-- Forwarded message --
From: Callme Shane
Date: Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] HI to EVERYONE
To: Fridrich Strba
Yeah thats a great idea, then you can put up on the site, as a separately
downloadable package... and when people pick THE version in th
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Fridrich Strba
wrote:
> The following is convincing me more and more that I should package an
> educational version for those people that need to learn some good
> manners.
Funny, gmail seems to agree since it classified that post as spam for me :-)
Norbert
>
>
Hi,
I have put all folders of the source into one root folder. Then the
files are found. I was told on IRC, that defining symlinks for the
modules in clone might work too.
Regina
Regina Henschel schrieb:
Hi,
next stop in my attempt to build. I have put the files
WNTMSCIinc.zip
WNTMSCIlib.z
If it is not about those, I dont object, although I do not see to much
> use in it (I would have waited for the 4 API and changed all names --
> including the API ones -- then).
I mostly agree with Björn here. In my opinion the reason to drop DLLPOSTFIX
would be to make the makefiles clearer. Not
The following is convincing me more and more that I should package an
educational version for those people that need to learn some good
manners.
Fridrich
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 12:50 +1000, Callme Shane wrote:
> start the program it starts downloading ALL the fucking language
...
> and it's a fuck
TIPOGRAFIA e STAMPA DIGITALE
www.tipoprint.com
Tel: 02 89 92 67 50
Gentile Cliente,
Crediamo sia cosa gradita farvi pervenire questa nostra offerta relativa ai
nostri stampati. E' una occasione da non perdere anche perche' potrete
sfruttare questa OFFERTA fino a Giugno 2011 a sola condizione che
Hi,
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=eced5e6fb21ab9b4d8233cee29ae7d2f223060d3
I need one review for 3-4 (and possibly for 3-3). AFAIK
sysui\desktop\icons\printer.icns is not used so I did not update it.
Thanks,
Andras
___
Li
Hi,
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/extras/commit/?id=1e73670e832ca6f853459832b89b6213f3861a7e
I need one review for 3-4 (and possibly for 3-3).
Thanks,
Andras
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesk
Hi all,
It's hard for me write something now because I've been working on my
thesis last week and it's still not finished yet. Deadline for it is
3.6. but I hope it will be finished sooner and I will be working on
KCachegrind.
So far I think I understood what should be done to KCachegrind for
bett
Hi Marc, all,
[ ooops what a terrible cross post, four lists ;-)
I skipp the project and website list for the moment
and IMO follow ups for my subject (see below)
should be at marketing preferably
devs with an relevant opinion can either join or
hire a gohst writer ;-)
]
Marc Paré wrot
Hi all,
unfortunately I spend the first half of the week in solving build
issues, anyhow after Thorsten's advice to base my job on the
libreoffice-3-4-0 branch instead of on the master branch all work smoothly.
In the second half I started looking through the source code related
to svg export fun
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36443, which changed state.
Bug 36443 Summary: Toolbars do not show in LibreOffice Base 3.3.2 (while making
a form or a report)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36443
What|Old Value
Just to clarify:
On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:27:53 +0200
Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> That would still be a change for LibreOffice4 ...
(if we also change UNO API libs)
> > If there is no objection, I intend to begin the work in a few days.
>
> ... which is why I object.
(in that case).
If it is
Hi Francois,
On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:56:46 +0200
Francois Tigeot wrote:
> In a first stage, the build system would still be using DLLPOSTFIX
> as-is, only with a unique value.
That would still be a change for LibreOffice4 ...
> If there is no objection, I intend to begin the work in a few days.
Hi all,
I did some work on LibreOffice in late 2010. Returning now I see that the
timed release schedule has created several branches that correspond to the
various release configurations. All well and good. The issue I am
experiencing is related to the various issues with standard functionalit
Hi,
next stop in my attempt to build. I have put the files
WNTMSCIinc.zip
WNTMSCIlib.zip
WNTMSCIruntime.zip
into folder
libreoffice-libs-extern-sys-3.4.0.2\moz\zipped
But I get the error:
Died at ./set_soenv line 922.
Checking for prebuilt Mozilla libraries ... not found!
If you don't use th
Hi Christian,
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
Hi Regina, *,
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
I have unpacked the source provided in
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/
I run ./autogen.sh and get this error
checking whether to enable fontconfig support...
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:26:30AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
> IMO, a consistent DLLPOSTFIX name is probably better than removing it
> totally, to avoid e.g. something like libCOMMONNAME${DLLPOSTFIX}.so
> becoming libCOMMONNAME${DLLPOSTFIX}.so colliding painfully with some
> common system li
Hi,
Am 29.05.2011 04:12, schrieb Yasunori ENDO:
Well, there is a German(?) comment like this.
"// Wegen PlugIn's loeschen wir erstmal den Hintergrund"
Clean background first because of plugins.
It's difficult for many developers (of course it includes me!) to
understand German comment.
Even fo
For me it seems to mean "Because of plugins we release the background first"
2011/5/29 Korrawit Pruegsanusak :
> Hello Yasunori,
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 09:12, Yasunori ENDO wrote:
>> I'm not sure this is correct translation.
>> So can you check it?
>
> Sorry, but I don't know german at all.
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> what is the full output? I suspect you have a "dirty" environment,
> i.e. the error is actually caused by macports or fink or darwinports
> stuff, and not by the LO build itself. (What configure options did you
> use?)
>
> It builds fine without X here, and X shall defi
Hi Regina, *,
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> I have unpacked the source provided in
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/
>
> I run ./autogen.sh and get this error
>
> checking whether to enable fontconfig support... ./configure: line 7229:
> syntax err
Le 29/05/2011 14:47, Julien Nabet a écrit :
I think pCollection must be tested against NULL but perhaps it needs
something else.
Of course, if you're ok, I can commit and push on master.
I forgot to tell 2 things :
- I talked about it in IRC yesterday but if the pb of "undefined
behavior" is
Hello,
Since the last merging, I've got this :
Compiling: basic/source/runtime/runtime.cxx
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
/home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/clone/libs-core/basic/source/runtime/runtime.cxx:
In member function 'SbiForStack*
SbiRuntime::FindForStackItemForCollecti
Hi Albert,
Then you are a lot further then I am. I'll leave you to it. Please state
in the ticket when you are working on it. That way nobody will work on
the ticket when you are busy with it.
Greetings,
Rob Snelders
On 28-05-11 21:46, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Sat, May 28, 2011
I'm running the
master~2011-05-26_21.20.06_LibO-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe build
and I get the same error message I got in 3.4.0 Beta2
Does this mean that this fix was not committed to the trunk? Or is it
another similar error?
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentf
Le 25/05/2011 08:53, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit :
> Hi Cédric,
>
> Le 23/05/2011 13:58, Cedric Bosdonnat a écrit :
> [...]
>>
>> It may be that it never worked properly before or that a tiny thing
>> changed in the way to get the list of properties. In fact that function
>> should try to get the
Hi Andras, Michael, Caolan!
I would like to share my findings.
1)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37597 is not related to
my problem. It seems templates are checked only only one level not
recursively in the subdirs.
Maybe a fix need for it.
2) Michael, en-US forlder in added by r
28 matches
Mail list logo
