Re: [Libreoffice] GSOC 2011 - Android project - pointers ...

Hi Korrawit, On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 12:53 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > >Personally (what with time-to-market etc.) I think we should target > > the > > latest android API version - ie. API level 9 - which gives us a lot of > > nice (pre-wrapped) C APIs for talking to the system. >

Re: [Libreoffice] l10n based on PO files

Hi Petr, 2011/3/24 Petr Mladek : > > BTW: I see two type of errors when building the translations module: > > --- cut --- > No module named lxml > --- cut --- > > Do you see it as well? Could it cause any problems? > I don't see it, because I have lxml (http://lxml.de/). No problem, if you don't

Re: [Libreoffice] NLPsolver broken in master ?

Hi Jean, On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 06:03 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > does anybody have tried recently to compile the master with NLPsolver > extension enabled ? Ah - this is a good point ;-) I suspect there are a number of submerged compile / latent merge issues that we're not picking

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Adding and Removing Color Charts

Hi Rob, On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 21:37 +0100, Rob Snelders wrote: > I have created a patch that enables users to add and remove Color Charts. Oooh, nice :-) I had a play with Tools->Options->Chart colors, and it seems to work very nicely - I tried the corner cases of no colors, and so on and

Re: [Libreoffice] GSOC 2011 - Android project - pointers ...

Hello Maxime and Michael, >Personally (what with time-to-market etc.) I think we should target the > latest android API version - ie. API level 9 - which gives us a lot of > nice (pre-wrapped) C APIs for talking to the system. Shouldn't we use the lastest API level 11, of Android 3.0 plat

Re: [Libreoffice] -Woverloaded-virtual

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 20:51 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > Following the usual naming scheme the XAccessibleEventBroadcaster > add/remove on should have been named > [add|remove]AccessibleEventListener in the first place, I guess we're > stuck with that one now. Hmm - are those interfa

[Libreoffice] GSOC 2011 - Android project - pointers ...

Hi Maxime, On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 23:13 -0400, Maxime Côté wrote: > My name is Maxime Côté, I'm a student from Québec. I'm interested in > participating in the GSOC this year with LibreOffice. To be more > precise I'm interested in porting it to Android as I already have good > knowledge of Java, C

[Libreoffice] NLPsolver broken in master ?

Hi all, does anybody have tried recently to compile the master with NLPsolver extension enabled ? Since yesterday it does not work anymore for me. Make fails with de following error message : > > * > * Running the post downloa

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] allow one anonymous db range per sheet in calc

Hi Markus, It took me a little to get to your patch, but finally I've been able to get around to reviewing it. On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 17:43 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > so there is the next try. I've just followed Koheis' suggestions and > made the anonymous db a part of ScTable. So, this loo

Re: [Libreoffice] first post and patch proposition (condfrmt)

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 01:05 +0100, Bob wrote: > It's my first post on this mailing list. Welcome ! :-) > Until 3 years ago, I posted regulary on french ooo lists. I return on > the french dev list but it's a nomanland ;-) only 3 messages ! > I think everybody is coming on LibreOffice :-

[Libreoffice] GSOC 2011 - Android project

Hi all, My name is Maxime Côté, I'm a student from Québec. I'm interested in participating in the GSOC this year with LibreOffice. To be more precise I'm interested in porting it to Android as I already have good knowledge of Java, C++ and a basic knowledge of Android, but I really want to learn m

[Libreoffice] GSOC 2011 regarding - Project Idea.

Hello there, This time I'm planning to take part in Google Summer of code 2011 and I saw the LO was mentioned in the participating organisation. So I'd like to work on some of the ideas proposed on the LO's GSOC wiki but before that I came

[Libreoffice] Review needed to try to resurrect "add slide thumbnails to HTML export" part

Hello, I worked a little on "add slide thumbnails to HTML export" part. The code compiles ok with Debian testing updated x86 (and no parameter at all in autogen), gcc (Debian 4.5.2-4) I only tried this : - create a impress document with 2 slides - export to XHTML, HTML and save it in test.htm

Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build

Hi, On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:16:35PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 17:10 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > Yes, it does. One might even consider to put even the X86 and X86_64 > > specifics in an own file > > Yeah, attached is what I propose to push if there's no objec

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 35480 - Curves have round control points with black background (Draw) (if confirmed)

24.03.2011 09:02, Thorsten Behrens пишет: Clio wrote: The problem is in the file markers2.png. If saved (in GIMP) as illustrated on the screenshot (RGB Mode applied before saving it), then all looks fine in Draw. In hg.services.openoffice.org the file markers2.png have size 4.3kB, the newly save

Re: [Libreoffice] -Woverloaded-virtual

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 17:29 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > a list of warnings (duplicates removed). > I don't want to enable the warning right now, since although I've > already reduced the number of warnings, I don't want to enable this > too soon. Is that the full list ?, or just part of it. If it

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Adding and Removing Color Charts

Hi I have created a patch that enables users to add and remove Color Charts. -- Greetings, Rob Snelders >From 4188ad2d7911a898a283d6dccdfe84bb1f0ef1ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Snelders Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:33:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Added the Adding and removing of color charts

Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 21:18 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > So I am still a bit unsure about separating unxgcc.mk out. Do > you intend that file to also be used by OSX? I intend it to be reused by the (other) bsds e.g. openbsd, as well as e.g. aix. Currently for the "classic" dmake solution see

Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build

Hi Caolán, On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:16:35 + Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 17:10 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > Yes, it does. One might even consider to put even the X86 and X86_64 > > specifics in an own file > > Yeah, attached is what I propose to push if there's no obj

[Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...

* Present: + Michael, Thorsten, Kendy, Caolan, + Norbert, Petr, David, Kohei, Andras * Previous Action Items: AA: new Evo addresbook bug - not done (Michael) download javascript test site setup: Christian did it post a dependency graph of split modules: Petr pos

Re: [Libreoffice] first post and patch proposition (condfrmt)

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 01:05 +0100, Bob wrote: > Hello everybody, > > It's my first post on this mailing list. > Until 3 years ago, I posted regulary on french ooo lists. I return on > the french dev list but it's a nomanland ;-) only 3 messages ! > I think everybody is coming on LibreOffice :-) >

Re: [Libreoffice] Maltese Spell Checker

Not trying to hijack the thread here Clifton. I am a part of the MLUG (linux user group) here in malta and we are having a meeting this saturday if your interested in joining to discuss what Caolan suggested in regards to conversion into hunspell format. Let me know if you would like more deta

Re: [Libreoffice] -Woverloaded-virtual

On Thursday 24 of March 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > You know - seeing a lot of warnings has a focusing effect on the mind, > and helps people work on cleaning them up - assuming there are not a > bazillion duplicates of each of them (are there ?) :-) That's exactly the problem. There were

Re: [Libreoffice] -Woverloaded-virtual

On Thursday 24 of March 2011, Lubos Lunak wrote: > Attached is a patch for introducing the warning (quite obvious) and a list > of warnings (duplicates removed). I don't want to enable the warning right > now, since although I've already reduced the number of warnings, I don't > want to enable thi

Re: [Libreoffice] -Woverloaded-virtual

Hi Lubos, On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 17:29 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > I want to introduce the usage of the gcc -Woverloaded-virtual switch. The > switch warns about the following situation: Looks sexy to me :-) nice work ! > Attached is a patch for introducing the warning (quite obvious)

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] allow one anonymous db range per sheet in calc

Hello, so there is the next try. I've just followed Koheis' suggestions and made the anonymous db a part of ScTable. Patch is of course under LGPLv3+/MPL. Markus P.S. Sry that patch is not created with git format-patch but I don't know how to create a patch against a specific point 2011/3/22 K

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] fix obvious bug in VCL that prevent glyph-fallback for one glyph-missing character at the end of string

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 21:27 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: > While working on other bugs, we found this bug in > vcl/win/source/gdi/salgdi3.cxx b/vcl/win/source/gdi/salgdi3.cxx . When > there is only one character at the end of the string that require > glyph-fallback, the bug prevent glyph-fallba

[Libreoffice] development summary: year 2011, week 11

Hi, this time a brief summary of what happened during the 11th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:hot LO-3.4 development + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for next LO-3.3.x bug fix release + libreoffice-3-3-2: final stabilizatio

Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 17:10 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Yes, it does. One might even consider to put even the X86 and X86_64 > specifics in an own file Yeah, attached is what I propose to push if there's no objections. include linux-ARCH.mk and linux-ARCH sets its specific magic and include

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix obvious bug in VCL that prevent glyph-fallback for one glyph-missing character at the end of string

While working on other bugs, we found this bug in vcl/win/source/gdi/salgdi3.cxx b/vcl/win/source/gdi/salgdi3.cxx . When there is only one character at the end of the string that require glyph-fallback, the bug prevent glyph-fallbacking. Because the code will not detect that the last character

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Removed never defined _ENABLE_CUR_DIR

Hi Christina, your patch looks good, thanks! Pushed. Cheers Radek On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 19:28 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > Hi, > > I've continued code cleanup and removed #ifdef'ed blocks because > _ENABLE_CUR_DIR is never #defined. > > Christina > _

[Libreoffice] Cобeседование при приеме нa pабoту.

> УПPАВЛЕНИЕ ОТДEЛOМ ПPОДАЖ > Тpенинг • 30 маpта • 2011 г. > г. Kиев • бульв. Шевченкo, 4 • oтель «Cанкт-Пeтeрбург» > Тeл.: (044) 223-4882, 223-5141 -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- Отбиpая людeй, ищитe тaлaнт, a нe пpоcто oпыт, интеллeкт или

Re: [Libreoffice] XCU and XCS files in recent releases

On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 19:29 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Em 21-03-2011 18:48, Cor Nouws escreveu: > > Hi Olivier, > > > > Olivier Hallot wrote (21-03-11 22:29) > >> In version 3.2 of OpenOffice we had the feature below implemented > >> > >> (allow to configure Base to forbid creation on a new loc

Re: [Libreoffice] LO release web-accessible changelog?

Kevin Hunter wrote: > Do we have a page that I'm missing akin to either of these? And if > not, would others agree that they would be of use? > I tend to summarize changes in my RC announcements (e.g. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-3-3-2-Release-Candidate-2-available-tp2696004p2

Re: [Libreoffice] Maltese Spell Checker

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 13:53 +0100, clif...@gmail.com wrote: > I am proposing the introduction of the Maltese spell checker inside > the libreoffice. This will be the first office suite that will have a > Maltese spell checker. Apart of adding this dictionary file that I > have attached the file on

Re: [Libreoffice] Maltese Spell Checker

2011/3/24 clif...@gmail.com : > I am proposing the introduction of the Maltese spell checker inside the > libreoffice. This will be the first office suite that will have a Maltese > spell checker. Apart of adding this dictionary file that I have attached the > file on https://bugs.freedesktop.org/s

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 35480 - Curves have round control points with black background (Draw) (if confirmed)

Clio wrote: > The problem is in the file markers2.png. If saved (in GIMP) as > illustrated on the screenshot (RGB Mode applied before saving it), > then all looks fine in Draw. In hg.services.openoffice.org the file > markers2.png have size 4.3kB, the newly saved file has the same size > around 4.3

[Libreoffice] Maltese Spell Checker

I am proposing the introduction of the Maltese spell checker inside the libreoffice. This will be the first office suite that will have a Maltese spell checker. Apart of adding this dictionary file that I have attached the file on https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35590 I would like to

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#32413: Add an apply button to style edit dialog in Writer

Hi, I'm attaching two patches, one for vcl, one for sw. Of course I could introduce the define in sw, but that would cause problems when someone would introduce a new define in vcl, so I did it this way. Also, I can change the indentation in sw/source/ui/app/docst.cxx, I didn't do it yet for easi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Remove date from cfg files: 07.07.04 00:00:00

Radek Doulik píše v Čt 24. 03. 2011 v 09:43 +0100: > Hi Thomas, > > I would like to know, what these dates are for in the .cfg files, before > we remove them. I am giving Cc to Petr as he might know helpcontent2 > module innards. > > Cheers > Radek > > On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 14:26 +0100, Thomas A

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] removing the executable mode from some source files

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:58:44PM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > Can you send me the git-hook pre-commit so I can try to modify it to make > > this tests automatically? > > but it should be in your git clone, surely? And whenever you invoke './g', it enables them in the local repo. Do a 'g d

Re: [Libreoffice] first post and patch proposition (condfrmt)

Hi Bob, I'm small contributor myself in the community, without any saying whatsoever. Still I must say that I think you have done a great job. I have been frustrated in the past over the limited number of conditions that you could apply, and I know a few others in my surrounding who think the same.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Remove unused macro DECL_DEST_LIST

Hi Rafael, looks good to me, thanks! Pushed. Please change your git config, so that it includes your real name instead of npcdoom. like: git config --global user.name "Rafael Dominguez" Cheers Radek ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.fr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove date from cfg files: 07.07.04 00:00:00

Hi Thomas, I would like to know, what these dates are for in the .cfg files, before we remove them. I am giving Cc to Petr as he might know helpcontent2 module innards. Cheers Radek On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 14:26 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Hi, > > are these dates necessary?! I've compiled it w

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translate Comments

Am 24.03.2011 07:03, schrieb Pierre-André Jacquod: Hello, looks good, pushed. I think "Java-Call absetzen" means "issue java-call" not "turn off java-call". Christina Thanks Pierre-André On 03/23/2011 11:19 PM, Rob Snelders wrote: Hi, I have translated some comments in the libs-core/conne

Re: [Libreoffice] .fodt format broken

Hi, I haven't updated for a while, but I could do that tonight and see if something suspicious gets pulled (or debug into the export, if updating breaks it here, too) Bye, Peter Am 24.03.2011 um 07:18 schrieb Pierre-André Jacquod : > Hello, > after having made a full compile, I have seen

Re: [Libreoffice] .fodt format broken

Hi, On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:18:17AM +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > after having made a full compile, I have seen that the support for > .fodt file format (plain xml) is broken. I tested this file format > (created a file,...) about one month ago, and all was well, but now > you just get a