Re: [Libreoffice] [patch] [PUSHED] Bug 37889 - Adapt smoothing with splines to ODF1.2

Hi Regina, On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 21:39 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > In ODF 1.2 [1] smoothing with splines is concretized. The spec now > contains a detailed description, how this splines have to be calculated. > > [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/OpenDocument-v1.2-part1.odt > > Th

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] delete obsoleted help pages fdo#37543

Hello all, This patch delete the obsoleted help pages as described in fdo#37543, by removing filename in the makefile, and delete that pages. Also, as described in fdo#37543, may I ask how to delete WhatLinksHere as well? Next, I understand that the WIKIHELP pages will be deleted automatically a

[Libreoffice] Merge of branch feature/unlimited-number-of-sheets to master

Hello all, I just merged the branch feature/unlimited-number-of-sheets to master. This only affects calc, but we did a lot of changes to the core of calc so if you notice any problems with building or with functions that are not working as expected please send me a short mail. Calc should now be

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC][patch] Multiline inputbar

On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 07:27 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote: > Hello Kohei, > > In this patch I've removed the hard coded values for the height Yup. This one looks much better. Pushed to your feature branch. :-) BTW, it would be nice to have you pull the new changes from the repository so that your n

[Libreoffice] [GSOC][patch] Multiline inputbar

Hello Kohei, In this patch I've removed the hard coded values for the height Thanks and regards. -- Anurag Jain Final yr B.Tech CSE SASTRA University Thanjavur(T.N.)-613402 diff --git a/sc/source/ui/app/inputwin.cxx b/sc/source/ui/app/inputwin.cxx index db934bd..130ea63 100644 --- a/sc/source/ui

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANN] List for collaboration around user experience topics created

Hi Thorsten, *, Thorsten Behrens schrieb: >Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: >> Think about it - less work for You in total ;o)) >well, I don't care at all where the list is located - I just >recalled the across-the-board rule of having reply-to-mangling >active on the TDF lists, so I wanted to spare

[Libreoffice] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.3.3 RC1 available

Dear Community, The Document Foundation is happy to announce the first release candidate of LibreOffice 3.3.3. The upcoming 3.3.3 is the third in a series of frequent bugfix releases on top of our LibreOffice 3.3 product. Please be aware that LibreOffice 3.3.3 RC1 is not yet ready for production u

[Libreoffice] [GSoC] [rtfimport] 2nd week

Hi, Second week starts here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/lo-gsoc/tree/README#n179 In short, it was about: - character styles - paragraph styles - character properties - paragraph properties Miklos pgpUm0Zkq4R5s.pgp Description: PGP signature __

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#38007 fix for a truncated German string

Hi, Can someone please review my patch and cherry-pick it to 3-4: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=02a8e58fa874a11419348a8758739abd1240ebf2 fdo#38007 fix for a truncated German string Thanks, Andras ___ LibreOffice mailing list

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#37998 OpenOffice.org strings in package descriptions

Hi, Can someone please review my patch and cherry-pick it to 3-4. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/components/commit/?id=023080bb79698eb747d525fc9e7c7078d7c99501 In some 3.4.0 RPMs the vendor string was OpenOffice.org instead of The Document Foundation and the description contained OpenOff

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] Re: KCachegrind

Hi Matus, On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 21:40 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > could you please have a look at > http://kcachegrind.sourceforge.net/html/CallgrindFormat.html > 1.4 Extended Example Looks fun :-) > If we would like to 'hide' just func1 there is no way to include its > cost into main be

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:32 -0700, BRM wrote: > - Original Message > > > From: Kohei Yoshida > > To: BRM > > Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org > > Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM > > Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing > > > > On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM

[Libreoffice] [GSoC] Re: KCachegrind

Hi Micheal, could you please have a look at http://kcachegrind.sourceforge.net/html/CallgrindFormat.html 1.4 Extended Example If we would like to 'hide' just func1 there is no way to include its cost into main because it's calling func2, which is not hidden. We could add all its inclusive cost to

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC][patch] Multiline inputbar

Hi Kohei, Have a look into this. I've fixed the display problem with the j and g letters. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Hi Anurag, > > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 00:15 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote: >> Hello Kohei, >> >> I was able to figure out how to make the text appear proper

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing

- Original Message > From: Kohei Yoshida > To: BRM > Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org > Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM > Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing > > On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote: > > > Just remember, that even with LGPL/GPL the chang

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC][patch] Multiline inputbar

Hi Anurag, On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 00:15 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote: > Hello Kohei, > > I was able to figure out how to make the text appear properly in the > inputbar when in single line mode. I'm sending my patch over here. > Please have a look into it and let me know about further improvements > t

Re: [Libreoffice] svg embedding?

Hi Zak, Zak McKracken wrote (06-06-11 09:18) [in case this is in the wrong list/group, feel free to set me straight] Yes it is. See http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice Better mail your question to disc...@documentfoundation.org Regards, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffic

[Libreoffice] svg embedding?

Hello everyone, [in case this is in the wrong list/group, feel free to set me straight] I just realized that OpenOffice 3.4 finally has one of my most wished-for features, which is the embedding of SVG images. As images, including all the really cool features that SVG supports. I tried it, a

[Libreoffice] [GSOC][patch] Multiline inputbar

Hello Kohei, I was able to figure out how to make the text appear properly in the inputbar when in single line mode. I'm sending my patch over here. Please have a look into it and let me know about further improvements that can be done. Thanks and regards. -- Anurag Jain Final yr B.Tech CSE SAST

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Performance improvements for calcs' sheet actions

[ Stepping in since Christoph without doubt is bathing his baby ;-) ] Kohei Yoshida wrote (06-06-11 18:01) On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:55 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: So, I wonder if the UX guys don't mind us never updating a progress bar more than twice per second (say) [1] we could do th

Re: [Libreoffice] Weekly merge of libreoffice-3-4 -> master

Hi Kendy, 2011/6/6 Jan Holesovsky : > - translations: Andras, I think it is correct to leave out the >  translations from merging; or not? No, merging translations between branches does not look useful to me. I think it's too early to do anything with translations on master. Translators should fi

Re: [Libreoffice] QA manual test Litmus session on 3.3.3Rc

Merci Sophie Le 2011-06-05 16:36, Sophie Gautier a écrit : Hi all, *please, follow up on the projects list, thanks in advance* I am new to this, the "litmus tutorial" link is broken. Could someone fix this? Cheers Marc ___ LibreOffice mailing

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Replace List for vector<>

Once again with the correct subject. Rafael Dominguez píše v Čt 02. 06. 2011 v 12:41 -0430: Pushed into master. Thanks for the nice work! Best Regards, Petr ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replace List for vector<>

Rafael Dominguez píše v Čt 02. 06. 2011 v 12:41 -0430: Pushed into master. Thanks for the nice work! Best Regards, Petr ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Replace List for std::vector

Rafael Dominguez píše v Čt 02. 06. 2011 v 12:40 -0430: Pushed into master. Thanks for the nice work! Best Regards, Petr ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Weekly merge of libreoffice-3-4 -> master

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:07 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:55 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > > - calc: Kohei, can you please do it? There were 3 conflicts or so. > > I'll work on it once my clean build of master finishes. Done. Though I'm not sure if I did it right wi

[Libreoffice] [GSOC][patch] Multiline inputbar

Hi Kohei, Find the change I made. thanks and regards. -- Anurag Jain Final yr B.Tech CSE SASTRA University Thanjavur(T.N.)-613402 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Duplicate code: join ImportFrom and InsertFrom

Noel Power píše v St 01. 06. 2011 v 10:16 +0100: > On 31/05/11 13:03, Chr. Rossmanith wrote: > > Hi, > > > > more duplicate code cleanup. > > > > Class SfxObjectShell has two nearly identical methods: ImportFrom and > > InsertFrom. The latter has a few lines of code more, so I've removed > > Inse

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][REVIEW][PUSHED-3-4] Fix bug in CloneList

Rafael Dominguez píše v Čt 26. 05. 2011 v 10:08 -0430: > This patch fix a code i ommited in a previos commit > 674c10b068d27d5ebdb25458d31dd8a61b343eb6, also should be included in > 3.4.1 I have pushed it into the libreoffice-3-4 branch. Best Regards, Petr PS: It was better to use [REVIEW] in

Re: [Libreoffice] Weekly merge of libreoffice-3-4 -> master

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:55 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > - calc: Kohei, can you please do it? There were 3 conflicts or so. I'll work on it once my clean build of master finishes. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Performance improvements for calcs' sheet actions

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:55 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > So, I wonder if the UX guys don't mind us never updating a progress bar > more than twice per second (say) [1] we could do this for all progress > bars in one place. Clearly calling a > FooProgres->update(percent) method a bazillion

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote: > Just remember, that even with LGPL/GPL the changes _do not have to be > contributed back to the community_; only made available to the customers of > that > product upon request (per LGPL, GPL and MPL). Not entirely correct. The source has to be

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 37942, which changed state. Bug 37942 Summary: some formulas not recognized https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37942 What|Old Value |New Value --

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing

- Original Message > From: Jesús Corrius > To: michael.me...@novell.com > Hi Michael, > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks >wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote: > >> 1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO >

[Libreoffice] question about image control

Hi, I'm creating a new ToolPanel for my product. I want to a an image which is the icon of a remote document, which can be edited in LO. I can't display image. If I inserted a button with the same image, the button displays correctly the icon but not the controlImage. What I've missed ? Here's

[Libreoffice] Работа с возрaжениями и coмнениями клиента

> КОГДA «HEТ» ПРEBРАЩАЕТСЯ B «ДA»: или РAБОТА C BОЗPАЖЕНИЯМИ И СОМHЕНИЯМИ КЛИЕHТА > Сeминар • 8 июня • 2011 г. > г. Kиев • бульв. Шeвчeнко, 4 • oтель «Caнкт-Пeтербург» > Тeл.: (044) 223-4882 и 223-5141 -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- ЦEЛЕВАЯ АУДИТ

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport] weekly report #2

Hi Marco, you wrote: > So I saw that exporting multiple slides into a single svg file > is already implemented, as we can argue by looking into the source > of the exported svg document. > Have you tried it? Does it work? > There is even a partial support to master pages. At present for > each sl

Re: [Libreoffice] please simplify #define OSL_FILE_TRACE

Am 06.06.2011 14:54, schrieb Michael Meeks: On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 10:44 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variadic_macro "The GNU Compiler Collection, since 3.0, C++Builder 2006 and Visual Studio 2005 [1] support variable-argument macros, both when compilin

[Libreoffice] [Fwd: [tdf-discuss] Code covered by the Oracle grant (was: Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice)]

So, This is more useful here I think :-) First - thanks Christian for your wonderful analysis; most helpful. I generated a top-level directories view of which pieces are still (at least partially) there, and which are gone, not as useful as Christian's view - in many cases, just a makefile

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED]Re: [REVIEW] fdo#37985 dialog layout issue

Hi, On 2011-06-06 at 14:31 +0200, Andras Timar wrote: > Can someone please review and cherry-pick to 3-4 this harmless patch > that resolves a truncation issue in the Pivot Table creation dialog? > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=f4f929a6f7a8645956983c9c72a5590d0ceb7c2d T

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] [PUSHED] fdo#37985 dialog layout issue

> Can someone please review and cherry-pick to 3-4 this harmless patch > that resolves a truncation issue in the Pivot Table creation dialog? > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=f4f929a6f7a864595698 > 3c9c72a5590d0ceb7c2d Done, pushed. --tml ___

[Libreoffice] Weekly merge of libreoffice-3-4 -> master

Hi, I have merged the current state of libreoffice-3-4 into master, and pushed. The pieces I left out: - calc: Kohei, can you please do it? There were 3 conflicts or so. - translations: Andras, I think it is correct to leave out the translations from merging; or not? Regards, Kendy ___

[Libreoffice] please simplify #define OSL_FILE_TRACE

On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 10:44 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variadic_macro > "The GNU Compiler Collection, since 3.0, C++Builder 2006 and Visual > Studio 2005 [1] support variable-argument macros, both when compiling > C and C++ code. In addition, GCC sup

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 37930, which changed state. Bug 37930 Summary: Crash when clicking the button to choose a document file in hyperlink dialog https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37930 What|Old Value

Re: [Libreoffice] Master fails to build in vcl with --enable-kde4 flag

On Sunday 05 of June 2011, Albert Thuswaldner wrote: > Hi, > There seems to be a linkage problem when trying to build the vcl > module in master against kde4. ... > Still this operation fails with a massive output of undefined > references to Kde and Qt objects. Is this error is related to the > re

[Libreoffice] Как продать то, что не продаётся?

Как продать то, что не продаётся?Поможем увеличить продажи до 30%,Не получится, вернём деньги.Заходите и смотрите методику, увеличение продаж в Вашей компании http://uasem.com.ua/kak_prodat.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedeskto

Re: [Libreoffice] Android versions that we will compile LO for

Dear Rodrigo, > Our plans is to make an LibO version for tablets. Of course, Android API > make it possible to tablet apps run on smartphones as well, but it affects > our target version. > > Jonathan, I think it'd be better to target 3.0 for now. I think that most of > the Android tablets will r

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#37985 dialog layout issue

Hi, Can someone please review and cherry-pick to 3-4 this harmless patch that resolves a truncation issue in the Pivot Table creation dialog? http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=f4f929a6f7a8645956983c9c72a5590d0ceb7c2d Thanks, Andras ___

Re: [Libreoffice] A (new?) bug in LibreOffice 3.4 and a missing feature?

On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:36:00 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > Ah - well, that is different :-) in which case, I concede > that perhaps it is not the best plan if it doesn't work so well. It works well enough for the average home user to use it, but has enough bugs for the average admin of a >1

Re: [Libreoffice] Performance improvements for calcs' sheet actions

On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 02:04 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > I've been looking a bit further into the performance problem when > dealing with several sheets and am now at the move > method.(ScDocument::MoveTab) ;-) FWIW - document -load- used to cause way more progress-bar updating CPU cyc

Re: [Libreoffice] A (new?) bug in LibreOffice 3.4 and a missing feature?

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 11:34 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > - the code has been moved upstream to LibreOffice. > - it is disabled in the default build (so also in the build done > upstream). So - I personally love the idea of unified menus, and I'd love to have this turned on when uni

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37488 --- Comment #140 from Rainer Bi

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Complete fix for fdo#32684

Hi all, On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:55 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > That bug was badly fixed (by me) quite some times ago. Here is a correct > fix (why did I add that code at all ?). Could you review it and push it > in 3.4 and 3.4.0? > > More cleanup is needed but it'll end up in master: some o

Re: [Libreoffice] Android versions that we will compile LO for

Hi, Martin and everybody I'm one of the "great individuals" Jonathan mentioned (although I'm not so great like he said :P). Our plans is to make an LibO version for tablets. Of course, Android API make it possible to tablet apps run on smartphones as well, but it affects our target version. Jona

Re: [Libreoffice] Android versions that we will compile LO for

Thanks for the feedback martin :D ill remove the other apis i have installed for the time being :) On 06/06/2011 12:26 PM, Martin Hosken wrote: I am working with 2 other great individuals in regards to bring LO to android devices. The sdk has support for android version 1.5 all the way up to th

[Libreoffice] Android versions that we will compile LO for

> I am working with 2 other great individuals in regards to bring LO to > android devices. The sdk has support for android version 1.5 all the way > up to the latest 3.1 > > Question becomes what versions do we want to get cross compilation to > work with? Having just come off a low level and

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

On Saturday 04 of June 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 22:06 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote: > > So here is my suggestion: I propose the everyone here head over to the > > Apache Incubator and join the proposal as an initial member. > > Just so you know, I've been following that thr

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37930 --- Comment #139 from Petr Mladek 2

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #138 from Petr Mladek 2011-06-06 03:06:40 PDT --- (In reply to comment #133) > I suggest adding this https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37516 and > fixing if in 3.4.1 release It has already been added few days ago. -- Con

[Libreoffice] Results from LibreOffice TSC call, Thur June 2nd - 14:00 UTC

Hello, following an advice from Petr Mladek I would like to ask you to have a look on (considerations concerning own Extensions repository) and (c

Re: [Libreoffice] A (new?) bug in LibreOffice 3.4 and a missing feature?

On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:35:06 +0200 Axel Reimer wrote: > 2. There is mentioned a unity integration in the release notes of 3.4. > But the menus do not integrate in the global menu and I cannot find an > option in LibreOffice to do so. Is this feature really integrated? > see also: http://wiki.docu

[Libreoffice] development summary: year 2011, week 22

Hi, this time a brief summary of what happened during the 21th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:LO-3.5 development + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for LO-3.3.3 bug fix release + libreoffice-3-4: fixes for LO-3.4.1 bug fix

Re: [Libreoffice] new crashers on master

Hi Caolán, On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:47:02 +0100 Caolán McNamara wrote: > The new binaryurp bridge for out-of-process uno isn't allocating > enough space for small structs, DateTime is 14bytes, and the crasher > in sfx2 is a return of one of those. The x86_64 bridge which the > binaryurp stuff disp

[Libreoffice] REMINDER: Release 3.3.3-rc2 from libreoffice-3-3-3 branch

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 3.3.3-rc2 is today, Jun 6, 2011. If there are any fixes, we are going to do the libreoffice-3.3.3.2 tag in the libreoffice-3-3-3 branch tomorrow. If no blocker is found, rc2 will be marked as final. If there are no fixes, rc1 will be used as final. Com

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][PUSHED-3-4] menu packages for OxygenOffice

Once again with the correct subject. Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai píše v St 25. 05. 2011 v 07:05 +0200: > Hi Developers, > > Last time Fridrich has reverted a patch because it caused problem. It > seems I forget to attach all required patches. > > Can you revert this: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libr

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] menu packages for OxygenOffice

Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai píše v St 25. 05. 2011 v 07:05 +0200: > Hi Developers, > > Last time Fridrich has reverted a patch because it caused problem. It > seems I forget to attach all required patches. > > Can you revert this: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice

[Libreoffice] Duplicate code: hwpreader.cxx

Hi, I had a look at the two methods void HwpReader::makeCaptionStyle(FBoxStyle * fstyle) and void HwpReader::makeFStyle(FBoxStyle * fstyle) which share identical code which I would like to move into a seperate method lcl_addCellLinetype() or some such. I just wonder why when dealing with line