Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the fifth beta release
of LibreOffice 3.4. The upcoming 3.4 will be the second major release
of the LibreOffice project, and comes with many exciting new
features. Please be aware that LibreOffice 3.4 Beta5 is not yet ready
for productio
> I'd like to commit the attached patch to the 3.4 branch. This was
> discovered by the unit test which failed when an empty matrix element
> didn't have a value of 0.0. As it turned out, I was initializing the
> higher 4 bytes via 32-bit pointer but the lower 4 bytes were left
> un-initialized,
This has now been pushed. (Commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id=746fff15ad34616635e09125f6d0656da39a05ad
)
But in general, this bug, and I guess similar ones Michael was investigating
recently, brings up a serious question: How broken might the cod
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36957, which changed state.
Bug 36957 Summary: EDITING: Insert TOC – Edit – Writer crashes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36957
What|Old Value |New Value
---
Cor Nouws wrote:
> * For the release notes:
> pls inform about parallel installation.
> Is there a page at the DOcument foundation wiki? Or only the older
> OOo one? If the latter, I can c&p to TDF wiki...
>
Hi Cor,
please do - release notes are going here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Rel
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 03:53 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote:
> Hello There,
>
> I'm posting here the git diff of the work I've done till now.
> @Kohei Since I do not want to disturb my master branch I'm here
> pasting the diff only. Please create a feature branch and apply it, so
> that I can clone that
I'd like to commit the attached patch to the 3.4 branch. This was
discovered by the unit test which failed when an empty matrix element
didn't have a value of 0.0. As it turned out, I was initializing the
higher 4 bytes via 32-bit pointer but the lower 4 bytes were left
un-initialized, which caus
Hello There,
I'm posting here the git diff of the work I've done till now.
@Kohei Since I do not want to disturb my master branch I'm here
pasting the diff only. Please create a feature branch and apply it, so
that I can clone that branch and commit on that.
diff --git a/sc/source/ui/app/inputwi
Please review the attached patch to suppress warning with MSVC
compiler. Thanks.
Kohei
0001-Let-s-not-change-the-signature-of-UNO-call-prefer-st.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #100 from Petr Mladek 2011-05-12 11:21:36 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #99)
> nominate data loss / corruption during odf presentation load & then save:
> bug#37131
It is a duplicate of the bug 37017 that is already here and has been
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 37015, which changed state.
Bug 37015 Summary: Scripting other than Basic unavailable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37015
What|Old Value |New Value
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 37017, which changed state.
Bug 37017 Summary: Bullets in presentation not saved
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37017
What|Old Value |New Value
-
Radek Doulík píše v Čt 12. 05. 2011 v 15:20 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> please review my patch for fdo#37017. It sets version info so that we
> don't hit workarounds for versions <= 3.4.x. I would like to put on 3-4
> branch.
It seems to be the right solution as discussed on irc => cherry-picked
into libreo
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 06:17 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> OK to apply to the branch?
Ok for me. Pushed.
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
___
LibreOff
Hi all,
Could anyone review and sign-off this patch in 3.4 branch? The change
from sal_True to sal_False was pretty complex to find out, but I just
reverted it to the value it had in 3.3 sources.
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integratio
Hi Peter,
On 2011-05-07 at 13:47 +0200, Peter Jentsch wrote:
> I commited a fix for fdo#35543 (FILEOPEN: hangs when trying to open
> SpreadsheetML). The fix is actually more of a workaround than a real
> fix, because it simply adds a timeout with the ability to retry or abort
> an ongoing load re
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to develop a small gui in an XToolPanel.
I've read and followed example about xToolPanel in c++ and convert it to
java code with success, now I've my green panel displayed.
What I'm doing now is to add some control inside (like button). I can
add controls but they are all
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Petr Mladek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36703
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Petr Mladek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36510
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
At the last marketing team confcall I offered to help coordinate
completing the release notes of the upcoming 3.4 version and then
distilling the information into a version more suitable for our website
accompanied with photos of some or many of these changes.
Could we, all, please take a clos
Hi,
please review my patch for fdo#37017. It sets version info so that we
don't hit workarounds for versions <= 3.4.x. I would like to put on 3-4
branch.
Cheers
Radek
commit ab328ba55be3b7249d1a55a939182ffd2034c3aa
Author: Radek Doulik
Date: Wed May 11 17:48:21 2011 +0200
change the vers
OK to apply to the branch?
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36679, which changed state.
Bug 36679 Summary: Virus detected on installation
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36679
What|Old Value |New Value
As of our discussion on IRC, this makes sense.
Signed off and cherry-picked
F
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 04:18 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Please review and cherry-pick to libreoffice-3-4. I have verified that it
> doesn't break the installer. The two files in question are not needed; we
> have
Signed off and cherry-picked
F.
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 20:46 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote:
> Hi Friends of LibreOffice,
>
> Can you please review and cherry-pick few of my fixes from master to 3-4?
>
> Fix Ligthproof extension integration
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/comm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36673, which changed state.
Bug 36673 Summary: FORMATTING: Date format in LibO 3.4 different from LibO 3.3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36673
What|Old Value |New Value
---
Please review and cherry-pick to libreoffice-3-4. I have verified that it
doesn't break the installer. The two files in question are not needed; we have
no idea in what situation they are supposed to be run by the user and/or
sysadmin. And rebasegui.exe (which just displays some information) doe
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36667, which changed state.
Bug 36667 Summary: Calculating in Text Documents: update broken
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36667
What|Old Value |New Value
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36915, which changed state.
Bug 36915 Summary: Beanshell scripts don't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36915
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Hi Noel,
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 10:40 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> please see updated patch
As told you on IRC, it's ok for me. I just signed it off and pushed it.
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
Pushed to master and cherry-picked with "-s" to libreoffice-3-4
F.
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 17:36 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Attached is a patch fixing the sw table formulas update in 3.4. Could
> someone review and sign it off? It's a partial revert from
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/lib
On 11/05/11 16:36, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hi all,
Attached is a patch fixing the sw table formulas update in 3.4. Could
someone review and sign it off? It's a partial revert from
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=2b9726405495529d64e7ab8537ea30119f607d1e
The test in the
Looks inoffensive.
Cherry-picked with signoff
F.
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 13:58 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> please see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37103
> and if someone could review and cherry-pick the patch
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #99 from Michael Meeks 2011-05-12
02:44:35 PDT ---
nominate data loss / corruption during odf presentation load & then save:
bug#37131
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are recei
please see updated patch
Noel
diff --git scripting/util/provider/beanshell/makefile.mk scripting/util/provider/beanshell/makefile.mk
index cbb0c40..1f70fcb 100755
--- scripting/util/provider/beanshell/makefile.mk
+++ scripting/util/provider/beanshell/makefile.mk
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ EXTENSIONNAME:
I asked about this on the OOo dev list, and here is an informative reply from
Michael Stahl:
> Carsten did something in OOo 3.3 to improve startup performance.
> my vague memory of what he found out:
>
> on NT6 (Vista or newer) the OS does aggressive caching and cold start is
> very fast.
> on N
I mentioned the wrong bug, the patch fixes the above
On 11/05/11 21:46, Noel Power wrote:
Hi,
Please have a find a fix for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35139 here
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=46611 I'd like to
apply that to libreoffice 3.4
thanks
Noel
_
Hi,
(what stands Stt for?)
If it means "start" (Nigel Hawkins suggested that) I'd suggest to rename
pSttNd to pStartNd and GetSttNode to GetStartNode to get better readable
code.
Last but not least, I should test my changes...but how? I came across
that piece of code using simian but I don
38 matches
Mail list logo
