[Libreoffice] build error with cppunit - Making install in DllPlugInTester

2011-02-10 Thread Kishan Bhat
I'm trying to build LO. This is what I did: # mkdir git # cd git # git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap libo # ./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=2 --with-max-jobs=1 --without-junit --disable-graphite # make and the build failed citing to re-build cppunit. I run: # source *Env

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - g

2011-02-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:06:00 -0600 > Norbert Thiebaud > wrote: > >> I wonder, what's wrong with setting up ~/.ssh/config properly so that >> you don't need to put a user in the .git/config ? >> i.e: >> >> Host *.freedeskt

Re: [Libreoffice] Noob needs help in first ever build: more_fonts does not build

2011-02-10 Thread João Ferreira
I'm sorry to be emailing again, but I think I have other relevant information. The output of make contains dozens of lines of the form: ERROR: File not found: * where * are a bunch of TTF files, and others that seem rather important based on their names name, like pythonhelper.py, unohelper.py,

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - g

2011-02-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > I wonder, what's wrong with setting up ~/.ssh/config properly so that > > you don't need to put a user in the .git/config ? > > i.e: > > > > Host *.freedesktop.org > > User > > IdentityFile > > Most newcomers will have an anongit url and thus can not push to it. > B

[Libreoffice] Noob needs help in first ever build: more_fonts does not build

2011-02-10 Thread jotomicron
Hello, everyone! I've recently been attracted to LibreOffice development, particularly in Writer. I've followed general guidelines on the Web, but try as I might, I always end up having the same error in 'more_fonts'. This is what I did: $ git (blah blah) $ ./autogen --with-num-cpus=2 $ make fet

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2011-02-10 Thread Luke Dixon
Hello Michael, Jonas, Caolán, > Great - pushed there; > > Thanks, > > Michael. > I hope I'm not waffling, but I'm very thankful to you guys for looking at this. And thanks for taking care of closing the bugs. Thanks, Luke

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] remove unused variables and indistinguishable branching

2011-02-10 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I pushed it. Thanks! On 02/10/2011 07:03 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Hi, > > I removed these two variables this afternoon ;) I'll push the rest in > some hours. Thanks, didn't see that at all! > > Thomas > > On 02/10/2011 06:11 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is an easy hack against ca

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - g

2011-02-10 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Norbert, On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:06:00 -0600 Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > I wonder, what's wrong with setting up ~/.ssh/config properly so that > you don't need to put a user in the .git/config ? > i.e: > > Host *.freedesktop.org > User > IdentityFile Most newcomers will have an anongit url a

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] easyhack: cppcheck pre/post change

2011-02-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, Same as earlier, EasyHack cppcheck-found post to pre increment iterator. Cheers, Kevin >From d623b58d83d254893dd212548461e492e3c2d13b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Hunter Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:24:34 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] cppcheck: post- to pre- *crement change. --- cr

Re: [Libreoffice] JRE1.5 compatibility

2011-02-10 Thread Antoine POURCHEZ
OS : Win_x86 Antoine -Message d'origine- De : libreoffice-bounces+antoine.pourchez=kelis...@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:libreoffice-bounces+antoine.pourchez=kelis...@lists.freedesktop.org] De la part de Caolán McNamara Envoyé : jeudi 10 février 2011 22:03 À : Antoine POURCHEZ; Petr Mlad

Re: [Libreoffice] JRE1.5 compatibility

2011-02-10 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 12:19 +0100, Antoine POURCHEZ wrote: > Hi, > Some jar LibreOffice3.3 (Juhl, Jurt, ...) have been compiled with a > JRE1.6, contrary to the same jar in OpenOffice3.3 remaining compatible > with JRE1.5. > Is it a choice or a compilation error? What OS was this btw. Petr: Do we

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

2011-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 Michael Meeks changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|32930 | --- Comment #19 from Michael Meeks 201

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice default UI font is StarOffice Andale Sans UI ?

2011-02-10 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 15:18 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: > Anyone agree that we should change the LibreOffice default UI font > list? In the VCL.xcu it shouldn't matter if a font listed isn't found. It should just try the next one. So removing it from that list shouldn't help much. The trick ma

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

2011-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 Bug 32894 depends on bug 33785, which changed state. Bug 33785 Summary: Particular WMF causes crash https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33785 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] easyhack: cppcheck pre/post change.

2011-02-10 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:35 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: > Hullo List, > > A simple cppcheck easyhack. Thanks for this, looks good even though I don't have MacOSX, pushed. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.fr

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - g

2011-02-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Michael Meeks wrote: >> the clone we recommend on the web-site has: >> >>       url = git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/bootstrap >> > which seems wrong, I've corrected it (there's an extra /git/ in > there). > >>       so the

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: Branch 'libreoffice-3-3' - starmath/source

2011-02-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
[Resending, this time to the list.] Hi Michael, At 8:06am -0500 Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Michael Meeks committed: starmath/source/visitors.cxx |3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit 60c297cc61df9ef025312f75ba214b4a8499e959 Author: Luke Dixon<6b8b4...@gmail.c

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused variables and indistinguishable branching

2011-02-10 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I removed these two variables this afternoon ;) I'll push the rest in some hours. Thanks, didn't see that at all! Thomas On 02/10/2011 06:11 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > This is an easy hack against calc. > > Cheers, > -- Takeshi Abe > > > > _

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 18:10 +0100, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote: > If we get another review of the patch, we could put it into > libreoffice-3-3-1 .. > If there both a libreoffice-3-3 and libreoffice-3-3-1, and think it's > fine to push it to both... Great - pushed there;

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2011-02-10 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
Hi, Sorry, I'm so slow to reply... School is keeping me busy... Anyway, the patch looks fine... I've pushed your patch for libreoffice-3-3 Great... - again sorry I'm so slow... If we get another review of the patch, we could put it > into libreoffice-3-3-1 If there both a libreoffice-3-3 and

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused variables and indistinguishable branching

2011-02-10 Thread Takeshi Abe
Hi, This is an easy hack against calc. Cheers, -- Takeshi Abe >From de04998fb7efeacd0fda5a929b7a737e73154dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takeshi Abe Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:55:12 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] remove unused variables and indistinguishable branching --- sc/source/ui/view/tabview2.

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - g

2011-02-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote: > the clone we recommend on the web-site has: > > url = git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/bootstrap > which seems wrong, I've corrected it (there's an extra /git/ in there). > so the regexp should fix that; but - as you say, Thorsten's config > manipu

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice is free of STLport

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:26 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: > The reason for dropping stlport is its license, isn't it? Nope; stlport is Free Software albeit not copy-left. We'll continue to distribute it for a bit, as old extensions may require it. HTH, Michael. -

Re: [Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-10 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Oh, didn't see the link. Didn't know that it's already on the web! I'm not sure if everybody knows that there are logs on the web, maybe you could add this link to the tinderbox mails :) Thomas On 02/10/2011 04:38 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > To have that log on the web would be nice (not all pers

Re: [Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-10 Thread Thomas Arnhold
To have that log on the web would be nice (not all persons have a big mail account - some mail providers only give you a few megabytes at all). I did a fresh build with a git clone from the morning and there were no errors at all. Thomas On 02/10/2011 02:55 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> Would it b

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] easyhack: cppcheck pre/post change.

2011-02-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, A simple cppcheck easyhack. Kevin >From 0a4b85e9586adf6942f9b061733db9959c2c41d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Hunter Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:31:10 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] cppcheck: post- to pre- *crement change. --- vcl/aqua/source/app/salinst.cxx |2 +- 1 files chang

Re: [Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Christian, On 2011-02-10 at 15:34 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> Would it be acceptable to get the full build log in case something goes > >> wrong? > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web somewhere, > > and just point to the relevant one in the tinderbo

Re: [Libreoffice] OSX / crash on exit ...

2011-02-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote: > And I was wondering - now that valgrind runs nicely on that > platform ;-) whether we couldn't get a good stack trace or so from it > [ export G_SLICE=1 before running to turn off the slab allocation I > guess ]. > > Or do other people not see this ? > At least

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice is free of STLport

2011-02-10 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Fridrich Strba wrote: > LibreOffice does not use STLport anymore and uses the toolchain's STL > implementation The reason for dropping stlport is its license, isn't it? http://www.stlport.org/product.html Free Commercial Use: There are absolutely no re

Re: [Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-10 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> Would it be acceptable to get the full build log in case something goes >> wrong? > > Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web somewhere, > and just point to the relevant one in the tinderbox mail? http://tind

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Easy Hack - Remove dead code

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Balint, On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:01 +0100, Bálint Dózsa wrote: > This is my first patch :-) Welcome to the team :-) I've pushed it, can you confirm that your code will be licensed under the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license. Thanks ! Michael. -- michael.me...@novell

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][EasyHacks] Removal of SvBytes

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Nigel, On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:57 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > The first attached patch removes the last use of SvBytes (from svx). > The second patch removes the declaration of it from svl. So - with such a run of nice patches, it'd be great if you could request git commit access :-

[Libreoffice] Easy Hack - Remove dead code

2011-02-10 Thread Bálint Dózsa
Hy, This is my first patch :-) Regards, Balint Dozsa From 4c37d7f4cc459bbbcc0f9a642de159727e5bacc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?B=C3=A1lint=20D=C3=B3zsa?= Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:17:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove some dead code --- sc/source/ui/drawfunc/chartsh.cxx |1 - s

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Listbox form fields fixes

2011-02-10 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hello Michael, On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 12:33 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > So - I think this is way too big to ship between 3.3.1 RC1 and our > final release of that; so - I'd say no for 3.3.1. I'd say yes for 3.3 > (and hence 3.3.2) but I have a few questions: Ok. > When writing we do

Re: [Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-10 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Would it be acceptable to get the full build log in case something goes > wrong? Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web somewhere, and just point to the relevant one in the tinderbox mail? Would it be possible to in a simple way enhance build.pl to optionally redirec

[Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi, Recently I have heard complaints that the mails from the tinderbox do not contain the actual bug. It seems to me that the behavior of build.pl changed a bit, it does not stop immediately after the mistake, but tries to continue as further as possible even with just one process (build -P1 --al

Re: [Libreoffice] Ported unopkg man page

2011-02-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 01:24:15PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg > > which is not in the system path; perhaps that is some distribution > specific thing (Rene ?). No, unopkg certainly isn't distro-specific. Any system-wide apppearance of unopkg (e..g

Re: [Libreoffice] Ported unopkg man page

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Philipp, On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:11 +0100, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote: > I've ported unopkg.man to LibreOffice. Great :-) > As I couldn't find unopkg with LibO 3.3 I couldn't test the options in > the man page. Oh ? I have: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg whi

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Luke, On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 20:50 +, Luke Dixon wrote: > I guess I'm too late now, so maybe for 3.3.2, but maybe there are a > couple of bugs that could be fixed for libreoffice-3-3. I've pushed your patch for libreoffice-3-3 - but really, with you and Jonas' review you could have

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Listbox form fields fixes

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Cedric, On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 12:08 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Could you please review the patch attached to this bug report for > inclusion in 3.3 and 3.3.1 branches? So - I think this is way too big to ship between 3.3.1 RC1 and our final release of that; so - I'd say no for 3.

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Listbox form fields fixes

2011-02-10 Thread Noel Power
Hi Cedric On 10/02/11 11:08, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Hello fellow hackers, Could you please review the patch attached to this bug report for inclusion in 3.3 and 3.3.1 branches? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34064 The corresponding code has been pushed to master, but cherry-pick

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][EasyHacks] Remove some use of svarray stuff in SwScriptInfo

2011-02-10 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:24 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch removes one use of SvBytes and SvXub_StrLens from > SwScriptInfo. bzzt... -while ( nChg < rTxt.Len() || ( !aScriptChg.Count() && ! rTxt.Len() ) ) +while ( nChg < rTxt.Len() || ( !aScriptChanges.empty() &

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Listbox form fields fixes

2011-02-10 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hello fellow hackers, Could you please review the patch attached to this bug report for inclusion in 3.3 and 3.3.1 branches? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34064 The corresponding code has been pushed to master, but cherry-picking may not be easy due to conflicting changes in maste

Re: [Libreoffice] re-enable icons on Linux for KDE

2011-02-10 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Thursday 10 of February 2011, Fridrich Strba wrote: > Hello, good people, > > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 20:24 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > > Hmm, how does this actually work? This file has --disable-kde4 > > > (and --disable-kde too I presume, I can't actually find this file > > > anywhere), so

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - g

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Thorsten, On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:56 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > hm, that looks slightly broken - plus, I wonder if that's really a > smooth workflow. Well - I want a line I can remember, type, and look up quickly [ ie. without using the web ], since I have to write this in E-mai

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice is free of STLport

2011-02-10 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Anyhow - overall a positive move no doubt. The biggest win, for me anyway, is that the beginning-to-become unwieldy "magic header to mix stlport c++ and system c++ libraries" hack goes away, so native c++ libraries can be linked to th

[Libreoffice] OSX / crash on exit ...

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, I hear rumour of frequent crashes on exit from our mac builds - though also clean running during presentations etc. I guess a test case would be loading a slide deck, showing some slides, then exiting. And I was wondering - now that valgrind runs nicely on that platform ;

Re: [Libreoffice] Improvement LibreOffice

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Viktor (or is it Michael Rohm?), On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 10:32 +0300, Viktor Viktor wrote: > I am a user of open source software. I am also a writer and using > LibreOffice having trouble with layout of books. .. > Given the above I ask you to consider developing a similar product > in the LibreO

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] translation comments

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rob, On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 22:36 +0100, Rob Snelders wrote: > Here is a small patch that translates some comments I forgot last patch. Thanks for that :-) I just pushed it. As Fridrich says, it can help to have it as git format-patch output; to get that you need to commit first:

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice is free of STLport

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Fridrich, On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:44 +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote: > The hash_map, hash_multimap, hash_set and hash_multiset are remplaced by > boost::unordered_map, boost::unordered_multimap, boost::unordered_set > and boost::unordered_multiset. As well, the std::hash is replaced by > boost::h

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][EasyHacks] Removal of SvBytes

2011-02-10 Thread Fridrich Strba
PUSHED this one. Sorry for the mangled email address. I read the list through gmane and did not realize before I read the CIA bot on irc. Subscribing from gmail now and will push like that. Cheers Fridrich On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 15:28 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:57 +00

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][easy hacks] translation comments

2011-02-10 Thread Fridrich Strba
Would it be possible to have this one as a result of "git format-patch" ? Fridrich On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 22:36 +0100, Rob Snelders wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a small patch that translates some comments I forgot last patch. > > I submit this patch under LGPLv3+/MPL-Licence. >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][EasyHacks] Removal of SvBytes

2011-02-10 Thread Fridrich Strba
PUSHED, thanks F. On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:57 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > Hi all, > > The first attached patch removes the last use of SvBytes (from svx). > The second patch removes the declaration of it from svl. > > This should eradicate it from the main code, but still leaves another > de

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice is free of STLport

2011-02-10 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Fridrich, On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:44:25 +0100 Fridrich Strba wrote: > LibreOffice does not use STLport anymore and uses the toolchain's STL > implementation. We build the stlport module for the platforms where it > was used before and we deliver it into solver and package it for the > compatib

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Remove obsolete Hyperlink Bar from impress_draw

2011-02-10 Thread Fridrich Strba
PUSHED, thanks F. On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:41 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: > Hi, > > > Please find attached patches that removes the Hyperlink Bar from impress and > draw (made > > available under LGPLv3+/MPL). > Patches have been rebased with origin/master, compiled and tested before > s

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Remove obsolete Hyperlink Bar from writer

2011-02-10 Thread Fridrich Strba
PUSHED, thanks a log F. On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:40 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: > Hi, > > Please find attached patches that removes the Hyperlink Bar from writer (made > available under LGPLv3+/MPL). > Patches have been rebased with origin/master, compiled and tested before > submission. >

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] remove dead code and fix memleak

2011-02-10 Thread Fridrich Strba
Pushed, keep on the good work. Cheers. Fridrich On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 03:15 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a couple of tiny patches under LGPLv3+/MPL. > > Cheers, > -- Takeshi Abe ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freede