I'm trying to build LO.
This is what I did:
# mkdir git
# cd git
# git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap libo
# ./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=2 --with-max-jobs=1 --without-junit
--disable-graphite
# make
and the build failed citing to re-build cppunit.
I run:
# source *Env
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> Hi Norbert,
>
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:06:00 -0600
> Norbert Thiebaud
> wrote:
>
>> I wonder, what's wrong with setting up ~/.ssh/config properly so that
>> you don't need to put a user in the .git/config ?
>> i.e:
>>
>> Host *.freedeskt
I'm sorry to be emailing again, but I think I have other relevant
information.
The output of make contains dozens of lines of the form:
ERROR: File not found: *
where * are a bunch of TTF files, and others that seem rather important
based on their names name, like pythonhelper.py, unohelper.py,
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > I wonder, what's wrong with setting up ~/.ssh/config properly so that
> > you don't need to put a user in the .git/config ?
> > i.e:
> >
> > Host *.freedesktop.org
> > User
> > IdentityFile
>
> Most newcomers will have an anongit url and thus can not push to it.
> B
Hello, everyone!
I've recently been attracted to LibreOffice development, particularly in
Writer. I've followed general guidelines on the Web, but try as I might, I
always end up having the same error in 'more_fonts'.
This is what I did:
$ git (blah blah)
$ ./autogen --with-num-cpus=2
$ make fet
Hello Michael, Jonas, Caolán,
> Great - pushed there;
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael.
>
I hope I'm not waffling, but I'm very thankful to you guys for looking
at this. And thanks for taking care of closing the bugs.
Thanks,
Luke
I pushed it. Thanks!
On 02/10/2011 07:03 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I removed these two variables this afternoon ;) I'll push the rest in
> some hours. Thanks, didn't see that at all!
>
> Thomas
>
> On 02/10/2011 06:11 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an easy hack against ca
Hi Norbert,
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:06:00 -0600
Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> I wonder, what's wrong with setting up ~/.ssh/config properly so that
> you don't need to put a user in the .git/config ?
> i.e:
>
> Host *.freedesktop.org
> User
> IdentityFile
Most newcomers will have an anongit url a
Hullo List,
Same as earlier, EasyHack cppcheck-found post to pre increment iterator.
Cheers,
Kevin
>From d623b58d83d254893dd212548461e492e3c2d13b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hunter
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:24:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] cppcheck: post- to pre- *crement change.
---
cr
OS : Win_x86
Antoine
-Message d'origine-
De : libreoffice-bounces+antoine.pourchez=kelis...@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+antoine.pourchez=kelis...@lists.freedesktop.org]
De la part de Caolán McNamara
Envoyé : jeudi 10 février 2011 22:03
À : Antoine POURCHEZ; Petr Mlad
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 12:19 +0100, Antoine POURCHEZ wrote:
> Hi,
> Some jar LibreOffice3.3 (Juhl, Jurt, ...) have been compiled with a
> JRE1.6, contrary to the same jar in OpenOffice3.3 remaining compatible
> with JRE1.5.
> Is it a choice or a compilation error?
What OS was this btw.
Petr: Do we
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|32930 |
--- Comment #19 from Michael Meeks 201
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 15:18 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
> Anyone agree that we should change the LibreOffice default UI font
> list?
In the VCL.xcu it shouldn't matter if a font listed isn't found. It
should just try the next one. So removing it from that list shouldn't
help much. The trick ma
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894
Bug 32894 depends on bug 33785, which changed state.
Bug 33785 Summary: Particular WMF causes crash
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33785
What|Old Value |New Value
---
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:35 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Hullo List,
>
> A simple cppcheck easyhack.
Thanks for this, looks good even though I don't have MacOSX, pushed.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.fr
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote:
>> the clone we recommend on the web-site has:
>>
>> url = git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/bootstrap
>>
> which seems wrong, I've corrected it (there's an extra /git/ in
> there).
>
>> so the
[Resending, this time to the list.]
Hi Michael,
At 8:06am -0500 Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Michael Meeks committed:
starmath/source/visitors.cxx |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 60c297cc61df9ef025312f75ba214b4a8499e959
Author: Luke Dixon<6b8b4...@gmail.c
Hi,
I removed these two variables this afternoon ;) I'll push the rest in
some hours. Thanks, didn't see that at all!
Thomas
On 02/10/2011 06:11 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an easy hack against calc.
>
> Cheers,
> -- Takeshi Abe
>
>
>
> _
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 18:10 +0100, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote:
> If we get another review of the patch, we could put it into
> libreoffice-3-3-1
..
> If there both a libreoffice-3-3 and libreoffice-3-3-1, and think it's
> fine to push it to both...
Great - pushed there;
Hi,
Sorry, I'm so slow to reply... School is keeping me busy...
Anyway, the patch looks fine...
I've pushed your patch for libreoffice-3-3
Great... - again sorry I'm so slow...
If we get another review of the patch, we could put it
> into libreoffice-3-3-1
If there both a libreoffice-3-3 and
Hi,
This is an easy hack against calc.
Cheers,
-- Takeshi Abe
>From de04998fb7efeacd0fda5a929b7a737e73154dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Takeshi Abe
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:55:12 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] remove unused variables and indistinguishable branching
---
sc/source/ui/view/tabview2.
Michael Meeks wrote:
> the clone we recommend on the web-site has:
>
> url = git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/bootstrap
>
which seems wrong, I've corrected it (there's an extra /git/ in
there).
> so the regexp should fix that; but - as you say, Thorsten's config
> manipu
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:26 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
> The reason for dropping stlport is its license, isn't it?
Nope; stlport is Free Software albeit not copy-left. We'll continue to
distribute it for a bit, as old extensions may require it.
HTH,
Michael.
-
Oh, didn't see the link. Didn't know that it's already on the web! I'm
not sure if everybody knows that there are logs on the web, maybe you
could add this link to the tinderbox mails :)
Thomas
On 02/10/2011 04:38 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> To have that log on the web would be nice (not all pers
To have that log on the web would be nice (not all persons have a big
mail account - some mail providers only give you a few megabytes at all).
I did a fresh build with a git clone from the morning and there were no
errors at all.
Thomas
On 02/10/2011 02:55 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> Would it b
Hullo List,
A simple cppcheck easyhack.
Kevin
>From 0a4b85e9586adf6942f9b061733db9959c2c41d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hunter
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:31:10 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] cppcheck: post- to pre- *crement change.
---
vcl/aqua/source/app/salinst.cxx |2 +-
1 files chang
Hi Christian,
On 2011-02-10 at 15:34 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >> Would it be acceptable to get the full build log in case something goes
> >> wrong?
> >
> > Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web somewhere,
> > and just point to the relevant one in the tinderbo
Michael Meeks wrote:
> And I was wondering - now that valgrind runs nicely on that
> platform ;-) whether we couldn't get a good stack trace or so from it
> [ export G_SLICE=1 before running to turn off the slab allocation I
> guess ].
>
> Or do other people not see this ?
>
At least
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Fridrich Strba
wrote:
> LibreOffice does not use STLport anymore and uses the toolchain's STL
> implementation
The reason for dropping stlport is its license, isn't it?
http://www.stlport.org/product.html
Free Commercial Use:
There are absolutely no re
Hi *,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> Would it be acceptable to get the full build log in case something goes
>> wrong?
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web somewhere,
> and just point to the relevant one in the tinderbox mail?
http://tind
Hi Balint,
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:01 +0100, Bálint Dózsa wrote:
> This is my first patch :-)
Welcome to the team :-) I've pushed it, can you confirm that your code
will be licensed under the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license.
Thanks !
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell
Hi Nigel,
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:57 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> The first attached patch removes the last use of SvBytes (from svx).
> The second patch removes the declaration of it from svl.
So - with such a run of nice patches, it'd be great if you could
request git commit access :-
Hy,
This is my first patch :-)
Regards,
Balint Dozsa
From 4c37d7f4cc459bbbcc0f9a642de159727e5bacc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?B=C3=A1lint=20D=C3=B3zsa?=
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:17:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove some dead code
---
sc/source/ui/drawfunc/chartsh.cxx |1 -
s
Hello Michael,
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 12:33 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> So - I think this is way too big to ship between 3.3.1 RC1 and our
> final release of that; so - I'd say no for 3.3.1. I'd say yes for 3.3
> (and hence 3.3.2) but I have a few questions:
Ok.
> When writing we do
> Would it be acceptable to get the full build log in case something goes
> wrong?
Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web somewhere, and
just point to the relevant one in the tinderbox mail?
Would it be possible to in a simple way enhance build.pl to optionally redirec
Hi,
Recently I have heard complaints that the mails from the tinderbox do
not contain the actual bug. It seems to me that the behavior of
build.pl changed a bit, it does not stop immediately after the mistake,
but tries to continue as further as possible even with just one process
(build -P1 --al
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 01:24:15PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg
>
> which is not in the system path; perhaps that is some distribution
> specific thing (Rene ?).
No, unopkg certainly isn't distro-specific. Any system-wide apppearance
of unopkg (e..g
Hi Philipp,
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:11 +0100, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote:
> I've ported unopkg.man to LibreOffice.
Great :-)
> As I couldn't find unopkg with LibO 3.3 I couldn't test the options in
> the man page.
Oh ? I have:
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg
whi
Hi Luke,
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 20:50 +, Luke Dixon wrote:
> I guess I'm too late now, so maybe for 3.3.2, but maybe there are a
> couple of bugs that could be fixed for libreoffice-3-3.
I've pushed your patch for libreoffice-3-3 - but really, with you and
Jonas' review you could have
Hi Cedric,
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 12:08 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Could you please review the patch attached to this bug report for
> inclusion in 3.3 and 3.3.1 branches?
So - I think this is way too big to ship between 3.3.1 RC1 and our
final release of that; so - I'd say no for 3.
Hi Cedric
On 10/02/11 11:08, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hello fellow hackers,
Could you please review the patch attached to this bug report for
inclusion in 3.3 and 3.3.1 branches?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34064
The corresponding code has been pushed to master, but cherry-pick
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:24 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch removes one use of SvBytes and SvXub_StrLens from
> SwScriptInfo.
bzzt...
-while ( nChg < rTxt.Len() || ( !aScriptChg.Count() && !
rTxt.Len() ) )
+while ( nChg < rTxt.Len() || ( !aScriptChanges.empty() &
Hello fellow hackers,
Could you please review the patch attached to this bug report for
inclusion in 3.3 and 3.3.1 branches?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34064
The corresponding code has been pushed to master, but cherry-picking may
not be easy due to conflicting changes in maste
On Thursday 10 of February 2011, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> Hello, good people,
>
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 20:24 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > > Hmm, how does this actually work? This file has --disable-kde4
> > > (and --disable-kde too I presume, I can't actually find this file
> > > anywhere), so
Hi Thorsten,
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:56 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> hm, that looks slightly broken - plus, I wonder if that's really a
> smooth workflow.
Well - I want a line I can remember, type, and look up quickly [ ie.
without using the web ], since I have to write this in E-mai
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Anyhow - overall a positive move no doubt.
The biggest win, for me anyway, is that the beginning-to-become unwieldy
"magic header to mix stlport c++ and system c++ libraries" hack goes
away, so native c++ libraries can be linked to th
Hi guys,
I hear rumour of frequent crashes on exit from our mac builds - though
also clean running during presentations etc. I guess a test case would
be loading a slide deck, showing some slides, then exiting.
And I was wondering - now that valgrind runs nicely on that
platform ;
Hi Viktor (or is it Michael Rohm?),
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 10:32 +0300, Viktor Viktor wrote:
> I am a user of open source software. I am also a writer and using
> LibreOffice having trouble with layout of books.
..
> Given the above I ask you to consider developing a similar product
> in the LibreO
Hi Rob,
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 22:36 +0100, Rob Snelders wrote:
> Here is a small patch that translates some comments I forgot last patch.
Thanks for that :-) I just pushed it. As Fridrich says, it can help to
have it as git format-patch output; to get that you need to commit
first:
Hi Fridrich,
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:44 +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> The hash_map, hash_multimap, hash_set and hash_multiset are remplaced by
> boost::unordered_map, boost::unordered_multimap, boost::unordered_set
> and boost::unordered_multiset. As well, the std::hash is replaced by
> boost::h
PUSHED this one. Sorry for the mangled email address. I read the list
through gmane and did not realize before I read the CIA bot on irc.
Subscribing from gmail now and will push like that.
Cheers
Fridrich
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 15:28 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:57 +00
Would it be possible to have this one as a result of "git
format-patch" ?
Fridrich
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 22:36 +0100, Rob Snelders wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a small patch that translates some comments I forgot last patch.
>
> I submit this patch under LGPLv3+/MPL-Licence.
>
PUSHED, thanks
F.
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:57 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The first attached patch removes the last use of SvBytes (from svx).
> The second patch removes the declaration of it from svl.
>
> This should eradicate it from the main code, but still leaves another
> de
Hi Fridrich,
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:44:25 +0100
Fridrich Strba
wrote:
> LibreOffice does not use STLport anymore and uses the toolchain's STL
> implementation. We build the stlport module for the platforms where it
> was used before and we deliver it into solver and package it for the
> compatib
PUSHED, thanks
F.
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:41 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Please find attached patches that removes the Hyperlink Bar from impress and
> draw (made
>
> available under LGPLv3+/MPL).
> Patches have been rebased with origin/master, compiled and tested before
> s
PUSHED, thanks a log
F.
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:40 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached patches that removes the Hyperlink Bar from writer (made
> available under LGPLv3+/MPL).
> Patches have been rebased with origin/master, compiled and tested before
> submission.
>
Pushed, keep on the good work.
Cheers.
Fridrich
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 03:15 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a couple of tiny patches under LGPLv3+/MPL.
>
> Cheers,
> -- Takeshi Abe
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freede
57 matches
Mail list logo