Hello
I've tried to install the latest version 3.3.2 but unlike the previous
one 3.3.04 I didn't have any problem with, I can't get through the
installation of this one. I thought it could have been due to a bad
download, so I renewed it twice but unfortunately it still doesn't work.
Windo
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:02 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could someone sign-off this small patch?
David, it would be easier if you actually attach the patch :-)
Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.f
Hi,
could someone sign-off this small patch?
D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
2011/5/21 Jean-Baptiste Faure :
> Le 20/05/2011 19:27, Andras Timar a écrit :
>> 2011/5/20 Cedric Bosdonnat :
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I just fixed some UI problem with CTL. Could you please review the fix,
>>> sign it off and push it?
>>>
>>> The problem that may appear here is that I needed to reduce
Hi,
2011/5/22 Julien Nabet :
> 2) The pb is CB_NOTES and the translations should be changed in l10n too.
> a) I don't know how to change CB_NOTES from l10n module (they don't appear
> in the "dev repository")
> b) Except French translation, how to have quickly all the translations ?
>
> I prepared
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 07:35:44PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud
>> wrote:
>>> I've been trying to find alternative to reviewboard... Google is
>>> failing me so far :-(
>>> If someone k
Title: Greetings
Greetings,
My name is Richard Davis and I would like to know if you use deburring equipment for finishing parts that need a higher polish finish.Please let me know if you have an interested in this machine or if you arelooking for something different.
We offer test & evalu
Hi *,
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> [...]
> I've been trying to find alternative to reviewboard... Google is
> failing me so far :-(
> If someone know of similar project, please let me know...
OK, then let me throw in patchwork once again - not a review-tool by
itsel
Hi Thorsten, Norbet, all,
On Sun, 22 May 2011 01:29:37 +0200
Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> > Another route is the 'sub-system maintainer' route. where patch and
> > commit are channeled to sub-system maintainer that regularly but in
> > a controlled fashion push batch of commits to the 'official' ma
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 07:35:44PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud
> wrote:
>> I've been trying to find alternative to reviewboard... Google is
>> failing me so far :-(
>> If someone know of similar project, please let me know...
>
> Not exactly sur
Ok, after having a second look at the tinderbox page I pushed this patch
because at least the Linux FC11 x86_64 gcj 1.5.0 tinderbox failed due this
error and it seems to be safe to me.
2011/5/22 Markus Mohrhard
> No I think you're right. I run into the same problem.
>
> But it seems that Caolan
No I think you're right. I run into the same problem.
But it seems that Caolan accidentally inserted two debug messages. The
following patch removes them.
I don't think that constructor and destructor should always write to stderr,
but I'm a bit confused that no tinderbox failed.
Regards,
Markus
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 07:35:44PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud
> wrote:
>> I've been trying to find alternative to reviewboard... Google is
>> failing me so far :-(
>> If someone know of similar project, please let me know...
>
> Not exactly sur
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 07:35:44PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> I've been trying to find alternative to reviewboard... Google is
> failing me so far :-(
> If someone know of similar project, please let me know...
Not exactly sure what 'reviewboard' means here, but if we're at tools
wrt. patc
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
>> > - Prevent patches to get lost in space on the ML.
>> > - Prevent patches to hang in a "needs one more review" cycle.
>>
> Both are non-issues in my mind. The former happens very, very
> seldomly, the latter is not solved by Björn's prop
Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > - Response time to "you broke the master"-emails by tinderboxes are way
> > too low -- the default assumption seems to be: somebody else broke the
> > master. This is having further implications as per
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory
> >
> The o
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> > I can confirm this behaviour on the normal LO master repositories
> > yesterday, not to mention anongit access to the repos is super slow.
>
> After many attempts I finally succeeded to clone translations repository.
> I don't know why. ;-)
>
Hi *,
so - this seems
Hello,
1) I found that "Notes" was in svx/source/dialog/srchdlg.src, the text
of "CheckBox CB_NOTES" (line 310)
So, it could be changed there except that CB_NOTES should be changed in
CB_COMMENTS
With Opengrok, I searched all the CB_NOTES, there are some in svx, 1 in
testautomation and 1 in he
The fact that our source is spread among 20 git repositories has been
a source of grief and quite a common complaint from people joining the
project.
Recently there ave been some tests conducted to see if having just one
big git repo would be viable from a performace stand-point.
Björn Michaelsen
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a proposal to improve our handling of patching and commits on
> master.
> LibreOffice is aiming for a welcoming and inviting culture to aloow
> newcomer get invaolved fast. This is why we have a very lax requirement
>
I like your idea, just one question, who gonna push patches to unreviewed
branch???
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Le 11/03/2011 13:37, Pantelis Koukousoulas a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> This is a patch originally developed against openoffice in summer 2009
> that has not yet been accepted due to, in my opinion, purely bureocratic
> reasons / lack of interest from main devs
> (see http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bu
Hi all
May I suggest that all the translation files for the Windows setup (after
unpacking) are placed in a subfolder (e.g. trans) and the setup.ini modified
accordingly?
I.e. from
[languages]
count=104
default=1033
lang1=1078,trans_af.mst
...
to
[languages]
count=104
default=1033
lang1=1078,t
Seems pretty OK to me :)
2011/5/21 Bjoern Michaelsen :
> Hi all,
>
> here is a proposal to improve our handling of patching and commits on
> master.
> LibreOffice is aiming for a welcoming and inviting culture to aloow
> newcomer get invaolved fast. This is why we have a very lax requirement
> on
Le 20/05/2011 19:27, Andras Timar a écrit :
> 2011/5/20 Cedric Bosdonnat :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just fixed some UI problem with CTL. Could you please review the fix,
>> sign it off and push it?
>>
>> The problem that may appear here is that I needed to reduce the
>> available space for some strings.
Le 21/05/2011 16:16, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit :
> Le 16/05/2011 16:34, Michael Meeks a écrit :
[...]
I think this one is more complete :
> jbf@tux-laptop:~/LibO/libreoffice-3-4$ gdb
> /home/jbf/LibO/libreoffice-3-4/install/program/oosplash.bin 23730
> GNU gdb (GDB) 7.1-ubuntu
> Copyright (C)
Le 16/05/2011 16:34, Michael Meeks a écrit :
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 11:04 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
>> I have a problem with oosplash.bin, both with LibO 3.4 beta-x and my own
>> builds under Ubuntu 10.04 x86-64 : oosplash.bin does not quit, system
>> monitor says it is waiti
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 03:29:27PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> NetBSD libc exports almost nothing in comparison:
It's in /usr/lib/crt0.o, which is linked into all executables AFAIK.
> There must be something else, possibly a change in the compiler toolchain.
> Thomas, your last succesful buil
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 04:29:34PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >
> > Hmm; are we linking with crt0.o though ? :-) at least on Linux our C
> > library exports that symbol:
>
> > $ objdump -T /lib/libc.so.6 | grep environ
> >
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 04:29:34PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 17:13 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Does this ring a bell for anyone?
> ..
> > cp -f batch.bat ../../../unxbsdx3.pro/bin/batch.bat
> > Making:libosl_process.so
> > ../../../unxbsdx3.pro/slo/osl_process
Greetings to you,
How are you and your family?, It is my honor and with a heart deep of
humiliation seeking good consolation in writing to you,
I am Mr. Apichai Sornakat, from Thailand the Personal Assistant to Thaksin
Shinawatra which was ousted by a military coup on Sept 19 2006,and Marti
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Arnaud Versini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||37429
--- Comment #115 from Arnaud Vers
Hi all,
here is a proposal to improve our handling of patching and commits on
master.
LibreOffice is aiming for a welcoming and inviting culture to aloow
newcomer get invaolved fast. This is why we have a very lax requirement
on commits to master and are inviting people to post patches to the
dev
Hi,
this patch fixes two "unchecked return value"-warnings in svpclient
// Kenneth
diff --git a/vcl/workben/svpclient.cxx b/vcl/workben/svpclient.cxx
index e7e32d7..af56dc3 100644
--- a/vcl/workben/svpclient.cxx
+++ b/vcl/workben/svpclient.cxx
@@ -248,10 +248,15 @@ rtl::OString MyWin::processComm
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:27:47AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > The only operating systems for which it is possibly used are Linux and
> > NetBSD.
> > The NetBSD configuration is dated from Y2K and is missing too much
> > information
> > to be working.
> > I suspec
Francois Tigeot wrote:
> The only operating systems for which it is possibly used are Linux and NetBSD.
> The NetBSD configuration is dated from Y2K and is missing too much information
> to be working.
> I suspect nobody is using it on Linux either.
>
> Is there any reason to keep IA64 support in t
Hi all,
There are some definitions to support the IA64 architecture in set_soenv.inc
and in bootstrap/solenv/inc
The only operating systems for which it is possibly used are Linux and NetBSD.
The NetBSD configuration is dated from Y2K and is missing too much information
to be working.
I suspect n
Le 2011-05-20 09:44, Cedric Bosdonnat a écrit :
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:38 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 09:22 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
I was just on the usenet openoffice group and this bug was mentioned as
being a problem with people working on larger files. As this see
Le 2011-05-20 09:47, Michael Meeks a écrit :
Hi Marc,
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 09:22 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
I was just on the usenet openoffice group and this bug was mentioned as
being a problem with people working on larger files. As this seems to
have been fixed in the upcoming 3.4 version of
39 matches
Mail list logo
