[Libreoffice] Hi, I'm Freddy and I have a question about GDI?

Hello, I was searching online to find more info about GDI and I came across your information. I found your name here: %Webpage Location% Can you tell me, are you still involved with GDI? If you are, how are things going for you? Please let me know. Sincerely, Freddy

[Libreoffice] Communication, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP Customer Lists

Hi, This email is to introduce Repharm Technologies and lists we provide. We have a comprehensive business database of B2B records & B2C records. Our lists can be used Email Campaigns, Telemarketing, Fax Marketing and Direct Mailing. The list would be for your perpetual use with no restriction

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] get rid of duplicated .gitattributes files

Hi, So far we have 4 .gitattributes files in the root of 4 repos with the same contents. To have them in the rest of the repos and avoid duplication, it's better to have a single one in the bootstrap repo and configure the rest of the repos to use that one. I'm attaching two patches: 1) is for b

Re: [Libreoffice] Rewiew needed for pythonscript.py patch (new try)

Le 12/03/2011 23:38, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Julien Nabet wrote: Here is a new try for fixing warning/error pychecker in the .py files of libs-core/scripting/source/pyprov Could anybody tell me if this is ok (and i can push it myself) or not ? T

Re: [Libreoffice] Rewiew needed for pythonscript.py patch (new try)

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Julien Nabet wrote: > > Here is a new try for fixing warning/error pychecker in the .py files of > libs-core/scripting/source/pyprov > Could anybody tell me if this is ok (and i can push it myself) or not ? This time you forgot to attach the patch :-) ciao Chris

[Libreoffice] Rewiew needed for pythonscript.py patch (new try)

Hello, Here is a new try for fixing warning/error pychecker in the .py files of libs-core/scripting/source/pyprov Could anybody tell me if this is ok (and i can push it myself) or not ? This time I used this to check there is no tabs and spaces mixed. python -tt ppythonscript.py This one has on

Re: [Libreoffice] Free JRE for Windows?

On 12-03-2011 22:05, Dave Johnson wrote: > > the data base is essential for small biz and medical research. > > Dave Johnson > i would not want my doctor to use this for medical research if my health has to do with it. ;) >> On Mar 12, 2011 1:28 PM, "Tor Lillqvist" >

Re: [Libreoffice] bool vs. sal_bool

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > Hi, > > I thought, I could start replacing some BOOL by bool. But when I started to > edit docuno.{hxx,cxx} I saw that there is not only BOOL and bool but also > sal_Bool. When do I use which of the boolean types? Please put that work

[Libreoffice] bool vs. sal_bool

Hi, I thought, I could start replacing some BOOL by bool. But when I started to edit docuno.{hxx,cxx} I saw that there is not only BOOL and bool but also sal_Bool. When do I use which of the boolean types? Christina Rossmanith ___ LibreOffice mailin

Re: [Libreoffice] Free JRE for Windows?

the data base is essential for small biz and medical research. Dave Johnson On Mar 12, 2011 1:28 PM, "Tor Lillqvist" wrote: > And for Base, who is using that? Maybe you should do a search on our bugzilla for bug reports against it. (Sure, personally I don't think Base makes much sense either,

Re: [Libreoffice] Free JRE for Windows?

> And for Base, who is using that? Maybe you should do a search on our bugzilla for bug reports against it. (Sure, personally I don't think Base makes much sense either, and would gladly drop it. But try telling that to all the people who think it is an essential part of this "suite".) --tml

[Libreoffice] EasyHacks: Reanimated tests in ure/cppuhelper/qa

I attach some other reanimated tests. I had to deactivate the test 'test_weak.cxx' in prj/build.lst. This test failed with 'error 139' - this is typically a segfault during test execution, oops. I had no time to investigate this issue up to now, sorry. Wilhelm >From 7e69d8f2b3e09c75b21dee9d0849

Re: [Libreoffice] Free JRE for Windows?

On 12/03/2011 10:26, Francois Tigeot wrote: For the rest, I believe Java is still needed for some wizards and Base. I can't be 100% sure, these are not parts of LO I'm familiar with. In the past i've tried the Windows version for some times without Java, for very simple tasks and i recall it i

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add non blank characters in meta informations

Hello This patch add non blank count in Writter metafile information's. Thanks in advance Arnaud Versini From b37a44cbc6e54a91570620dabe0c2f8a271d4a93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnaud Versini Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:24:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add non blank characters to metafile. ---

Re: [Libreoffice] Review needed for Python part patch

Le 12/03/2011 14:36, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : Hi Julien, *, On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Julien Nabet wrote: Here is a patch for fixing warning/error pychecker in the .py files of libs-core/scripting/source/pyprov Could anybody tell me if this is ok (and i can push it myself) or n

Re: [Libreoffice] Review needed for Python part patch

Hi Julien, *, On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Julien Nabet wrote: > Here is a patch for fixing warning/error pychecker in the .py files of > libs-core/scripting/source/pyprov > Could anybody tell me if this is ok (and i can push it myself) or not ? You mixed tabs and spaces, this is a sure way

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] 1/2 fdo#34896 make color palette size consistent

Le 11/03/2011 21:37, Caolán McNamara a écrit : > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 18:20 +0100, Xavier ALT wrote: >> Le 06/03/2011 10:31, Xavier ALT a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patch series fix make the color palette size consistent everywhere. >>> Related to bug fdo#34896 >>> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Free JRE for Windows?

On 12-03-2011 10:26, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:53:07AM +0100, Luuk wrote: >> On 11-03-2011 18:37, Osama Khalid wrote: >>> I tried to find a binary build for the Java Runtime Environment for >>> Windows so I can distribute and install it freely but I couldn't. >>> >>> Sever

[Libreoffice] Review needed for Python part patch

Hello, Here is a patch for fixing warning/error pychecker in the .py files of libs-core/scripting/source/pyprov Could anybody tell me if this is ok (and i can push it myself) or not ? I already fixed a simple bug (commit 60b368fa19ced4595bfba8068b1e5769a1be187d) but this time I would like to

[Libreoffice] Paste not working, paste special first row is empty

Hi LibreOffice Bug Hunters! I am hitting this problem time by time. However I have no safe way to always reproduce it, I ask you to try to fix it in the next main release: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35243 Thank you for andvance! KAMI -- Best regards, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai |

Re: [Libreoffice] Free JRE for Windows?

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:53:07AM +0100, Luuk wrote: > On 11-03-2011 18:37, Osama Khalid wrote: > > I tried to find a binary build for the Java Runtime Environment for > > Windows so I can distribute and install it freely but I couldn't. > > > > Several components of LibreOffice depend on JRE and

Re: [Libreoffice] Free JRE for Windows?

On 12-03-2011 09:53, Luuk wrote: > On 11-03-2011 18:37, Osama Khalid wrote: >> I tried to find a binary build for the Java Runtime Environment for >> Windows so I can distribute and install it freely but I couldn't. >> >> Several components of LibreOffice depend on JRE and I encounter many >> warni

Re: [Libreoffice] Free JRE for Windows?

On 11-03-2011 18:37, Osama Khalid wrote: > I tried to find a binary build for the Java Runtime Environment for > Windows so I can distribute and install it freely but I couldn't. > > Several components of LibreOffice depend on JRE and I encounter many > warning message boxes on start up without it,