Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Android Port

2011-05-05 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> I dont think we have to cross compile. We should try and integrate the > android NDK, which allows native c/c++ compilation, into what we have > already in LO. Cross-compilation is what one normally does when one uses the NDK. Do you know what cross-compilation means? The problem is that the

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|36439 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Android Port

2011-05-05 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I dont think we have to cross compile. We should try and integrate the android NDK, which allows native c/c++ compilation, into what we have already in LO. On 06/05/2011 02:27, rcsilv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Michael On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:16, Michael Meeks

[Libreoffice] Why define a string just to use a copy of the string a few lines later?

2011-05-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, Looking at this change (as it breaks with WaE because that function is unused on Mac) http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/diff/desktop/unx/source/start.c?id=1a790d00100183abfa71666d437af9115940c32a I realize that it's either too late/I'm too tired or I'm lacking some basic un

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Android Port

2011-05-05 Thread rcsilv...@gmail.com
Hello, Michael On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:16, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 22:05 -0300, rcsilv...@gmail.com wrote: > > Very nice, Michael! I think that, at this moment, a tablet (Honeycomb) > > interface is much more needed because it can be a full-featured > > versio

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] Report

2011-05-05 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Timo, Timo píše v Čt 05. 05. 2011 v 12:28 +0200: > this week I am very busy because of the university. I will work on next > week. Great to have you here with the report :-) [while of course sorry to hear that your school still keeps you busy ;-)] I noticed you tried to reach me today, but w

[Libreoffice] Empty functions in chart module

2011-05-05 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, By digging into cppcheck logs, I saw this : [chart2/source/model/template/BubbleChartType.cxx:69] Technically the member function 'StaticBubbleChartTypeDefaults_Initializer::lcl_AddDefaultsToMap' can be const [chart2/source/model/template/BubbleChartTypeTemplate.cxx:76]: Technically th

Re: [Libreoffice] Relaxed ccache acceptance for Mac

2011-05-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Thorsten, *, On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > FYI - it seems ccache has all the issues fixed in 3.1, that were > mentioned in http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104567, > so I bulk-accept versions greater or equal now. Yes, see also http://www.mail-archive

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...

2011-05-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > * announcing binfilter as deprecated in 3.4 >        + want to warn people in plenty of time >        + officially deprecate it, we drop save support in 3.4 >        + be warned - it will die in a new major release soon. Oh - and ple

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] new color picker dialog for all applications

2011-05-05 Thread Christian Lippka
This is a patch I have hacked on in my spare time. It replaces the old color picker with a new one. See here for a video demo http://youtu.be/rPu6EmIxkIM?hd=1 To see it in the running office you can for example go to menu tools->options->colors and press edit The dialog is implemented as a ser

Re: [Libreoffice] GSoC libreoffice android port

2011-05-05 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
(2011/04/26 0:30), Jonathan Aquilina wrote: I am aware that there is a task for the GSoC to port LO to android. I think we should have our own specific branch for android development as i am sure until we iron things out there will be lots of breakages that we should keep out of master. How i

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] Report

2011-05-05 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
(2011/05/05 17:28), Timo wrote: this week I am very busy because of the university. I will work on next week. I suggest a blog to note anything pops up in your mind; including a "report". No, you don't need a "report" if you are able to manage yourself :) -- Nguyen Vu Hung (Nguyye^~n Vu~ Hu+ng

[Libreoffice] [GSoc] Project progress.

2011-05-05 Thread Anurag Jain
Hello there, My project named "Implementing multi-line input bar in LO Calc" is aimed at making the editing in input bar of calc more easier by making it multi-line with word-wrap and scrolling feature. Long before the GSoC I've been under continuous contact and guidance by Kohei Yoshida, my mento

[Libreoffice] Fwd: First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Teeson
Sorry forgot to cc the list. Begin forwarded message: > From: Peter Teeson > Date: May 5, 2011 1:53:59 PM EDT > To: Thorsten Behrens > Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete > dependancies > > On 2011-05-05, at 11:47 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: >> Peter Tee

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Android Port

2011-05-05 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 22:05 -0300, rcsilv...@gmail.com wrote: > Very nice, Michael! I think that, at this moment, a tablet (Honeycomb) > interface is much more needed because it can be a full-featured > version in a market that isn't dominated by MS Office. Additionally, > we already hav

[Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...

2011-05-05 Thread Michael Meeks
Present: + Michael, Norbert, Kendy, Andras, Bjoern, Thorsten, Petr, Fridrich, Cedric, Kohei, Rene, Mitch * AA done: + encourage(d) QA guys to quietly dig at snapshots + master now parallel installable (thanks Andras) + to get a release buil

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

2011-05-05 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks wrote (28-04-11 18:05) Reading this again I missed a few obvious pieces: Thanks for your comments, and sorry for the delay on my side. * Here is a 2nd draft: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Use_of_MailList pretty ready for use, IMHO ;-) * Linked

[Libreoffice] [Patch] make the OOXML import filter use sheet local db data

2011-05-05 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello, I hope that this is the last patch regarding the new sheet local db data. This patch allows the OOXML import use the sheet local db data. This patch needs my previous patch for the Vba autofilter. If anyone knows another place where autofilter or unnamed db data is used, please write me a

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Use sheet local db data in ScVbaRange::Autofilter

2011-05-05 Thread Markus Mohrhard
I forgot to add one file to git, so here is the correct patch. Only difference is that in docuno.cxx 3 lines are added. Rest is the same as in the old version. 2011/5/5 Markus Mohrhard > Hello, > > here is a patch that allows the new sheet local db data being used by vba. > This patch fixes som

Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-05 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Peter Teeson wrote: > (0) In fact I have the Build instructions handy as I printed them out for > easy reference. > It's not clear to me from them as to which directory one should be in > to issue them. > > Is it correct to assume git/libo? > Yes > (1) "please re-run build inside e

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread plino
> If you mean the --enable-release-build switch, that has been introduced to > the master branch only. > This means that it won't be available in the Windows nightlies either (unless there are plans to build master nightlies, currently there is only an empty 3.4 folder) > Please note that we ha

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> The advantage is that if you would tag Beta5 for release TODAY it would > already include the switch that prevents is from overwriting the stable > build since that has already been committed. If you mean the --enable-release-build switch, that has been introduced to the master branch only. Pl

[Libreoffice] Relaxed ccache acceptance for Mac (was: [Libreoffice-commits] .: Branch 'libreoffice-3-4' - configure.in

2011-05-05 Thread Thorsten Behrens
FYI - it seems ccache has all the issues fixed in 3.1, that were mentioned in http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104567, so I bulk-accept versions greater or equal now. - Forwarded message from Thorsten Behrens - Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 07:49:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Thorsten Beh

Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Teeson
Thanks for your patience and help Thorsten See below. respect Peter On 2011-05-05, at 5:46 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Peter Teeson wrote: >> --- my comments & questions - >> (0) The symbolic links are correct >> (1) What does it mean to " please re-run bui

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread Andras Timar
2011/5/5 plino : > The advantage is that if you would tag Beta5 for release TODAY it would > already include the switch that prevents is from overwriting the stable > build since that has already been committed. It was committed to master not the libreoffice-3-4 (beta) branch. It will work for the

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread plino
> > > Am I wrong to assume that a current nightly build from the 3.4 branch > > is a better option for Beta testing (since the dev build fix was > > committed) than the official Beta4? > > Right - that should be so. > > > Why not skip Beta4 and release Beta5? It's not unusual in software >

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:27 -0700, plino wrote: > I guess my understanding of the tree analogy wasn't correct. So the > trunk is the main code which comes from version 0.0 and will keep > growing and from which a new branch (3.5) will soon "sprout" Sure - although we don't branch early si

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Use sheet local db data in ScVbaRange::Autofilter

2011-05-05 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello, here is a patch that allows the new sheet local db data being used by vba. This patch fixes some problems with XDatabaseRange in combination with the sheet local db data. I tested this with a test document I got from Noel and all seven test succeeded. The patch needs the last two patches

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] WMF import in RTF fixes

2011-05-05 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 09:51 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Could someone review them and cherry-pick them in -3-4 branch? I tried; there was a slew of minor differences though - which seems odd to me; why should master have diverged much from libreoffice-3-4 ? So - we still nee

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36863, which changed state. Bug 36863 Summary: [Math] Crash updating formula https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36863 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Libreoffice] Seek behaviour crasher ...

2011-05-05 Thread Michael Meeks
Just pushed this to libreoffice-3-4 It seems that 'Seek' does an implicit bounds check, returning a NULL for OOB that we need to replicate when doing this conversion :-) HTH, Michael. >From 128477a3cba4a8985432ed342ee2d3c654e1e119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Thorsten, *, Thorsten Behrens schrieb: > Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: >> This was only a matter of poking. No chance to do so for >> people who cared. > Hi Friedrich, > while I agree in general, I don't think it provides much value to > further gripe about the missing parallel installability

Re: [Libreoffice] build breaks on i686

2011-05-05 Thread Andreas Radke
Any idea? This is still broken here in 3.4beta3. -Andy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [GSoC] Report

2011-05-05 Thread Timo
Hi, this week I am very busy because of the university. I will work on next week. Regards, Timo ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread plino
Thank you all for the answers. I guess my understanding of the tree analogy wasn't correct. So the trunk is the main code which comes from version 0.0 and will keep growing and from which a new branch (3.5) will soon "sprout" (or is this a sub-branch from a 3.0 branch?) Within the 3.4 branch a ne

Re: [Libreoffice] broffice removal patch ...

2011-05-05 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> While we are at it, can we possibly restore the LibreOffice artwork in > the Windows MSI installer? Hmm, which artwork in particular, and when was it last seen there then? --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://l

Re: [Libreoffice] broffice removal patch ...

2011-05-05 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, While we are at it, can we possibly restore the LibreOffice artwork in the Windows MSI installer? Andras ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36262, which changed state. Bug 36262 Summary: Undo BrOffice, return to LibreOffice https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36262 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Libreoffice] broffice removal patch ...

2011-05-05 Thread Michael Meeks
>From c668119c3303a9ef6f09dfc5a74f5314aecd188d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Meeks Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:01:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] bug 36262 - undo BrOffice branding work --- unotools/source/config/configmgr.cxx | 17 - unotools/source/config/makefile.mk |4

Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-05 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Peter Teeson wrote: > --- my comments & questions - > (0) The symbolic links are correct > (1) What does it mean to " please re-run build inside each one to > isolate the problem." > See http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build#Partial_build > NOTE

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread Petr Mladek
Christian Lohmaier píše v St 04. 05. 2011 v 10:34 +0200: > Hi *, > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > [...] > >> Will Beta4 overwrite my stable 3.3.2? > > > > 3.4(.0) beta 4 will, yes. > > Well, that is still to be questioned - as there are other packaging > bugs that hav

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 01:13 -0700, plino wrote: > When you do a code freeze for a Beta (or any) release it means that a branch > is created and to that branch only fixes are added but not new features, > correct? Good question - that branch is libreoffice-3-4 and you have it abo

Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Teeson
Update on how this worked. On 2011-05-04, at 6:58 PM, Peter Teeson wrote: > Hi Michael et al: > Tried everything suggested so far. Same build failure. > Peter > > P.S. Right now going to watch the evening news whilst doing: > > Gandalf:git pteeson$ rm -dfR libo > Gandalf:git pteeson$ git clone

[Libreoffice] [GSoc] Community bounding period

2011-05-05 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi all, This email is more targetted at the GSoc students and mentors, but anyone could read interesting news here. Until may, 23rd we are in a community bounding period for the students. In order to get them better integrated, I'ld like each of them to start having a look at the code area where

Re: [Libreoffice] Create a "dynamic" dropdown menu with uno and python

2011-05-05 Thread Noel Power
Hi Günter On 30/04/11 12:56, Günter Heinendirk wrote: And here my "real" problems started: I want to have a dropdown element in the toolbar, which allows to choose between the available custom slide shows. Since I didn't know, which custom slide shows are existing, I need to fill the dropdown

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Plino, plino píše v Čt 05. 05. 2011 v 01:13 -0700: > When you do a code freeze for a Beta (or any) release it means that a branch > is created and to that branch only fixes are added but not new features, > correct? Yes, no features to the release branch. The only exception is when a feature

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread Thorsten Behrens
plino wrote: > When you do a code freeze for a Beta (or any) release it means that a branch > is created and to that branch only fixes are added but not new features, > correct? > > Are the fixes to the Beta branch incorporated to the main code (trunk?)? > I.e. the "trunk" contains all the fixes f

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-05 Thread plino
When you do a code freeze for a Beta (or any) release it means that a branch is created and to that branch only fixes are added but not new features, correct? Are the fixes to the Beta branch incorporated to the main code (trunk?)? I.e. the "trunk" contains all the fixes from the Beta branch plus

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] WMF import in RTF fixes

2011-05-05 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi all, I have recently pushed some patches from the build repo fixing some WMF import fixes in RTF files. Could someone review them and cherry-pick them in -3-4 branch? The commits: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=ac9fbf25dad680195005524902daeb5d48dc6c28 http://cgit.f

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 vitriol changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36863 --- Comment #65 from vitriol 2011-05-05