Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] gitattributes .po filter performance problem

2011-04-11 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:29:13PM +0200, Andras Timar wrote: > Hi, > > Some of us experienced performance problems with the gitattributes > filter defined for .po files. The 'clean' filter were not only run on > commit, but also during clone/pull. This was not intended at all. > Miklos asked ab

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] conditional formatting with an unlimited number of rules

2011-04-11 Thread Robert Dargaud
Hello Christoph, Le 11/04/11 23:42, Christoph Noack a écrit : [...] Hehe ... then we should talk. To be honest, please tell me if you want to give this another try - or if you want to have a look at another topic as well. Yes, I want continue on this subject because it seems to me that it's a

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoc] Time to start ranking the applications

2011-04-11 Thread Rahul Ramesh
Thanks Kohei Yoshida, My purpose of applying to GSOC was to learn and start contributing to FOSS. Eventhough I'm good in programming, I haven't worked with other FOSS projects. I come from a place where it's difficult to find help regarding these areas, so the concept of mentors was really appeali

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] conditional formatting with an unlimited number of rules

2011-04-11 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi all! Am Montag, den 11.04.2011, 01:09 +0200 schrieb Robert Dargaud: > Hi Katarina & Christoph (& All), > > I have improved code like you suggest. Cool, thanks! :-) [...] > > And - of course - I also have some ideas how to really improve the > > dialog and bring it to the "2010s" :-) But thi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove VolumeInfoMask_XXX in favour of osl_VolumeInfo_Mask_XXX

2011-04-11 Thread Michaël Lefèvre
Actually, this was part of the easy hack  "hunt and destroy obsolete macros". As I have very little time (2h/week) to join the fun, and taking some vacation for a month, I didn't "apply" to this on the wiki. To any one, fill free to complete the task. After vcl enum, Christina ;) you' re in ? Re

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove VolumeInfoMask_XXX in favour of osl_VolumeInfo_Mask_XXX

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Lefevre
--- framework/source/services/autorecovery.cxx |4 ++-- ucb/source/ucp/file/filglob.cxx|2 +- ucb/source/ucp/file/shell.cxx |4 ++-- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/framework/source/services/autorecovery.cxx b/framework/source/se

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove VolumeInfoMask_XXX in favour of osl_VolumeInfo_Mask_XXX

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Lefevre
--- sal/inc/osl/file.hxx |9 sal/qa/osl/file/osl_File.cxx | 108 +- sal/workben/testfile.cxx |2 +- 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) diff --git a/sal/inc/osl/file.hxx b/sal/inc/osl/file.hxx index d72dfc4..5ba8177

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoc] Time to start ranking the applications

2011-04-11 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hey guys, On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 14:41 -0400, Maxime Côté wrote: > Hi all, > > > I'm kinda in the same position as Rahul. I have send my proposal for > the port to Android but, as we are nearly at the end of the semester > I'm trying to find time to complete an easy hack for my propsal > between

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoc] Time to start ranking the applications

2011-04-11 Thread Maxime Côté
Hi all, I'm kinda in the same position as Rahul. I have send my proposal for the port to Android but, as we are nearly at the end of the semester I'm trying to find time to complete an easy hack for my propsal between my multiple homeworks and exams. Now when is the limit to submit the easy hack,

[Libreoffice] What do you want in this big list?

2011-04-11 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi friends, I'm finishing the second Easy Hack of removing not useful comments, precisely, the comments in the following format: // --> OD 2008-01-08 #newlistlevelattrs# I think this grep has the last survivors: :-) http://pastebin.com/1XJzCZ8N Could i remove them automatically or is better to

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] gitattributes .po filter performance problem

2011-04-11 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, Some of us experienced performance problems with the gitattributes filter defined for .po files. The 'clean' filter were not only run on commit, but also during clone/pull. This was not intended at all. Miklos asked about it on git mailing list, if it was a bug in git. See all details in this

[Libreoffice] Compilation failed in external; Ubuntu 11.04 beta

2011-04-11 Thread Bálint Dózsa
Hi, I need some help. I've got this problem: *build -- version: 275224* * * * * *=* *Building module external* *=* *Entering /media/sda9/git/libox/external/glibc* * * *mkout -- version: 1.8* *Nothing to do here.* *Entering /media/sda9/git/libox/external/gcc3_specific* * *

[Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.1 tag created (3.4.0-beta1)

2011-04-11 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, I have just created the libreoffice-3.3.99.1 tag for 3.4.0-beta1 release. The corresponding official builds will be available by the end of the week. You might switch your current 3-4 source tree to it using: ./g fetch --tags ./g checkout -b tag-libreoffice-3.3.99.1 libreoffice-3.3.99.1 Not

[Libreoffice] python - msgbox fragment ...

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Timo, On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 02:22 +0200, Timo wrote: > Is there a way to test the pythonfile within office? At the moment each > time i kill soffice, restart writer and click So - after a bit more digging; I got to here: class MessageBox: def __init__(self, XParentWindow):

[Libreoffice] Fw: [unhosted] volunteer C/C++ hackers needed for Unhosted LibreOffice cloud-sync

2011-04-11 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hi, I took the liberty of forwarding this message to this list, in case anyone's interested :-) Best, Charles. - Message Transféré - Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:56:02 +0200 De: Michiel de Jong À: unhosted Sujet: [unhosted] volunteer C/C++ hackers needed for Unhosted LibreOffice cloud-s

Re: [Libreoffice] GSoC: Easy Hack: Make python / mail-merge debuggable

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 02:22 +0200, Timo wrote: > Is there a way to test the pythonfile within office ? So ... I notice you did in fact attach your implementation: which is great. I was a tad worried about: rect = uno.createUnoStruct('com.sun.star.awt.Rectangle') stype, bu

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove usage of DECLARE_LIST in libs-core/idl

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Rafael Dominguez wrote: > This is the last patch removing the DECLARE_LIST, besides the > pending joseph DDE one patch, the binfilters and the one inside > tools/ref.hxx but this need porting of those macros first or a > work around. > Hi Rafael, sorry for letting this rot - I applied your later p

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Translate German comments.

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Bookkeeping. -- Thorsten pgpSitna7zHXe.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] GSoC: Easy Hack: Make python / mail-merge debuggable

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Timo, First - I'm sorry that your 'easy hack' turned out not to be that easy :-) [ that sucks ], possibly it is worth doing a hyper-easy one instead first, you know - finding some pointless comments or whatever. On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:58 +0200, Timo wrote: > I´ve been working on a un

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Removed never defined _OLD_FILE_IMPL

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Noel Power wrote: > >As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls > >to functions in order to see if they return a valid result. I'm > >quite sure that you already know whether it has side effects or > >not... I vote for "it hasn't", but I'm absolutely not sure > nah, just seems

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove unused macro DECL_DEST_LIST

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
This looks pushed, adding tag to thread. -- Thorsten pgpFQDheG18Ud.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Removed never defined _ENABLE_CUR_DIR

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
-- Thorsten pgp7BoGhoc12A.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST( SvTokenList, SvToken * )

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Rafael, patches look good, pushed of course & thanks a lot for your effort - and sorry for the lag, seems this one was overlooked. :) Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpS4iSsz5Z7d.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.f

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST( SvSlotElementList, SvSlotElement* )

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Noel Power wrote: > Mostly pushed as is, > Adding [PUSHED] then to this thread. -- Thorsten pgpmXWgsNvRT8.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] replace Saxon/J XSLT extension functions with libxslt/c++ equivalent

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Jan Holesovsky wrote: > How wrong I was ;-) - the best is expose the Inflater / Deflater classes > as you did, so I pushed your stuff as it was. > Adding [PUSHED] tag then to this thread. :) -- Thorsten pgpsnrqtryqkV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [REVIEW] Easy hack: expunge duplicate enumerations in vcl

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
serv serva wrote: > Sorry, i can't push it before tonight (about 7 hours) because of my job, the > notebook is at home. Could you please do it ? > i don't care about the author of commit, what matters is that the patch be > pushed. Anyway, it's a very simple patch. > Seems this was fixed indepen

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] conditional formatting with an unlimited number of rules

2011-04-11 Thread Robert Dargaud
I confirm : this patch is under LGPLv3+/MPL dual license Bob Le 11/04/11 10:57, Katarina Machalkova a écrit : On Monday, April 11, 2011 01:09:00 Robert Dargaud wrote: Hi Katarina& Christoph (& All), I have improved code like you suggest. Lovely :) Before I push the improved code to git r

Re: [Libreoffice] code cleanup in embeddedobj

2011-04-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Christina Roßmanith wrote: > // the following code is commented out since for now there > is still no completely correct way to detect > // whether the office can be terminated, so it is better to > have unnecessary process running than > // to loose any data > My take - re

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoc] Time to start ranking the applications

2011-04-11 Thread Rahul Ramesh
Hi, I'm a student applied for GSOC 2011. I've submitted proposal for "Improve writer HTML Export". I want to try out my hand on the 'Easy Hacks' but as you know it's the last month of the semester and we are having the University Exams. So it's difficult to find time in between the exams to work o

[Libreoffice] [GSoc] Time to start ranking the applications

2011-04-11 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi mentors, Students applications are now over and we need to have them sorted by April 20th (applications deduplication starts at that time). I had a first cycle through the applications to ignore the really hopeless ones and assign mentors where I could. I'll need you to: * Evaluate the applic

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for libs-gui repo

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Julio, On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 09:18 -0300, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: > I'm not experient with Git. I will be careful next time. Sorry, really > sorry. :-( Don't be sorry ! :-) it was not your problem, you were part of the solution. All the best, Michael. -- mic

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch for writer repo

2011-04-11 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Michael, Do you prefer global commits? Just ./g commit -a? I'll send a new email for you before next commit. ;-) Regards, Júlio. 2011/4/11 Michael Meeks > > On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 22:45 -0300, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: > > Comments in the following format not exists anymore in writer source >

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for libs-gui repo

2011-04-11 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Julien, sorry, I'm not experient with Git. I will be careful next time. Sorry, really sorry. :-( Regards, Júlio. 2011/4/11 Michael Meeks > > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:32 +0200, =?UTF-8?Q? Chr._Ro=C3=9Fmanith ?= > wrote: > > Julien Nabet fixed this already. I think he'll push it soon. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice QA process outline - a coarse draft.

2011-04-11 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Yifan, On 11/04/2011 13:59, Yifan Jiang wrote: Hi all, The following is some outline/brainstorm level of stuff to genereate a QA process documentation. I think it is necessary to have you all to review this to avoid overlapped work, misunderstanding and mistakes. And I also le

[Libreoffice] Master successfully built on Windows a moment ago

2011-04-11 Thread Tor Lillqvist
In case somebody wants to attempt to reproduce it, here is the state of the repo clones where this happened for me: = main repo = c5c603e643363c617ff82dad7865abb6c40c95a1 make relocate cope with more corner cases: no solver & fixed links = artwork = 41dad7336864284a2be4718954ab6d

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion: Let's change "solver//" to just "staging"

2011-04-11 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Tor, On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 04:53:59 -0600 "Tor Lillqvist" wrote: > Surely nobody in LibreOffice is using the same build tree for several > "master workspaces" (isn't that OOo concept is what the number> corresponds to?) and architectures, thus there is no need to > number> have these two direc

[Libreoffice] Suggestion: Let's change "solver//" to just "staging"

2011-04-11 Thread Tor Lillqvist
I suggest that we in master get rid of the two subdirectory levels under "solver" (or, as those who have worked in Hamburg tend to say, "*the* solver") and rename the "solver" directory to something meaningful. Surely nobody in LibreOffice is using the same build tree for several "master worksp

[Libreoffice] Libreoffice QA process outline - a coarse draft.

2011-04-11 Thread Yifan Jiang
Hi all, The following is some outline/brainstorm level of stuff to genereate a QA process documentation. I think it is necessary to have you all to review this to avoid overlapped work, misunderstanding and mistakes. And I also left a bunch of questions and blanks to be filled inside i

Re: [Libreoffice] release plan : inconsistency between 3.3.3 and 3.4

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Jean, On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 18:54 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > It's me or there is some inconsistency between the planned release dates > given by http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan for 3.3.3 > (2011-05-24) and 3.4 (2011-05-02) ? Sure - they happen on different dates

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Remove M1310 and M1400

2011-04-11 Thread Fridrich Strba
The topic says it all F. On 09/04/11 09:35, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 09:02:35AM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: There are also M1310 and M1400 checks, but M1310 and M1400 are not defined anywhere and can be safely removed. The attached patch removes all occurences of M131

Re: [Libreoffice] Excel 2003 XML format

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Peter, On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 00:11 +0200, Peter Jentsch wrote: > Erm, actually, no . I heard it's less than perfect especially > when your workflow involves several roundtrips between LibO and that > other office suite Oh - completely :-) I'm not disagreeing, just trying to find s

Re: [Libreoffice] Reg GSOC 2011 Proposal

2011-04-11 Thread Jesús Corrius
> Hi, > > I have submitted a proposal as part of the GSOC 2011. How should i get in > touch with the mentors or person in charge. In the ideas page there's contact information: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas Make sure to read also read this document: http://wiki.docum

Re: [Libreoffice] Libo 3.4 SrollBar bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Robert, On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 01:34 +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote: > I don't know if it's the good list for this : Not really for reporting bugs :-) > on 3.4 build, I've a strange display bug on dialog boxes ScrollBar. But finding bugs is good - particularly if we have patches

[Libreoffice] Reg GSOC 2011 Proposal

2011-04-11 Thread Rahul Ramesh
Hi, I have submitted a proposal as part of the GSOC 2011. How should i get in touch with the mentors or person in charge. Regards, Rahul ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreof

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen.sh pb with junit

2011-04-11 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > I'm attaching a patch that tries to implement this. > > I've tested with our (Frugalware) junit jar where the classpath is in > manifest and also with upstream junit jar, which bundles hamcrest. > > OK to push to libreoffice-3-4?

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch for writer repo

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 22:45 -0300, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: > Comments in the following format not exists anymore in writer source > code: :-) Pushed; thanks for all of that. Incidentally, it'd be great to have several patches in a single mail - it makes them easier to review, appl

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch for filters repo

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 22:52 -0300, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: > Comments in the following format not exists anymore in filters source > code: :-) Thanks Julio - pushed #2 ... :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch for libs-core repo

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 23:02 -0300, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: > Comments in the following format not exists anymore in libs-core > source code: :-) Thanks Julio - pushed :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _

Re: [Libreoffice] Sun compiler

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:03 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > AFAIK, there's no real reason left not to remove support for the old Sun > compiler. Agreed :-) glad we're on the same page; if we finally find a Solaris porter, the git history will no doubt be useful enough. ATB,

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Easy hack: expunge duplicate enumerations in vcl

2011-04-11 Thread serv serva
Hello, Sorry, i can't push it before tonight (about 7 hours) because of my job, the notebook is at home. Could you please do it ? i don't care about the author of commit, what matters is that the patch be pushed. Anyway, it's a very simple patch. Sorry again. Julien. --- En date de : Lun 11.4

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for libs-gui repo

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:32 +0200, =?UTF-8?Q? Chr._Ro=C3=9Fmanith ?= wrote: > Julien Nabet fixed this already. I think he'll push it soon. If the build is broken; we must push a fix ASAP, whomever wrote it. It is easy to commit Julien's patch for him - just commit with --author= and push

Re: [Libreoffice] Sun compiler

2011-04-11 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:16:28PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:31 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > Could a Solaris user confirm whether C52 is indeed completely obsolete > > or not in the year 2011 ? > > I would just ignore it :-) when the Illumos (the only Sol

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] conditional formatting with an unlimited number of rules

2011-04-11 Thread Katarina Machalkova
On Monday, April 11, 2011 01:09:00 Robert Dargaud wrote: > Hi Katarina & Christoph (& All), > > I have improved code like you suggest. > Lovely :) Before I push the improved code to git repo, can you please confirm that you're submitting this patch under LGPLv3+/MPL dual license? Thanks B. ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch]Add method Copy to ScVbaWorksheets

2011-04-11 Thread Noel Power
Hi Markus On 09/04/11 01:37, Markus Mohrhard wrote: Hello Noel, starting with a workbook with the following sheets 'sheet1', 'sheet2' and 'sheet3' and trying a macro like: sub test worksheets.copy after:=worksheets(2) end sub results in the following sheets in t

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for libs-gui repo

2011-04-11 Thread Chr. Roßmanith
Hi Julio,Julien Nabet fixed this already. I think he'll push it soon.ChristinaVon: "Júlio Hoffimann" Gesendet: 11.04.2011 03:31:41An: LibreOffice Betreff: [Libreoffice] Patch for libs-gui repoHi, This patch fix some literals in padmin module. Available under LGPLv3+/MPL. Regards,Júlio.  Schon gehör

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Easy hack: expunge duplicate enumerations in vcl

2011-04-11 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi Julien, I forgot to search in the whole code tree. Could you please push your additional changes? Thank you, Christina Am 10.04.2011 22:55, schrieb Julien Nabet: Hello Christina, Compilation failed in padmin (even after a make -r clean && make -sr). So here is a simple patch to validate