[Libreoffice] Free antied blu-colored tabz with every order.

2011-05-22 Thread Cornelius
The only greatpil u need to get bigger gun. http://eseninojesusbq.gov.co/far.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] about bug fdo 36519 ("writer8" instead of "ODF Text" in options UI)

2011-05-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, No suggestion to help me to fix this bug ? I think this bug is a bad communication about the LibO's involment for ODF. Best regards JBF Le 15/05/2011 11:31, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit : > Hi, > > I try to fix the bug fdo 36519. With the help of Cédric I found that > commenting four lines i

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Updated galaxy mimetype toolbar icons

2011-05-22 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *, sorry folks, what I had running was not what I pushed - another patch attached, that clamps the galaxy mimetype icons to 26^2 (they errorneously were 32^2). I'd love to get this into 3.4.0 if at all possible - so 3 reviews needed. Cheers, -- Thorsten From 805b0738b46593ccda228e18ac395093d

[Libreoffice] Report [GSoC] [helpfiles]

2011-05-22 Thread Timo
Hello everybody, this is what I have done so far: - Searched several libraries that parse wikicode - Used a python library which parses wikisyntax - Used a python library which outputs docbook-files - Discovered an implementation of CHM-Compiler in freepascal These are the tasks for the future: -

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in scripting-beanshell

2011-05-22 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 07:52:11PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: > dmake: Error: -- `/build/src/build/solver/340/unxlngx6.pro/bin/bsh.jar' not > found, and can't be made See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/11243 as a potential candidate thread where the fi

[Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][GSoC 2011][svgexport] build issue: "libvcllx.so: undefined symbol: _ZN3utl10ConfigItemC2ERKN3rtl8OUStringEs"

2011-05-22 Thread Marco
Hi, after the last "pull -r && make all" when I start soffice I got the following error: "libvcllx.so: undefined symbol: _ZN3utl10ConfigItemC2ERKN3rtl8OUStringEs" the library belongs to the vcl module, the symbol: "utl::ConfigItem::ConfigItem(rtl::OUString const&, short)" to the unotools module.

[Libreoffice] [Review] Patch for fdo#37429: crash when copy/paste table from writer to calc

2011-05-22 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello, here is a short patch for fdo#37429 which is also listed at the annoying bug page. The problem here is that you are not allowed to access any element as long as the ptr_vector is empty. But all in all in my opinion we should rework the whole pDefaultList part in master. I think it is bad

[Libreoffice] HackersEvent Arnhem, May 28

2011-05-22 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi, OT on this list, but also very relevant for those in The Netherlands/Flanders: The second Dutch LibreOffice HackersEvent http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/NL/bijeenkomst_11-05-28 (plus also meeting Nl LibreOffice/OpenOffice.org users) Ciao - Cor -- - http://nl.libreoffice.org - giv

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] - One line patche - Export hyperlinks to .doc

2011-05-22 Thread Knut Olav Bøhmer
Hi, Related to this bug. http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115297 2011/5/20 Knut Olav Bøhmer > Hi, > > Exporting hyperlinks to .doc is done wrong in LibreOffice Writer. There is > a flag (hlstmfIsAbsolute) that is set to 1. It should be 0, because all > links are exported relative.

[Libreoffice] pulling modules prior to compilation

2011-05-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
hey guys i would like to try and pull all the modules prior to running autogen.sh? -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] cppunit test fails in lotuswordpro / breaks the build on Mac/PPC

2011-05-22 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Michael, *, On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 23:25 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > [lotuswordpro bigendian problem] >> If the code used >>    *pStream >> nTag; >> instead, the comparison would result in the correct result. > >        can we commi

[Libreoffice] Writer, errors in debug mode

2011-05-22 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, Here are some errors I have in debug mode. 1) Once LO is opened, when I select Writer to launch it, I have : FcPreMatchSubstititution "Thorndale AMT" bipw=5020 -> "Liberation Serif" bipw=5025 FcPreMatchSubstititution "Albany AMT" bipw=5020 -> "Liberation Sans" bipw=5025 FcPreMatchSubsti

[Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][GSoC 2011][svgexport] weekly report

2011-05-22 Thread Marco
Hi all, this week I went on experimenting with LibreOffice debugging, I also write down some notes on the wiki in the How to Debug page on debugging with gdb and on using the DDD front-end. Moreover I have successfully configured the Eclipse CDT Debug front-end, so in case there is interest I can

Re: [Libreoffice] breathing master

2011-05-22 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Hmm, somehow I feel the above suggestions bring in way too much process that takes time away from coding. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#37001Update license text

2011-05-22 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, There is an updated, more accurate, more complete and better formatted license document attached to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37001. See details in the bug, especially Comment 8. I would like to update license documents in 3-4 and 3-4-0, please approve. Thanks, Andras

Re: [Libreoffice] breathing master

2011-05-22 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2011 17:00:19 +0200 > > Just as a sidenote: gerrit looks awesome and we should try it before > testing Reviewboard. I wonder though, given its tight git integration, > if we should really try a setup before onegit is aroun

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness

2011-05-22 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Tor, On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:43:52AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > What I would like to know is if there's still a reason to use this suffix > > in 2011. > > Only backward compatibility of binary extensions, I think? But how many of > the OOo/LO shared libraries do (binary) extensions l

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness

2011-05-22 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Bjoern, On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 07:36:27PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2011 18:45:53 +0200 > Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > What I would like to know is if there's still a reason to use this > > suffix in 2011. > Unfortunately, yes: compatibility for C++ extensions -- at le

[Libreoffice] build error in scripting-beanshell

2011-05-22 Thread Andreas Radke
Entering /build/src/build/scripting/util/provider/beanshell Entering /build/src/build/scripting/util/provider/javascript /usr/share/java/apache-ant/bin/ant -Dprj=../.. -Dprjname=scripting -Dant.build.javac.source=1.6 -Dant.build.javac.target=1.6 -Ddebug=off -Doptimize=on -Dtarget=javaexamples

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness

2011-05-22 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> What I would like to know is if there's still a reason to use this suffix in > 2011. Only backward compatibility of binary extensions, I think? But how many of the OOo/LO shared libraries do (binary) extensions link to anyway? --tml ___ LibreOffic

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness

2011-05-22 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Francois, On Sun, 22 May 2011 18:45:53 +0200 Francois Tigeot wrote: > I'm sure there was a good reason to use it in 1988. Or maybe not, I > can't possibly pretend to know. Probably not. I'd rather guess it was a workaround to a problem that would have deserved a proper solution back then. >

[Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness

2011-05-22 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, I've recently created a pkgsrc package for LibreOffice, and been burned by the DLLPOSTFIX / gb_Library_DLLPOSTFIX suffix added to library file names. I'm sure there was a good reason to use it in 1988. Or maybe not, I can't possibly pretend to know. What I would like to know is if there's sti

Re: [Libreoffice] breathing master

2011-05-22 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Sun, 22 May 2011 17:00:19 +0200 Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 09:04:11PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud > wrote: > > There does not seems to be the notion of 'multiple approval' (iow > > approval is 0 or 1), but that could probably be added over time if > > we go with this tool > >

Re: [Libreoffice] breathing master

2011-05-22 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 09:04:11PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > There does not seems to be the notion of 'multiple approval' (iow > approval is 0 or 1), but that could probably be added over time if we > go with this tool I haven't tried myself, but see here for example: https://review.sour

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 zephy...@hotmail.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36766 -- Configure bugmail: https:

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #116 from zephy...@hotmail.ch 2011-05-22 07:45:07 PDT --- I suggest to add bug 36766: very severe regression, hit all Impress users, and can be a blocker for a lot of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs

[Libreoffice] Unifying dev-install

2011-05-22 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, "make dev-install" is doing something rather annoying: It installs another copy of LibreOffice next to the one created by the smoketest. Someone running smoketest (and everyone should, as you know) and dev-install will end up with two copies of a full LibreOffice installation. The attache

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Android Port

2011-05-22 Thread rcsilv...@gmail.com
Hello, all! Sorry about this sooo late reply - I didn't give up, I'm just busy but LO for Honeycomb is one of my top priorities now. I'll answer inline. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 05:57, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Tor, > > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 23:59 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > Or 2) Adapt the

Re: [Libreoffice] Bug fdo36158 - EasyHack: UI:Find&Replace dialog "Notes" instead of "Comments"

2011-05-22 Thread Julien Nabet
Le 22/05/2011 11:29, Andras Timar a écrit : 2011/5/22 Julien Nabet: I only put a comment for this fdo in the tracker, I didn't change the status : neither at "Assigned" (to whom ?) nor at "Closed" (I don't know when translations will be updated). Assigned: to you (but it's optional). You can ma

[Libreoffice] [GSoC] performance improvement report #0

2011-05-22 Thread Matúš Kukan
Hi all, This week I've finished playing with commandimages. Result is about 70kB (cca 3%) save in size of images*.zip. Unfortunately I'm not yet finished with my bachelor's thesis and cannot work on Libreoffice 8hours/day next week. Next could be merging libraries into larger ones. Best regards,

Re: [Libreoffice] NetBSD build fixes

2011-05-22 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 01:35:36PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > The only drawback is, you have to add /usr/pkg/lib in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > otherwise the "system" libraries won't be found. > > That looks like we need to

Re: [Libreoffice] NetBSD build fixes

2011-05-22 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > The old IA64 configuration file explicitly linked crt0.o but since it didn't > work anyway, I removed it. Ok. > I have unified all the NetBSD dmake configuration files in a single one > which uses unxgcc.mk and fixed all other iss

Re: [Libreoffice] NetBSD build fixes

2011-05-22 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 03:44:59PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 03:29:27PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > NetBSD libc exports almost nothing in comparison: > > It's in /usr/lib/crt0.o, which is linked into all executables AFAIK. > > > There must be something els

[Libreoffice] [GOSC][Patch] multi line input bar

2011-05-22 Thread Anurag Jain
Hello Kohei, Please find the patch below and let me know your feedback. Thanks and regards. -- Anurag Jain Final yr B.Tech CSE SASTRA University Thanjavur(T.N.)-613402 diff --git a/sc/source/ui/app/inputwin.cxx b/sc/source/ui/app/inputwin.cxx index 8019fee..c209a4f 100644 --- a/sc/source/ui/app/

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replace DBG_ stuff in calc with OSL_ equivalents

2011-05-22 Thread Jacek Wolszczak
Hi, I am sending links to patches uploaded to dropbox. I wasn't sure if 1MB of attachments would be welcome here. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/174726/patches/0001-Replace-DBG_-with-OSL_-in-calc-chart2.patch http://dl.dropbox.com/u/174726/patches/0002-Replace-DBG_-with-OSL_-in-sc-source-core.patch http

Re: [Libreoffice] Bug fdo36158 - EasyHack: UI:Find&Replace dialog "Notes" instead of "Comments"

2011-05-22 Thread Andras Timar
2011/5/22 Julien Nabet : > > I only put a comment for this fdo in the tracker, I didn't change the status > : neither at "Assigned" (to whom ?) nor at "Closed" (I don't know when > translations will be updated). Assigned: to you (but it's optional). You can make it resolved/fixed. Noone knows when

[Libreoffice] She desires you gigantic lovetoy in her now!

2011-05-22 Thread Sadie
Dream to act like a porn star? Dive into a bluemed! http://saldogas.net/5pe81ml.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Bug fdo36158 - EasyHack: UI:Find&Replace dialog "Notes" instead of "Comments"

2011-05-22 Thread Julien Nabet
Le 22/05/2011 07:35, Andras Timar a écrit : Hi, 2011/5/22 Julien Nabet: 2) The pb is CB_NOTES and the translations should be changed in l10n too. a) I don't know how to change CB_NOTES from l10n module (they don't appear in the "dev repository") b) Except French translation, how to have quickly

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem with installation Libre Office

2011-05-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 22/05/2011 08:17, poindim_bin a écrit : > Hello > > I've tried to install the latest version 3.3.2 but unlike the previous > one 3.3.04 I didn't have any problem with, I can't get through the > installation of this one. I thought it could have been due to a bad > download, so I renewed it twice