev-install won't help, the missing symbols aren't *our* symbols, they

[Libreoffice] 3.4.2 RC2 page in wiki

Hello, can someone fill the page http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.4.2/RC2 with content? Seems the release notes for RC2 are missing. The same, BTW, seems to be true for the http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.4.2/RC1 page. Thanks, Florian -- Florian Effenberg

[Libreoffice] [MHST] GDB doesn't show name of methods in backtrace

Hi, I've tried to add a radio button into print dialog for Writer. In /sw/source/core/view/printdata.cxx, I have this piece of code (around line 310) http://pastebin.com/gMu70wYm ~~~ aChoices[3] = aLocalizedStrings.GetSt

Re: [Libreoffice] Error compiling from master inside vcl

Undefined references are typically because of a change that is missing on your copy of the repo. I would do the following: ./g pull -r ; autogen.sh; make dev-install Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Hyderabad, India On 07/21/2011 10:57

Re: [Libreoffice] Unit tests - cppunit crashing with debug build

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:30 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Ha, I just came across this type of crash (initially seemed very > mysterious, some data on the stack being apparently randomly > overwritten by unrelated code...) when running the > sal_cppunittester_all test on the iOS simulator... Luckil

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

+1 Support doesn't come free. If there is a real need for it, then we can reverse decision any time... Git is there for such things :) Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Hyderabad, India On 07/22/2011 03:42 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Jo

Re: [Libreoffice] [Fwd: RE: LibreOffice Build Problem]

Hi Tugay, It seems that you need to learn the reply-to-all thing, usually that takes only one or two tries :-) the advantage of requiring that is that old-timers / competent people soon learn it, and we're much more welcoming to new faces. > > PS: @Michael, I want to contribute developing

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoofice] build errors - missing SvStream::remainingSize

On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 03:07 +0700, thamht wrote: > I'm trying to build libreoffice right after './g pull -r' to get the > latest source code, however, there are some errors as the following: Did your ./g pull -r fully succeed ? If you have a './g diff' that is non-empty, modules you have

Re: [Libreoffice] windows.h inclusions (was: Re: Review request for 3-4-2 build fix for Windows)

On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 03:56 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote: > I actually dare to contend that the mdds fix is much cleaner and more > robust for following reasons: Heh ;-) I think it is pretty clear that including windows.h is a shortcut for rapid insanity. I'd strongly prefer to write reada

Re: [Libreoffice] LO Custom properties

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 11:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 09:15 +0530, swagat sharma wrote: > > Thanks for your valuable time. I'll explain the problem in more > > details. > > Great - that is most helpful :-) > > > I create a new Document (.odt file). I

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

Hi Joe, On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 20:21 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote: > Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings: Wow - what a nice write-up; we have similar problems on Linux deciding what versions of what underlying infrastructure to support and/or when to axe it.

[Libreoffice] dmake fix ...

Hi there, I'd like to get this into libreoffice-3-4 - I hope it is self explanatory ;-) amused to catch this in the debugger on Linux, and see the 100% CPU spin that injecting a bogus EPIPE causes to 'Quit'. ATB, Michael. >From 7f823d91d55900ee7d5bedbc145b280942f

Re: [Libreoffice] Kill Dtwm/CDE

On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 01:36 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > On 07/21/2011 09:49 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > Why does LO tinker with window managers in the first place ? > > Maybe from times where you had to do so (various X servers and > implementations) and the idea of StarOffice as all-in-one

Re: [Libreoffice] Kill Dtwm/CDE

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 21:49 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > Why does LO tinker with window managers in the first place ? It wants to get its way with them :-) so - eg. we do a lot of explicit window manager interactions that we should not really be doing - stacking our floating windows, f

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#37218: tinv only takes values up to 10000 as second parameter

Hi Markus, On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 19:54 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > We have a bug report that asks for a larger upper limit and I think as > long as Excel has one and there is no technical reason to deny this we > should increase it. I think at least the 1E10 that Excel allows is > something we

Re: [Libreoffice] Kill Dtwm/CDE

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:34:46AM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > So I let the enums untouched. It's all pushed to master. > > There is a strange vendor list at saldisp.cxx. I think some stuff is > very outdated, but I have no possibility to check it on Sun etc. > > http://opengrok.libreoffice.or

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 37888, which changed state. Bug 37888 Summary: FILESAVE Writer crashes saving .doc as .doc soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in OutputTextNode() https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37888 What|Old

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS 10.4 Support

> I believe it's about time to drop 10.4 support in LibreOffice. [in master] I agree, but please ignore my opinion, as I am not really in the Mac part of this community... I just happen to have also a MacBookPro, I love it, and build LO on it (natively, and cross-compiling for iOS). > Most of t

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] newer vcredist_x64.exe

> For 32-bit Windows we ship the latest Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 > Redistributable but for 64-bit Windows it is an older version. Please note, though, that actually we don't ship the 64-bit Explorer extension in 3.4, which is what would require the 64-bit C(++) runtime (fdo#36950) . So either