Re: [Libreoffice] -conver-to on master

2011-04-16 Thread Muthu Subramanian K
Hi Miklos, hmm...no idea on this one...I haven't touched the code in a long time now... you would want to diff the desktop module and see? Thanks! Muthu Subramanian On 04/15/2011 04:07 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi, > > On -3-3, the following works fine: > > libreoffice -nologo -convert-to rtf

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-16 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi, Before i forget... If you think this is not a so bad idea, just let me know. Would be a pleasure to prepare the files for you. :-) I need just a map with the new names and a file name (#include "changingName.hpp"). Best regards, Júlio. ___ LibreOff

Re: [Libreoffice] [Partly pushed] Easy Hack completed - All bogus comments removed

2011-04-16 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Cédric, I think it's done. :-) The big one is in bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36234 All bogus comments removed keeping the indentation, the bug id and the remainder comment in the same line of the pattern. The next patch will remove the trash in that replacement, e.g.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] How to create get an XWorksheet from a XSpreadsheet?

2011-04-16 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello Noel, I have found the reason why setUpDocumentModules won't work correctly with the new method. It seems that the method will only work when the name and the code name of a ScTable are the same. I have worked with a document where this is not the case and then XNamedAccess->getByName(String

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cross-references to numbered paragraphs: remove trailing dots at the end of a cross-reference, or where they precede an open parenthesis that starts the next paragraph level

2011-04-16 Thread Troy Rollo
On Thursday 14 April 2011, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > This is quite restrictive as it only clears the ending '.' I think that > the same should apply whatever the suffix is.. Would one want to have > [1-] as the reference? If it were 20 years ago and I was designing on a clear slate, I agree it wou

Re: [Libreoffice] libreoffice-build 3.3.99.1 not on the mirrors

2011-04-16 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:49:09PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: > any reason why it is still missing? all other sources seem to be there. See the last sentence of http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/9273 pgpD19wg2Dptn.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation failed in lotuswordpro

2011-04-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:59:49 +0200 Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hmmm, unfortunately not. It would be kinda hard to derive such info > from the source automagically. Thus: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?id=04c9261f16c3a80f0e9ce4e701783a17c3c6e010 *cough* *cough* -- bet

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation failed in lotuswordpro

2011-04-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:10:38 +0100 Caolán McNamara wrote: > Hmm, and how about making sure the test won't be run before the > Library_lwpft target itself is built, given that the test doesn't > actually link against it, but does a createInstance on it. Is that > implied in there somewhere. Hmmm,

[Libreoffice] [Patches] Fix build with --enable-werror under CLang++

2011-04-16 Thread Julien Chaffraix
Hi, attached are 2 trivial patches to make the 'tools' directory build with --enable-werror under CLang++. One of the change is actually an existing off-by-one error caught by the compiler. Those 2 patches are released under the LGPLv3+/MPL. Thanks, Julien From ee8fe9239d607cb9e02d1e468d8232b84f

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-design] About the Navigator

2011-04-16 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Ricardo, all! Ricardo, thanks for summarizing the proposals. Some of them have real EasyHack quality, I think. I added some behavioral description to 36308 (the first one). Since I don't know better (as well), I also forward your mail to the developer list. Maybe they can suggest how to handle

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation failed in lotuswordpro

2011-04-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 22:39 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > This is because the header target depends on everything we need > to compile the objects: which is our own headers and the headers of all > libs we link against. uh huh, got clobbered there because I assumed it was only a check on heade

Re: [Libreoffice] CTL settings for Hebrew (ctl_he.xcd)

2011-04-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 10:56 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > Following your hint, here's the patch to fix #i61863. It disables > squence checking for CTL languages and enables it for Thai. So, here's what I suggest. As rene points out, this doesn't build, so... lets split those default into the ctl

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation failed in lotuswordpro

2011-04-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 20:16:07 +0100 Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 20:58 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > There's a secondary issue (afaict) wrt parallel building, isn't > there ? > > i.e. gb_Module_add_check_targets of "Package_qa_cppunit" and > "CppunitTest_lotuswordpro", i.e.

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] letter wizard template files packed and installed in two copies fdo#35722

2011-04-16 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, Windows installer size could be further reduced, if letter wizard template files would not be packed in two copies for 26 languages. First copies are installed to: c:\Program Files\LibreOffice 3\Basis\share\template\wizard\letter\\ Second (identical) copies are installed to: c:\Program Files\

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation failed in lotuswordpro

2011-04-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 20:58 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:30:52 +0100 > Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > We're in transition from one build system to the other, and its still > > unclear to me in the new one how to set one target as a dependency of > > the other :-). I know

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation failed in lotuswordpro

2011-04-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:30:52 +0100 Caolán McNamara wrote: > We're in transition from one build system to the other, and its still > unclear to me in the new one how to set one target as a dependency of > the other :-). I know in Module_lotuswordpro.mk I want the target > inside CppunitTest_foo th

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Zack changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36271 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedes

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #23 from Zack 2011-04-16 09:34:06 PDT --- Nominate: Bug 36271 Writer won't open for people on Windows. Blocker bugs don't get more severe than this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation failed in lotuswordpro

2011-04-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 01:37 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote: > terminate called after throwing an instance of > 'com::sun::star::registry::InvalidRegistryException' > Aborted > make: *** > [/home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/solver/300/unxlngi6/workdir/CppunitTest/lotuswordpro_test_lotuswordpro.te

Re: [Libreoffice] Easyhack : updating biblio.odb

2011-04-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 00:09 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > I updated biblio.odb, commited and pushed it. There are less references > than before but I didn't want to put books published before 2008. Looks good to me. > If you're ok with biblio.odb, i can put this easy task as complete

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#31251 - Improve default page layout

2011-04-16 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Sébastien! Thanks for the ultra-fast reply :-) Am Samstag, den 16.04.2011, 15:01 +0200 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: > Le Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:58:46 +0200, [...] > > @ Sébastien: Would it be possible that you'll have a look how it is > > implemented. Any chance that we - as Thomas mentioned - get

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#31251 - Improve default page layout

2011-04-16 Thread Sébastien Le Ray
Le Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:58:46 +0200, Christoph Noack a écrit : > Hi Sébastien, Thomas, all! > > Am Samstag, den 16.04.2011, 14:41 +0200 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: > > Le Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:31:58 +, > > Thomas Arnhold a écrit : > > > I like your patches for the new smooth shadow. > > > > >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#31251 - Improve default page layout

2011-04-16 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Sébastien, Thomas, all! Am Samstag, den 16.04.2011, 14:41 +0200 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: > Le Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:31:58 +, > Thomas Arnhold a écrit : > > I like your patches for the new smooth shadow. > > > > I looked around the other LibO apps like Impress or Draw. They have > > this s

[Libreoffice] gbuild: use gb_CHECKOBJECTOWNER to check for double linked objects

2011-04-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, you can now run: make -sr gb_CHECKOBJECTOWNER=T in a module or in the source root (add "-f GNUmakefile.mk" in source root). It will then check for objects that are linked in multiple libraries, which is: a) not really supported in gbuild and likely does not what you intend b) should b

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#31251 - Improve default page layout

2011-04-16 Thread Sébastien Le Ray
Le Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:31:58 +, Thomas Arnhold a écrit : > Hi, > > I like your patches for the new smooth shadow. > > I looked around the other LibO apps like Impress or Draw. They have > this shadow already, but it's not as width as in Writer and it's on > all sides. Maybe we should do it

[Libreoffice] gbuild: final extension support

2011-04-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, gbuild now supports "final extensions": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?id=27ab0500f47500e401cde105acc8752f7c06bcb2 So you now the three possiblities to inject code in gbuild: - files named solenv/gbuild/extensions/pre_*.mk parsed before all - files names sole

Re: [Libreoffice] Move DBG_ERROR[1-9] to OSL_TRACE

2011-04-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, hadn't time in the last weeks to fix this. I will do this in the next days/weeks. Thomas On 03/21/2011 08:07 AM, David Tardon wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:53:36PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: >> Hi, >> >> some days ago I converted all DBG_ERROR[1-9], which had a printf like >> format

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#31251 - Improve default page layout

2011-04-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I like your patches for the new smooth shadow. I looked around the other LibO apps like Impress or Draw. They have this shadow already, but it's not as width as in Writer and it's on all sides. Maybe we should do it in Writer as in Draw and Impress. Looks better I think. Here is what I mean:

[Libreoffice] libreoffice-build 3.3.99.1 not on the mirrors

2011-04-16 Thread Andreas Radke
any reason why it is still missing? all other sources seem to be there. -Andy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove OS2 Support in libs-core, libs-gui and ure

2011-04-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
The patches are too big to post here, I've put them on a web server. These ones only remove os2/ subdirectories: http://dl.wolfpond.org/0001-Remove-OS-2-specific-subdirectories.libs-core.patch http://dl.wolfpond.org/0001-Remove-OS-2-specific-subdirectories.libs-gui.patch This one removes any refe

Re: [Libreoffice] Easyhack : updating biblio.odb

2011-04-16 Thread Julien Nabet
I just forgot to mention there was too a Portuguese reference. Julien. Le 16/04/2011 00:09, Julien Nabet a écrit : Hello, I updated biblio.odb, commited and pushed it. There are less references than before but I didn't want to put books published before 2008. 3 years in computers art, it's qu

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36263 --- Comment #22 from Rainer Bie