On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Benoit Dolives
wrote:
> Hi,
> Please find in attachment the patch for the bug 36181.
> Bug:
> While using "Replace" in the "Find&Replace" dialog of writer, the selected
> text was always replaced even if it does not match the searched string.
> Correction:
> Check
Hi Cor,
Thanks for spreading it! It is quite important we have a common sense on the
working flow. I think your thinking is absolutely right and it is worth of
taking time :) Thank you again!
Best wishes,
Yifan
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 07:36:12PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Hi Yifan
>
> Yifan Jiang
Hi,
On 3 July 2011 23:00, Andras Timar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011.07.02. 19:23 keltezéssel, Matúš Kukan írta:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 1 July 2011 15:19, Michael Meeks wrote:
>>> Hi Matus,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 13:53 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
- It is probably somehow related to published service
Hi Caolán, all,
Concerning your open question, the proposed patch checks if the searched
string belongs to the selection by using the same mechanism as the common
search command. Therefore it should have the same behaviour as the search
command in both cases (common or advanced search/replace).
B
Hi,
2011.07.02. 19:23 keltezéssel, Matúš Kukan írta:
> Hi,
>
> On 1 July 2011 15:19, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Hi Matus,
>>
>> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 13:53 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
>>> - It is probably somehow related to published service
>>> ProductRegistration.idl in offapi.
>>
>>Well -
Hi Thorsten, *
Am 29.06.2011 10:49, schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
>
> Hm, so we need to pay special attention here. Andre, Sophie, do we
> have a place where to collect those "special QA" requests already?
Rainer started to collect ideas and people for monthly QA sessions, see
http://wiki.documentf
Hi,
this would add the correct help strings for the patch I sent recently.
So if you apply the source code patch, please also apply this one to
change the help accordingly.
btw: I could also commit the help changes if this would make it easier.
Patch is contributed under LGPLv3+/MPL.
Thanks a
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 06:57:16AM -0700, tracey002 wrote:
> I did not find what I anything that looked applicable.
> However I did download the source code from the download page contained
> in tar.bz2 files.
> I assume these are zip files.
No, these are tar.bz2 files.
> Can you tell me what f
On 20/06/2011 Michael Meeks wrote:
> We need people who in addition to coping with the tedium of reacting to
> the security issues, providing fixes and testing them on older branches
> - also like to write them up.
> > This is an important factor for people considering to upgrade their
> > cu
