On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I' ve got these 2 questions :
> 1)
> After a make, make dev-install. If I found a problem with LO, can I just do
> this :
> - source Linux...
> - go to the module I suppose there's the pb
> - make the change
> - build && deliver
> -
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just fixed this bug on master
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33155
>
> and would like to cherry-pick this to the 3.3 branch. Here is the
> relevant commit on master
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffi
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 08:00:05PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 05:59 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Does not fit release blocker criteria, but would still be *very* nice
>> to have for the release, as it easily fixes / papers over a rather
>> annoying / stupid (from t
Hello,
I' ve got these 2 questions :
1)
After a make, make dev-install. If I found a problem with LO, can I just
do this :
- source Linux...
- go to the module I suppose there's the pb
- make the change
- build && deliver
- make dev-install
?
Or must I :
- remove the directory of the install
-
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:58:28PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:18 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> (...) we have to make these three places
>> agree. As to whether it is in the direction of "C/C++ long" everywhere
>> or in the direction of "uno long == sal_Int32" ev
Fyi that was listed on the easy hack page, which i too started working
on, and put down on the wiki that i am working on it. with your
permission would it be ok to use the perl script you created to help
with this task, or edit the wiki and we can work on this together. What
do you think?
On
Hi there,
I just fixed this bug on master
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33155
and would like to cherry-pick this to the 3.3 branch. Here is the
relevant commit on master
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=b6734b453ec636aff3cb14535da24865c9d66d9a
Could someo
On 01/17/2011 07:24 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 01/17/2011 05:38 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 01/17/2011 12:59 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
>>> Thanks! I've been travelling, but I'm back now and will try to test
>>> later this evening on WinXP.
>>
>> OK. Briefly tested and here is what I've found so far:
>>
>> 1. LO &
Hi there,
Attached you will find my first (but not last ;-) ) two patches. I
wrote a Perl script to recursively search repos for "suspicious"
files. (Files with a lot of "empty line, code line, empty line,
code line, ..."). As there are over 100 "suspiciou
Wow. It took 12 hours for my post to show up... I'm really looking forward
to a real Forum...
I agree Tor, only an advanced user like me (and apparently you :) ) has an
empty All Users Desktop folder. And obvioulsy I wouldn't allow a desktop
shortcut if I wasn't testing ;)
But what worries me i
On 01/20/2011 05:50 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
:-) Unfortunately, (I just tried to merge the second patch), it was
included in-line with line-wrapping which mangled it utterly (AFAICS):
Attachments are probably better.
Really sorry this has been a pain to get in - frustr
Hi
Seems like M.Meeks did make some changes and PUSHED it to master:
"cope with change of path, and broken absolute links this generates"
SHA1 ID: 52dc7cfbcdd2b71d789ec1068bebcde44235dcdc
My comment to the patch:
You don't need to use force for ln if you delete the symlink before.
___
Hi there,
I would like to cherry-pick the following from master to
libreoffice-3-3.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=1459e2ba9e441d55c57345130a7c6f3353fa967a
This fixes a pretty annoying cell format import bug from Excel
documents. To reproduce it,
1) Create a new Excel
Hi there,
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 15:49 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> Just announcing I've pushed a feature/sqlite branch to the connectivity
> repo.
I had a look :-)
> It's based on Christian Werner's old code for OOo - note that it's
> "copyright sun", and dates from sqlite's version change
Hi Noel,
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 17:15 +, Noel Power wrote:
> sent to the wrong list...
Code looks unlikely to crash and burn to me; and looks well worth
fixing. So, you have my vote.
Thanks !
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, iti
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 18:51 +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote:
> Oops sorry! I didn't know that /* style comments were deprecated. I
> removed them from my patch and reverted everything to proper // style.
> As I have only very rudimentary knowledge of how doxigen works I thought
> it
This is about to drop off the end of my mailbox I suppose :-)
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:49 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Taking unostrings.cxx there's some template cunning which generates
> objects with the same layout as a OString, but without any constructors,
> so that the StaticInit_OString
Hi Lubos,
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 16:26 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Given that I've pushed for this, I guess I'm the volunteer for this :) ?
> Where should it be located, under
> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/LibreOffice ?
I think we are trying to move all that lot to the document
Hi there,
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 16:59 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Attached please find my first patch to remove white space lines in the
> filter/source/xmlfilteradaptor/genericfilter.cxx
Nice :-)
> feedback is greatly appreciated.
Thanks for that !
> Licensed under LGPL
Attached please find my first patch to remove white space lines in the
filter/source/xmlfilteradaptor/genericfilter.cxx
feedback is greatly appreciated.
Licensed under LGPLv3
>From 744c48dd358a743118ba8cb1bf2162ca7d243df3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jonathan aquilina
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011
On Thursday 20 of January 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 00:28 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > I'm attaching a patch that makes the pre-commit hook warn on introducing
> > undocumented classes.
>
> So - being an un-reconstructed code-reader, and documentation
> Even worse: if you Uninstall LO and the only item on the All Users Desktop
> is the LO lnk, then the uninstaller nicely deletes the folder (which makes
> sense because it is empty).
I could reproduce this in a freshly installed WS2008R2, and thus the same
presumably happens also on Windows 7 an
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:20:45PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On the other hand, I think Andrea is right - my hope is that lots of
> the distributions on every platform will converge more onto the
> LibreOffice core over time, and require fewer patches, and (perhaps) a
> few more configura
Hi Kami,
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 08:10 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
> Any news around this topic?
None that I recall - it's just down to Coverity I guess :-) perhaps
contacting David directly might help. David - previously the
OpenOffice.org coverity output was virtually ignored; we c
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:13 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
..
> > make me think that fragmentation, while of course allowed by the
> > license, should be discouraged when it comes to functionality; I'm not
> > questioning desktop int
Oops.. Sorry, I forgot to mention that this was under Windows XP Pro Sp3.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Serious-bug-on-LO-Windows-installer-tp2294391p2294709.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
On what Windows version did you notice this?
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
I had already detected this and confirmed with the latest installer (for
RC4):
LO installer somehow modifies the attributes of the All Users Desktop folder
when it adds the LibreOffice lnk to the desktop.
The All Users Desktop folder is a System Folder and usually can not be
modified or deleted.
> Should I file a bug for this?
Nah, your email was enough. Patch committed to master, thanks!
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Rene Engelhard píše v St 19. 01. 2011 v 23:07 +0100:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:31:02PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Please, find attached 2nd version of the fix. What do you think about
> > it? ;-)
> >
> > It uses different name for the generated bash function. It works here
> > for the oo* an
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 00:28 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
>> I'm attaching a patch that makes the pre-commit hook warn on introducing
>> undocumented classes.
>
> So - being an un-reconstructed code-reader, and documentatio
Hi Albert,
First - thanks for helping out with this ! as you can see we have big
German comment problems, and it is simply great to have help improving
the situation: much appreciated :-)
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:54 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> I don't think you need to be that careful h
Hi Miklos,
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 00:28 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> I'm attaching a patch that makes the pre-commit hook warn on introducing
> undocumented classes.
So - being an un-reconstructed code-reader, and documentation ignorer -
it would be great to have a link to a wiki page / te
33 matches
Mail list logo
