On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:28:06 -0800, Caolán McNamara
wrote:
Btw, if you were interested in fixing that numbering problem, You might
be interested in this similar bug, e.g.
I brute-forcedly narrowed it down to the following patch, but I'm REALLY
unsure of it. I don't know I should change it to
Hi Philipp,
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:30:18 +0100, Philipp Weissenbacher
wrote:
> As I've promised on IRC some time ago, I updated and extended the
> Go-OO man page for LibreOffice (see attachment).
>
> Important changes to the old [1] one:
> * Adapted it for LibreOffice
> *Added -infilter, -conve
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 12:52 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> BTW how about the patch which starts this thread?
Ah sorry. Well, I just applied your patch, and it indeed does fix the
issue. Now even with the quickstarter running, soffice -help returns
the help content.
Pushed. Thanks a lot for the pa
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:02:27 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>> > I personally would like our startup script to support the standard '--'
>> > type options for long names, and '-' type options for short names just
>> > like everybody else does. So, I support changing all the command line
>> > options
Dear all,
Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I tried to build LibreOffice
3.3.0.1 with locale zh_TW on my Debian Lenny x86_64 5.0.6, gcc 4.3.2,
glibc 2.7. It failed complainting not finding helpcontent2.zip.
Is there anything I need to do to obtain helpcontent2.zip? Thank
you very much i
...I'm so confused. I tried running *zypper si -d lo-unstable*, but I got
an error that source package lo-unstable wasn't found. I have the results
of zypper attached. What happened?
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Jerry Shi píše v St 15. 12. 2010 v 20:57 -
On 12/17/2010 05:34 PM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:18 AM, NoOp wrote:
>> Installing LibORC1on a Windwows system[1] creates an issue with a
>> co-installed OOo install. Once LibO is installed it takes over all .odt
>> etc file properties associations.
>>
>> - LO takes over all
Hi all,
As I've promised on IRC some time ago, I updated and extended the
Go-OO man page for LibreOffice (see attachment).
Important changes to the old [1] one:
* Adapted it for LibreOffice
*Added -infilter, -convert-to and -print-to-file options (with
examples) from /libs-core/desktop/source/app
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Remove call-catcher / bloat removal with sc module
> Compiling sc was ok.
The .bz2 format means one more obstacle to reviewing it.
Norbert
>
> Julien
> (LGPLv3+ / MPL)
>
> ___
> LibreOf
Hi Takeshi,
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 01:20 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:23:04 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 12:44 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> (snip)
> >> Although fixing the -help/-h/-? action in presence of the unix
> >> quickstarter,
>
Hello,
Here is a patch for properties.h of framework
framework compiles ok.
Julien.
(LGPLv3+ / MPL)
commit-d51048d.tar.bz2
Description: application/bzip
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm
Hello,
Remove call-catcher / bloat removal with sc module
Compiling sc was ok.
Julien
(LGPLv3+ / MPL)
commit-2680fc0.tar.bz2
Description: application/bzip
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mai
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:18 AM, NoOp wrote:
> Installing LibORC1on a Windwows system[1] creates an issue with a
> co-installed OOo install. Once LibO is installed it takes over all .odt
> etc file properties associations.
>
> - LO takes over all OOo application defaults & icons.
> - LO uses the s
Installing LibORC1on a Windwows system[1] creates an issue with a
co-installed OOo install. Once LibO is installed it takes over all .odt
etc file properties associations.
- LO takes over all OOo application defaults & icons.
- LO uses the same executable names as OOo (soffice.exe, swriter.exe,
et
Hello,
After a :
./autogen.sh && make clean && make
it works now !
Thank you ! Next time i'll try to think about ./autogen.sh && make
before adding make clean
Julien
Le 17/12/2010 08:14, Julien Nabet a écrit :
Hello Norbert,
I had done a ./g pull -r, I did this again 1 hour ago and I still
Hi Jan, resending for all to see plus adding a thought at the end:
2010/12/17 Jan Holesovsky
>
> I've just seen the test installation of the future LibreOffice site; I
> think it very much fulfills what you are proposing. It is not at the
> end of the installation, but at the time you are downl
On 12/16/2010 03:49 PM, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Dear marketing people, I'm sure Italo will give you some guidance on the
most important ones at the marketing level, but may be you can make also
some proposal and design a page so that he only has to review it.
I have been really flooded by end of
Hi Michael, ;-)
Thanks for the comments. I've started a dedicated thread on the
website list to talk about the content, and i have replied in detail
to you there. IMHO, it's best if we do that, so that we have all the
discussion in one place, and so that everyone can make their comments
in context
Does anyone only have qt-4.7.1.
I get transparent menus and invisible scrollbars in LibreOffice (3.3.0.1).
OpenOffice (3.2.1) looks fine.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoff
Hi Michael, *,
I'll respond to the administrative part
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:56 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
>
> * I'd love to help out with that; how does one get involved with
> the silverstripe goodness ?
To get access
Btw, if you were interested in fixing that numbering problem, You might
be interested in this similar bug, e.g.
1) Type some text, select it, change the formatting, e.g. font size to 18.
Now press end to deselect the text and move to the end of the line.
2) Now click on the bullet icon,
3) Typ
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:35 +0800, imacat wrote:
> Any suggestion how to solve this? Thank you very much.
For the record, I saw a bit of chatter on IRC and it seemed that the
problem was simply missing opengl development headers ? And a
missing/incomplete configure test to detect this at conf
Hi Sophie, all,
On 2010-12-16 at 18:07 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> > How does that sound? If this plan is acceptable for all, I can go
> > ahead, and start working on this :-)
>
> For me it is, and I think that every body will the happy with your
> proposal. Thanks a lot :-)
I have just up
Hi Martin,
On 2010-12-16 at 19:08 +0100, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
> > We can easily show a suggestion to download a localized version of the
> > help on each and every page, if the language is not en_US. With your
> > help (the l10n team), this can be even shown in the native language of
> > the
On 2010/12/17 2:59 AM David Nelson wrote:
I don't have a Macintosh, unfortunately, and I need detailed
instructions for installing LibreOffice on Mac,*also* covering
installation of a language pack
The "Installation Guide OOo 3.x" from http://documentation.openoffice.org/ has complete and
a
Hi Kohei,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:23:04 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 12:44 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
(snip)
>> Although fixing the -help/-h/-? action in presence of the unix quickstarter,
>> it does not support --help yet.
>> I wonder whether soffice should accept the altern
Hi Michael,
On 2010-12-17 at 14:12 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > Well, as we agreed that libreoffice-3-3 gets "git merge"'d to master, I
> > don't think one needs a manual commit there.
>
> Ah - silly me; I've been cherry picking both ways interchangeably as I
> went; presumably the merg
Hi David,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:56 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> The content on those pages is out of date. We're nearly finished
> preparing the new LibreOffice site now. You can view it at
> http://test.libreoffice.org, and the downloads page there is up to
> date. The documentfoundation page
Hi Berhard,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 11:05 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> >> The links here looks a bit strange with 'Beta' while we have been in
> RC phase for some while:
> ...
> The only thing I had to do was to export the download buttons to .png
> and upload them to the issue.
Bril
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Bug 31865 depends on bug 32142, which changed state.
Bug 32142 Summary: Replace "Beta" download buttons for stable release
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32142
What|Old Value |New Value
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 20:42 +0100, Anders Jonsson wrote:
> Two more large heaps of code. These have been commented out since 2004
> and 2007 respectively.
Yup, looks good. Pushed, thanks for this.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freed
Dear all,
I'm having a serious performance/responsiveness issue when using tables in
impress and (surprise)
draw under linux and mac os x (snow leopard)
Altering tables is almost impossible, because it hardly responses to anything
regarding chaning the
size of the table, column width, row heig
Dear all,
Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I tried to compile LibreOffice
3.3.0.1 on my Debian Lenny x86_64 5.0.6, gcc 4.3.2, glibc 2.7. It
failed at the "slideshow" module, and when I digged inside as suggested,
this time it complainted "OGLTrans_TransitionImpl.cxx:1208: error:
‘glActiveTex
Thank YOU for the feedback.
Looking forward to RC2 ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Support-info-links-still-point-to-openoffice-org-tp2101694p2105001.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Hi there,
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 15:38 -0800, plino wrote:
> In the Windows Add/Remove list each program has a link "Click here for
> support information".
Right.
> Clicking on this link for LibreOffice RC1 displays the following window
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n2101694
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:01 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Andras Timar wrote:
> > You (or I) need to patch files in po/ folder, too.
>
> Whoops, good catch. Indeed, there's no translation necessary. Please
> find a patch for the build repo attached.
Looks fine to go in to me.
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 11:16 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Either way, the check looks fine to me; I notice it is pushed to
> > libreoffice-3-3, but (apparently) not to master, is that intentional ?
>
> Well, as we agreed that libreoffice-3-3 gets "git merge"'d to master, I
> don't think on
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 14:25 +0100, Joachim wrote:
> If I look at the different create_SalInstance functions, there is always
> an instance of xxxSalInstance. Right?
There should be, right. That's my understanding.
> So we can move the the PrinterUpdate code in the xxxSalInstances
> classes, kee
On 12/17/2010 11:22 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 19:58 +0100, Joachim wrote:
- The following removed methods were not strictly identical to the
existing:
BOOL PspSalInfoPrinter::Setup( SalFrame* pFrame, ImplJobSetup* pJobSetup )
void vcl_sal::PrinterUpdate::doUpdate()
void v
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 10:22 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 19:58 +0100, Joachim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have found some duplicate classes between vcl/unx and
> > vcl/unx/headless; PspSalInfoPrinter and PspSalPrinter.
> Let me poke at this a bit and see if I can reorganize
Hello,
just as a reminder: Send in your proposals for the LibreOffice FOSDEM
DevRoom until Monday!
Details are available in our wiki at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Events/Fosdem2011
Thanks,
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Docum
Hi Norbert,
On 2010-12-15 at 23:59 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> Ok so I've pushed a feature/gnumake2 branch.
>
> It contain about half of the gnumake2 CWS plus few adjustment due to
> the fact that things have changed in our trees.
Wow, it is big :-)
> All that lead me to conclude that it
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 19:58 +0100, Joachim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have found some duplicate classes between vcl/unx and
> vcl/unx/headless; PspSalInfoPrinter and PspSalPrinter.
> As suggested by Caolàn, the attached patch removes these two classes
> from vcl/unx/headless
>
> - The following removed
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:06:55AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> And PKG_CONFIG is supposed to be broken compared to this ? ;-) I just
> read the >100 lines of qt / kde checking in configure.in and was nearly
> ill ;-) And to think that almost all of this could all be evaporated
> trivially b
Hi Rene,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 02:51 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I wonder what the rationale for the intrusive "help packages"
> change between rc1 and rc2 is.
Weeell - it was promised for RC2; and as such, I feel we ought to
deliver - although it is delaying RC2, which has some nice w
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 10:23 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Please someone review and sign-off for libreoffice-3-3 (probably we should
> check for the function and not for the version, but anyways ;)):
And PKG_CONFIG is supposed to be broken compared to this ? ;-) I just
read the >100 line
Sorry for not including the list in my reply last night.
As this list behaves differently to all the other OOo / LibO mailing
lists I've been subscribed, I didn't use "reply all", but "reply", so my
mail has only been sent to Thorsten...
--- original mail ---
Hi Yi Fan, Thorsten, all,
thanks
Hi Alex, :-)
A big thanks for that. ;-)
David Nelson
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi there,
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 08:52 -0800, sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
> Hi. I am usually immune to conspiracy theories, but have we thought
> about becoming an OIN Licensee ?
In a word; yes - watch this space ...
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:23:24AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:27:40AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:27:12AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:18:04PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > Hi
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 08:14 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello Norbert,
>
> I had done a ./g pull -r, I did this again 1 hour ago and I still got
> the same error. (and again, i did a rm -rf unxlng*)
In this specific case, here's what likely happened
a) configure.in and other .ins were chan
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 01:56 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> and to be extra-safe: do the above in a fresh shell. (I have had issue
> with environment variables getting fked-up)
Right - the clean shell is quite important here. Arguably we should
detect and fail in configure.in if you have
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:27:40AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:27:12AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:18:04PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I tried to compile LibreOffice
> > > 3.3.0.1
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:27:40AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:27:12AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:18:04PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I tried to compile LibreOffice
> > > 3.3.0.1
Hi, :-)
I'm currently working on the content of the upcoming libreoffice.org
website. Obviously, on the site, there are going to be detailed
installation instructions for our users.
I don't have a Macintosh, unfortunately, and I need detailed
instructions for installing LibreOffice on Mac, *also*
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:27:12AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:18:04PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I tried to compile LibreOffice
> > 3.3.0.1 on my Debian Lenny x86_64 5.0.6, gcc 4.3.2, glibc 2.7. It
> > failed at th
56 matches
Mail list logo
