Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> The DS_Store references the backgroud image from outside of thedmg -
> namely from Thorsten's home-directory.
> But he already created another version (aller guten Dinge sind drei
> :-)) and sent it to me for checking, and that iteration is correct,
> find it attached.
>
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:22:28AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > If removing the suffix is too much work for 3.5,
>
> Nah, why would it be that much work? If it is agreed that those shared
> libraries that use those suffixes are ones that binary extensions don't link
> to anyway, let's just do
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||37487
--- Comment #118 from Alex Thurgoo
build error is solved with this for me. thanks.
-Andy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
vitriol changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||37520
--- Comment #117 from vitriol 2011-05-2
Hi Thorsten, *,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
>> so, it turns out changing those DS_Store files on Snow Leopard makes
>> them incompatible for Tiger - re-did the dance there, please review
>> another DS_Store update for 3.4.0 preferrably - 3 reviews needed I'm
>> afrai
Desire to act like a pornstar? Bang a magic pilule!
http://edupod.com.sg/market.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 00:52 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote:
> Hello kohei,
>
> Sorry for the mistake. This is the updated patch.
So, just to inform the list...
After having IRC chat with him at some length, I have created a feature
branch feature/calc-multiline-input for him to allow him to work on th
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see build-break mails with the error actually
>> inline in them as a first step.
>> This may simply be a outcome of parallel builds ? As a quick-fix maybe
>> having the buildbots auto restart with a single proc build would
Sorry for the late notice...
Joe P.
On May 21, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
>
> <0001-Remove-uneeded-parameter-for-Sort-functionlibs-gui.patch><0002-Move-GetList-to-implementation-filelibs-gui.patch><0003-Replace-List-for-std-vector-in-SfxStringListlibs-gui.patch><0004-Remove-tool
Hello everybody,
I'm sorry for the one day delay in the weekly report but I had a project
deadline today and I was working hard on it. Anyway I spent some time
working on the google project last week as well.
So far I've already converted ~40 files. I'll still need more time in order
to summit the
Hi Caolán,
On Mon, 23 May 2011 15:50:40 +0100
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> I think we have a three things here
> a) broken tinderboxes/build
> b) overly noisy list
> c) unreviewed patches
Right, sorry to have mixed those.
> The needs-X-reviews is a bit tedious alright. Maybe these can be
> bumped o
Hi all,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:06 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Don't apply that one... I had remorse all the week-end for all the
> non-conforming documents that may loose that property. I'll hack a
> better patch to still read the old property.
Here is an augmented patch handling the old a
אם אינך רואה דואר אלקטרוני זה כרואי
לחץ כאן
הדילים המשתלמים בכל הארץ!
ובנוסף טלויזיה 32 אינצ' של SAMSUNG!
Hello kohei,
Sorry for the mistake. This is the updated patch.
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Anurag Jain wrote:
> Hello Kohei,
>
> Please find the patch below and let me know your feedback.
>
> Thanks and regards.
> --
> Anurag Jain
> Final yr B.Tech CSE
> SASTRA University
> Thanjavur(T.N.)-
Caolan,
in filters:dfb05afaec63e4537a18947695106052574b6593
you removed a 'pointless' makefile... as it turned out that makefile
was apparently preventing --enable-werror from being enforced on that
particular piece...
that is why all the sudden the tinderbox that build with
--enable-werror start
> The empty one is from unxiosr.mk and I suspect the platform doesn't build
Indeed not, unxiosr is the just started extremely unfinished partial port to
iOS ;) Far from ready, if it ever will be. Shared libraries / dynamic modules
can't even be used for non-system code on iOS so no "DLL suffix"
Hi Michael,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:49:58PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> If we are talking about the 'li' suffix in libswli.so - then I don't
> see much good reason for that really.
> Presumably extensions use only the standard, stable UNO APIs - and none
> of them use fooli.so
Hi,
While attempting to profile a systematic crash on Mac OSX :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37487
I see this in the output of the assembly language instructions :
Illegal operations
0x27b72399 0x06
in
connectivity::OSQLParseNod
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 23:50 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> But all in all in my opinion we should rework the whole pDefaultList
> part in master. I think it is bad style to create a boost::ptr_vector
> with new as long as it is not necessary, so if you agree I would
> rewrite these few lines for
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
[...]
> IMO with the tinderbox mails, they don't give the actual error. I'd like
> to see build-break mails with the error actually inline in them as a
> first step.
>
> This may simply be a outcome of parallel builds ? As a quick-fix maybe
>
23.05.2011 05:17, Noel Power пишет:
But, it seems in summary Cntrl+Z didn't enable the toolbar redo, Andreas
made some patch and it it didn't fix things completely, I hope that is
an accurate.
Yes.
Now we move onto bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37405
which you think is someho
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 16:45 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 23:00 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> > Caolan did push some bigendianfixes for lotuswordpro filter that
> > includes the above change, not sure how long it would take to fully
> > make it compatible/working on bigen
> Looks like a beautiful patch to me. And yes, we shouldn't have #ifdef
> WIN conditionals in files built only on windows (I hope) ;-)
Actually I think OOo uses WIN to mean 16-bit Windows 3.x...(and Win9x?), at
least in some contexts. It is WNT that it uses to indicate 32-bit Windows.
See for i
Hi Jean,
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:16 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> I tried to use gdb with my last build for libreoffice-3-4 branch (this
> morning). This time, oosplash.bin crashed after a moment of inactivity.
> It did not eat 100% CPU, only seemed to do nothing (futex_wait_queue_me)
> and
Hi Plino,
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 10:01 -0700, plino wrote:
> May I suggest that all the translation files for the Windows setup (after
> unpacking) are placed in a subfolder (e.g. trans) and the setup.ini modified
> accordingly?
Of course - if you come up with a patch :-) I'd poke around i
Hi Francois,
If we are talking about the 'li' suffix in libswli.so - then I don't
see much good reason for that really.
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 20:03 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> Where can I find more about this ? I've found some openoffice.org web pages
> about extensions but nothing re
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 23:00 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Caolan did push some bigendianfixes for lotuswordpro filter that
> includes the above change, not sure how long it would take to fully
> make it compatible/working on bigendian..
Ah - yes, I see he has a nice PPC machine somew
Hi Marco,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 00:10 +0200, Marco wrote:
> after the last "pull -r && make all" when I start soffice I got the
> following error:
> "libvcllx.so: undefined symbol: _ZN3utl10ConfigItemC2ERKN3rtl8OUStringEs"
Ok - nasty. I hope you did a './g pull -r' in the top-level and th
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:14 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>
> Hi Kohei,
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 10:08:38 -0400
> Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> > Because that's what we decided to do during our TSC meeting IIRC. The
> > premise was that we would do merge regularly into master, ~at least
> > once p
Hi Christina,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 10:02 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
> the attached patch removes __cdecl and uses SAL_CALL instead. For future
> work: I suppose that I can omit files having win32 in their path?
Looks like a beautiful patch to me. And yes, we shouldn't have #ifdef
WIN
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 23 May 2011 16:10:06 +0100
Michael Meeks
wrote:
> Which is bad; no-one denies that - *but* it also seems like
> you just saw it was broken, and left it - rather than fixing it: it
> also sounds like the problem was extremely trivial - some printf's
> left in some module
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:03 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > 2) I insert a jpg picture from file, i have :
> > Error: SolarMutex not locked From File
> > /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/clone/libs-gui/vcl/source/app/dbggui.cxx
> >
> > at Line 1979
> I never saw those, but it could be
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier <
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sampha, *,
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Samphan Raruenrom
> wrote:
> > I've done a small research on preferred fonts for Thai in
> > Windows/Linux/MacOSX by consulting several communities,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Petr Mladek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36631
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 03:43 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> +1 from me
And me - picked to the -3-4-0 branch.
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing li
Hi Kohei,
On Mon, 23 May 2011 10:08:38 -0400
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Because that's what we decided to do during our TSC meeting IIRC. The
> premise was that we would do merge regularly into master, ~at least
> once per week as we did during the 3.3 release. But for some reason
> we haven't mer
Hi Bjoern,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:12 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:00:08 +0100
> > Also, my experience of building master is that it is not
.
> > Of the dozen times I've pulled and updated
> > recently - my build has failed perhaps 5 times, of which 3+ have been
>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 37317, which changed state.
Bug 37317 Summary: Select comments print position in print dialog and closing
crashes writer
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37317
What|Old Value
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 14:02 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a proposal to improve our handling of patching and commits on
> master.
> LibreOffice is aiming for a welcoming and inviting culture to aloow
> newcomer get invaolved fast. This is why we have a very lax requirement
Hi Sampha, *,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
> I've done a small research on preferred fonts for Thai in
> Windows/Linux/MacOSX by consulting several communities, font developers and
> authority.
Cood to hear, as most of us will not really know Thai fonts and their
dif
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:56 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 06:39:52 -0600
> "Tor Lillqvist"
> wrote:
>
> > Well, the policy, at least as some of us (me included) have
> > understood it, was that the development branch gets merged into
> > master regularly, so no need to com
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 16:04 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > pushed on 3-4, still needs one review for 3-4-0 (got another one on
> >
> ACKed & pushed by Fridrich & me into -3-4-0
This broke my *vanilla* powerpc multiarch build on Fedora 12, i.e
libgcc_s.so is just a ld
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:29 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi Tor,
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 04:52:26 -0600
> "Tor Lillqvist"
> wrote:
>
> > Seems to be fixed already in a different way in -3-4
> Why that ever been done? Fixing something on the release branch, but not
> on the development bran
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> pushed on 3-4, still needs one review for 3-4-0 (got another one on
>
ACKed & pushed by Fridrich & me into -3-4-0
-- Thorsten
pgpvsuksArioS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedes
> Together with svptest, it excersises the headless mode - so you can
> watch vcl render to some framebuffer device. Still useful code.
OK. So shouldn't we then fix the code to work correctly, not just get rid of
compiler warnings?
I.e., in
+nBytes = write( nSocket, rCommand.getSt
Hi,
please note that the commit deadline for 3.4.0-rc2 is today. We are
going to do the libreoffice-3.4.0.2 tag in the libreoffice-3-4-0 branch
tomorrow. If no blocker is found, rc2 will be marked as final.
Commit rules for the new libreoffice-3-4-0 branch:
+ commits approved by 3 peopl
Hi Matus,
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 13:58 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> This week I've finished playing with commandimages. Result is about
> 70kB (cca 3%) save in size of images*.zip.
Nice - so, 3% doesn't sound like much - but the in-memory cost of
duplicating all those path strings is quite
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Normally, for code that goes into LO. I don't think we want to
> introduce perror() calls; they are fairly pointless there. Normal
> users will never see the output.
>
> But yeah, this is for code in a "workben" directory, aren't those
> just random old test and whatnot stuf
On Monday 23 of May 2011, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > We need 2 more reviews for the libreoffice-3-4-0 branch.
>
> +1 from me
+1, pushed to 3-4-0.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 37429, which changed state.
Bug 37429 Summary: EDITING: Crash when copy / paste table from Writer
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37429
What|Old Value |New Value
---
On Monday 23 of May 2011, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> Pushed to master.
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=d30c66cb1954103a159
>da2ef82dba4bf9685844f
>
> Would be nice if we could get 2 additional reviews for 3-4-0.
+1, pushed to 3-4-0.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
_
On Mon, 23 May 2011 06:39:52 -0600
"Tor Lillqvist"
wrote:
> Well, the policy, at least as some of us (me included) have
> understood it, was that the development branch gets merged into
> master regularly, so no need to commit fixes to both. But yeah, it
> does now seem safer to commit to both th
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:36 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 01:12:38AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:02 AM, David Tardon wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > could someone sign-off this small patch?
>>
>> David, it would be easier if you actually attach the p
Sorry, got my words mixed up. What I mean was obviously:
Well, the policy, at least as some of us (me included) have understood it, was
that the stable branch gets merged into the development branch (master)
regularly, so no need to commit fixes to both. But yeah, it does now seem safer
to comm
> Fixing something on the release branch, but not
> on the development branch is downright stupid.
Well, the policy, at least as some of us (me included) have understood it, was
that the development branch gets merged into master regularly, so no need to
commit fixes to both. But yeah, it does
On Friday 20 of May 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:30 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:33 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=450ce7ee526
> > > >72e77c6e5fe601d0ed3c416a60b16 to 3-4 and eve
I've done a small research on preferred fonts for Thai in
Windows/Linux/MacOSX by consulting several communities, font developers
and authority. Here is the modification that the Thai community decide
that best for Thai locale. It will help users when exchanging documents
between these platform
Hi Tor,
On Mon, 23 May 2011 04:52:26 -0600
"Tor Lillqvist"
wrote:
> Seems to be fixed already in a different way in -3-4
Why that ever been done? Fixing something on the release branch, but not
on the development branch is downright stupid. And it is not getting
better (or worse) by Sun/Oracle
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:00:08 +0100
Michael Meeks
wrote:
> Also, my experience of building master is that it is not
> -that- bad: by -that- bad, I mean the pre-CWS nightmare of Hamburg
> times (as an example). Of the dozen times I've pulled and updated
> recently - my build has f
Hi Timo,
On 2011-05-23 at 01:55 +0200, Timo wrote:
> this is what I have done so far:
> - Searched several libraries that parse wikicode
> - Used a python library which parses wikisyntax
> - Used a python library which outputs docbook-files
> - Discovered an implementation of CHM-Compiler in free
Hi all,
Don't apply that one... I had remorse all the week-end for all the
non-conforming documents that may loose that property. I'll hack a
better patch to still read the old property.
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 17:33 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some people complained about LO not
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 04:21 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> >>> On 2011-05-23 at 00:50, wrote:
> > The problem here is that you are not allowed to access any element as long
> > as the ptr_vector is empty.
>
> > I think we should include this patch in 3-4-0.
>
> Another crash introduced by a "Remo
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 22:50 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Error: XHierarchicalNameAccess: Other/IsSquaredPageModeOther/ApplyCharUnit
> /org.openoffice.Office.Writer/Layout/Other/IsSquaredPageModeOther/ApplyCharUnit
>
> From File
> /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/unotools/source/config/co
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 07:30 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> No suggestion to help me to fix this bug ?
> I think this bug is a bad communication about the LibO's involment for ODF.
Sure, read below:
> Le 15/05/2011 11:31, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I try
2011/5/23 Tor Lillqvist
> >>> On 2011-05-23 at 00:50, wrote:
> > The problem here is that you are not allowed to access any element as
> long
> > as the ptr_vector is empty.
>
> > I think we should include this patch in 3-4-0.
>
> Another crash introduced by a "Remove DECLARE_LIST" change, I am
Hi Tor,
On 2011-05-23 at 05:40 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > The current state is in integration/dev300_m106, I'll be grateful for any
> > help there.
>
> Is there any email or wiki writeup on what is the recommended workflow, etc?
> I would love to help, but I don't know what to do.
I am a
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:20 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:55 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > That bug was badly fixed (by me) quite some times ago. Here is a
> > correct fix (why did I add that code at all ?). Could you review it
> > and push it in 3.4 and 3
> The current state is in integration/dev300_m106, I'll be grateful for any
> help there.
Is there any email or wiki writeup on what is the recommended workflow, etc? I
would love to help, but I don't know what to do.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing l
Hi Tor,
On 2011-05-23 at 04:52 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Seems to be fixed already in a different way in -3-4 (and presumably
> -3-4-0) by Kohei in 06b6df6759929073e917ae0fa7e819407d3e2555 ,
> "fdo#36288: Fixed a crasher on Base" on Apr 20. Why the crash still
> happens then, no idea. Anyway,
Hi there,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:55 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> That bug was badly fixed (by me) quite some times ago. Here is a
> correct fix (why did I add that code at all ?). Could you review it
> and push it in 3.4 and 3.4.0?
Hmm.
> More cleanup is needed but it'll end up in
On Mon, 23 May 2011 13:08:56 +0200
Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> In case that's not solved yet - you want either gnumake 3.82, or a
> patched 3.81 - Björn had a helpful list of needed fixes somewhere.
Here is a package for ubuntu/debian:
https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/17
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 10:18 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> I have taken a look at the class and all it does is provide
> string resources via the good ol' tools ressource manager.
Beautiful :-) I suspect (hope) that this impl. behavioural detail can
be tweaked, and that only the wizar
Andreas Radke wrote:
> /bin/sh: line 1: 10897 Segmentation fault make -r -j10
>
In case that's not solved yet - you want either gnumake 3.82, or a
patched 3.81 - Björn had a helpful list of needed fixes somewhere.
HTH,
-- Thorsten
pgpS8hvQmGKWZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Andreas Radke wrote:
> /bin/sh: line 1: 10897 Segmentation fault make -r -j10
>
In case that's not solved yet - you want either gnumake 3.82, or a
patched 3.81 - Björn had a helpful list of needed fixes somewhere.
HTH,
-- Thorsten
pgphz10SyfG5v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Hi all,
pushed on 3-4, still needs one review for 3-4-0 (got another one on
IRC).
Best,
Bjoern
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hi Bjoern,
Lots of interesting ideas in your mail.
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 04:10 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Kernel style subsystem maintainers would be great IMHO, but I had the
> feeling that there is a general opposition against a 'too branchy'
> development model.
So - he
> so, it turns out changing those DS_Store files on Snow Leopard makes
> them incompatible for Tiger - re-did the dance there, please review
> another DS_Store update for 3.4.0 preferrably - 3 reviews needed I'm
> afraid.
>
> Additionally, the Mac language pack .dmg had the OOo icon back since
> t
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:17:19AM +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
> Hi,
> >> (what stands Stt for?)
> once again: Stt means what? The answer might help to understand
> what's going on in that method.
Start :) I guess the original developer of the code wanted to save some
typing...
D.
> Michael Meeks wrote:
> > These files changed size from 32x32 to 26x26 in this - that is what you
> > wanted ?
> >
> Yes.
>
Pushed to 3-4 - two more reviews for -3-4-0 please.
Thanks,
-- Thorsten
pgpcNTsLdvqv0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Hi all,
That bug was badly fixed (by me) quite some times ago. Here is a correct
fix (why did I add that code at all ?). Could you review it and push it
in 3.4 and 3.4.0?
More cleanup is needed but it'll end up in master: some options aren't
used at all in that area.
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonna
Seems to be fixed already in a different way in -3-4 (and presumably -3-4-0) by
Kohei in 06b6df6759929073e917ae0fa7e819407d3e2555 , "fdo#36288: Fixed a crasher
on Base" on Apr 20. Why the crash still happens then, no idea. Anyway,
cherry-pick fails.
I guess a merge of -3-4 to master is long ove
> We need 2 more reviews for the libreoffice-3-4-0 branch.
+1 from me
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>> > could someone sign-off this small patch?
+1 from me
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>>> On 2011-05-23 at 00:50, wrote:
> The problem here is that you are not allowed to access any element as long
> as the ptr_vector is empty.
> I think we should include this patch in 3-4-0.
Another crash introduced by a "Remove DECLARE_LIST" change, I am so not
surprised.
+1 from me. Push thi
Andras Timar píše v Po 23. 05. 2011 v 11:50 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> Fix for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37433
> German hyphenation is broken with the bundled German (de-DE)
> dictionary, version 2011-05-05
Great. It really helped. Signed off and pushed into the libreoffice-3-4
branch, s
On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:51:59 +0200
Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please review:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/components/commit/?id=19ed36590e990b5281da9c54bd962031bd56ae82
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=f25b836319678ab333a1a997cc7fdadfedad8e
On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:08:23 +0200
Cedric Bosdonnat
wrote:
> Simplifying this kind of things is good, +1 from me.
Another charming +1 from Fridrich on IRC, pushed. Feel free to revert
if problems arise.
Best,
Bjoern
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
__
Hi all,
please review:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/components/commit/?id=19ed36590e990b5281da9c54bd962031bd56ae82
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=f25b836319678ab333a1a997cc7fdadfedad8e08
* various forms.OGridControlModel tests segfaulted
* root cause is t
Hi,
Fix for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37433
German hyphenation is broken with the bundled German (de-DE)
dictionary, version 2011-05-05
Andras
>From 2e41ef5cd4ff9f486187501ea5b8fb8a8cd8120f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andras Timar
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:41:16 +0200
Subje
Normally, for code that goes into LO. I don't think we want to introduce
perror() calls; they are fairly pointless there. Normal users will never see
the output.
But yeah, this is for code in a "workben" directory, aren't those just random
old test and whatnot stuff that aren't even built? What
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 03:38 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> Ok, after having a second look at the tinderbox page I pushed this
> patch because at least the Linux FC11 x86_64 gcj 1.5.0 tinderbox
> failed due this error and it seems to be safe to me.
Good work :-) if it is obviously wrong,
+1 from me
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 16:44 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Opinions?
Looks good to me ;-) but then I always run ooinstall manually myself. I
assume that smoketest is headless these days and doesn't flash up
annoying GUI windows and/or block for user input on any platform ?
ATB
Michael Meeks wrote:
> These files changed size from 32x32 to 26x26 in this - that is what you
> wanted ?
>
Yes.
-- Thorsten
pgpm67RUvBXA0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 01:12:38AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:02 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > could someone sign-off this small patch?
>
> David, it would be easier if you actually attach the patch :-)
Indeed it would :)
D.
>From 846010092e0a10c5423a26
On 20/05/11 12:53, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I do agree. but then it should be possible to use a nice review-tools
and still have the generated review comment posted in the the ML
I mean, when someone add a patch to be review in the tool that can
generate a post to the ML with the patch (either i
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 23:04 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> hey guys i would like to try and pull all the modules
So do: $ ./g pull -r
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreO
Hi Thorsten,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 02:37 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> sorry folks, what I had running was not what I pushed - another
> patch attached, that clamps the galaxy mimetype icons to 26^2 (they
> errorneously were 32^2).
Sigh - no doubt it is better; you have my approval for
On 20/05/11 15:53, Clio wrote:
Please, see here, that the patch actually added 1 line:
http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/diff/DEV300_m106/basctl/source/basicide/baside2b.cxx?r2=%2FDEV300_m106%2Fbasctl%2Fsource%2Fbasicide%2Fbaside2b.cxx%40275666%3Ad11c441ed074&r1=%2FDEV300_m106%2Fbasctl%
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
