Re: [Libreoffice] Error compilation in vcl module

2010-12-16 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello Norbert, > > I had done a ./g pull -r, I did this again 1 hour ago and I still got the > same error. (and again, i did a rm -rf unxlng*) > > In libs-gui, when i make git log, i've got : > - last commit  : > commit 64384c29136df68340bc3cc

Re: [Libreoffice] Error compilation in vcl module

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello Norbert, I had done a ./g pull -r, I did this again 1 hour ago and I still got the same error. (and again, i did a rm -rf unxlng*) In libs-gui, when i make git log, i've got : - last commit : commit 64384c29136df68340bc3cccd2bcf98360b7fb6d Author: Thomas Klausner Date: Thu Dec 16 22:

Re: [Libreoffice] Failed at slideshow(fpicker) with ‘class KFileDialog’ has no member named ‘setConfirmOverwrite’

2010-12-16 Thread David Tardon
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:18:04PM +0800, imacat wrote: > Dear all, > > Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I tried to compile LibreOffice > 3.3.0.1 on my Debian Lenny x86_64 5.0.6, gcc 4.3.2, glibc 2.7. It > failed at the "slideshow" module, and when I digged inside as suggested, > it complain

[Libreoffice] Failed at slideshow(fpicker) w ith ‘class KFileDialog’ has no member named ‘ setConfirmOverwrite’

2010-12-16 Thread imacat
-- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development internal build errors: ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/local/src/libr

Re: [Libreoffice] The download link still shows Beta?

2010-12-16 Thread Yifan Jiang
Thorsten, Thanks! I am sorry didn't aware there is a WWW component option, and overlooked the existing bug by searching with words in title :( Best wishes, Yifan On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:12:58PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Yi Fan Jiang wrote: > > The links here looks a bit strange with 'B

Re: [Libreoffice] The download link still shows Beta?

2010-12-16 Thread Yifan Jiang
Wow, thanks David, those look pretty ;-) Yifan On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:56:29AM +0800, David Nelson wrote: > Hi Yi Fan Jiang, :-) > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 00:37, Yi Fan Jiang wrote: > > To whom may concern, > > > > The links here looks a bit strange with 'Beta' while we have been in RC > >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHack: soffice accepts -help/-h/-? in presence of the unix quickstart

2010-12-16 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 12:44 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch is for EasyHack 3.7 [1]. > Although fixing the -help/-h/-? action in presence of the unix quickstarter, > it does not support --help yet. > I wonder whether soffice should accept the alternative syntax of long prefi

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHack: soffice accepts -help/-h/-? in presence of the unix quickstart

2010-12-16 Thread Takeshi Abe
Hi, The attached patch is for EasyHack 3.7 [1]. Although fixing the -help/-h/-? action in presence of the unix quickstarter, it does not support --help yet. I wonder whether soffice should accept the alternative syntax of long prefix "--" for not only 'help' but also all the rest of options or not

[Libreoffice] help packages and current libreoffice-3-3

2010-12-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, I wonder what the rationale for the intrusive "help packages" change between rc1 and rc2 is. Without any review apparently (no Signed-Off here). Didn't we have a strict policy for that in place for libreoffice-3-3? I can understand the desire of some people to not include the help in what th

[Libreoffice] Support info links still point to openoffice.org

2010-12-16 Thread plino
In the Windows Add/Remove list each program has a link "Click here for support information". Clicking on this link for LibreOffice RC1 displays the following window http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n2101694/Support.png (I know the image is too wide but that seems to be a problem with

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...

2010-12-16 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Thorsten, On 2010-12-15 at 20:51 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > Actually, I still might have the cvs -> git import I did 2-3 years back > > that tracked all the branches, and also marked the integration commits > > as merges; if there'd be more demand for that, I could try to resurrect > >

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...

2010-12-16 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Caolan, On 2010-12-15 at 20:20 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > Actually, I still might have the cvs -> git import I did 2-3 years back > > The source cvs repos are still around and online, right ?, > i.e. :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.services.openoffice.org:2401/cvs Yes, but for the import I n

Re: [Libreoffice] Error compilation in vcl module

2010-12-16 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Julien make sure you have pulled libs-gui:7758d868da6c4d6f489300bfb517ab3bb7a6dce9 Norbert On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > Here the error I get when I compile vcl (i removed unxlng but same result) : > Entering /home/serval/libreoffice-source/libo/vcl/unx/gtk/

[Libreoffice] Error compilation in vcl module

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, Here the error I get when I compile vcl (i removed unxlng but same result) : Entering /home/serval/libreoffice-source/libo/vcl/unx/gtk/gdi Entering /home/serval/libreoffice-source/libo/vcl/unx/source/fontmanager Compiling: vcl/unx/source/fontmanager/parseAFM.cxx g++ -fmessage-length=0 -

Re: [Libreoffice] Features list

2010-12-16 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-16 09:49, Sophie Gautier a écrit : Hi all, [sorry for the cross post, but I need you all on this] I've finished to complete the feature list [1] on the wiki that Marc did upload some time ago (Cor you get the same but not complete and not sorted). So, dear developers if you preferred

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Correct credits url to website conventions

2010-12-16 Thread Andras Timar
2010/12/16 Thorsten Behrens : > Hi, > > Florian mentions website conventions are that non-localized content > lives under www.libreoffice - attached trivial patch changes that > for the credits link, and would need -3-3 review. > You (or I) need to patch files in po/ folder, too. Best regards, An

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Correct credits url to website conventions

2010-12-16 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi, Florian mentions website conventions are that non-localized content lives under www.libreoffice - attached trivial patch changes that for the credits link, and would need -3-3 review. Thanks, -- Thorsten From 7a85ae06141ab1ec70a63928d593ac51314de33b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thorsten Be

[Libreoffice] [PATCH]: Remove commented code

2010-12-16 Thread Anders Jonsson
Two more large heaps of code. These have been commented out since 2004 and 2007 respectively. Anders Jonsson (LGPLv3+,MPL) 0001-Remove-blocks-of-commented-code.patch Description: application/mbox 0001-Remove-large-block-of-unused-code.patch Description: application/mbox __

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Jan, another thing, that I already mentioned sometime ago in one of my many many posts here :), it would be great if these multilang installers would offer the installer language option - e.g. when starting the installer first the selection of installation language would pop-up. The installer would

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Hi, Jan, 2010/12/16 Jan Holesovsky > > > We can easily show a suggestion to download a localized version of the > help on each and every page, if the language is not en_US. With your > help (the l10n team), this can be even shown in the native language of > the user, with a direct link to the do

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Martin, On 2010-12-16 at 17:58 +0100, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: > > This is the wikihelp that will be available only in en_US, HC2 will be > > available in all language has helppacks. What we call online help is a bit > > confusing as it was the help files available with the OOo/LO version. Let

Re: [Libreoffice] The download link still shows Beta?

2010-12-16 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Yi Fan Jiang wrote: > The links here looks a bit strange with 'Beta' while we have been in RC phase > for some while: > > http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/ > > The word seems embedded in the picture...(from css) > Hi Yifan, yep, good catch, this was reported as https://bugs.freedeskt

Re: [Libreoffice] The download link still shows Beta?

2010-12-16 Thread David Nelson
Hi Yi Fan Jiang, :-) On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 00:37, Yi Fan Jiang wrote: > To whom may concern, > > The links here looks a bit strange with 'Beta' while we have been in RC > phase for some while: > > http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/ The content on those pages is out of date. We're near

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2010-12-16 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote: > > -- > > - start unit test #1 on library ../../unxbsdx3.pro/lib/libqa_unit.so > > -- > > So - I would cut/paste the command-line; export the LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
2010/12/16 Sophie Gautier > > This is the wikihelp that will be available only in en_US, HC2 will be > available in all language has helppacks. What we call online help is a bit > confusing as it was the help files available with the OOo/LO version. Lets > speak about HC2 for the local files and

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Bug 31865 depends on bug 32338, which changed state. Bug 32338 Summary: [WIKIHELP]: Missing context sensitive Help https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32338 What|Old Value |New Value

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Martin, On 16/12/2010 19:40, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Jan, 2010/12/16 Jan Holesovsky mailto:ke...@suse.cz>> Only one problem I can think of is the time; I am not sure if I can get that 100% before the final release, so - it might happen that the wikihelp will be English only at

[Libreoffice] Becoming an OIN licensee?

2010-12-16 Thread sebastian
Hi. I am usually immune to conspiracy theories, but have we thought about becoming an OIN Licensee? If we do it before the Novell sale, we get a permanent license for the Novell-Donated patents (and others) as reported on groklaw. If you check the latest lwn.net news entry, it seems the patents wil

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Martin, On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:40 +0100, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: > I think online help must be available in all languages - it is a > stopper, if it isn't. I agree. On the other hand - if there are bugs in the web help we can improve the conversion continually to fix them without ha

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Jan, 2010/12/16 Jan Holesovsky > > Only one problem I can think of is the time; I am not sure if I can get > that 100% before the final release, so - it might happen that the > wikihelp will be English only at the time of 3.3 final, but filed with > the translated versions as soon as the above w

[Libreoffice] The download link still shows Beta?

2010-12-16 Thread Yi Fan Jiang
To whom may concern, The links here looks a bit strange with 'Beta' while we have been in RC phase for some while: http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/ The word seems embedded in the picture...(from css) background: url(/img/controls/ControlElement_Button_Download_Orange_Li

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2010-12-16 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Thomas, On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:57 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > The build on NetBSD currently fails with: > Entering /disk/2/archive/libreoffice/sc/qa/unit This is where we run our unit testing framework, which involves the first real(ish) run of great chunks of the code. > --

Re: [Libreoffice] Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Kendy, all, On 16/12/2010 16:44, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-16 at 07:38 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: I've two questions concerning the wikihelp/HC2, there is no emergency for the answer, I know you're busy, but I don't want to forget to ask ;) We are all busy, I am sure;

Re: [Libreoffice] Features list

2010-12-16 Thread David Nelson
Hi Sophie, :-) Thanks for that, I will include them on the site ASAP. ;-) David Nelson ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] need review for 3-3: better build identification in the about dialog

2010-12-16 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:51 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > could anyone review that attached diff, so we could add it for > libreoffice-3-3? Looks fine to me; and v. low risk. > Both changes were requested, discussed, and approved in the thread > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreo

[Libreoffice] Features list

2010-12-16 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi all, [sorry for the cross post, but I need you all on this] I've finished to complete the feature list [1] on the wiki that Marc did upload some time ago (Cor you get the same but not complete and not sorted). So, dear developers if you preferred feature is not there, add it to the page or

Re: [Libreoffice] Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:44 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > - the pootle tranlations will be applied over the English version > - but if a language team decides that they want to translate > directly in the wikihelp, their language version will be open for > editing directly in the wikihelp To m

[Libreoffice] need review for 3-3: better build identification in the about dialog

2010-12-16 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, could anyone review that attached diff, so we could add it for libreoffice-3-3? It has two effects: + we will show the "tag libreoffice-3.3.0.2" in the about dialog instead of "libreoffice-build-3.3.0.2" + we will use the tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.2" instead of

Re: [Libreoffice] Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-16 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-16 at 07:38 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > I've two questions concerning the wikihelp/HC2, there is no emergency > for the answer, I know you're busy, but I don't want to forget to ask ;) We are all busy, I am sure; thank you for the explicit CC:, it is then much easier to

Re: [Libreoffice] Base - sqlite - licence grief

2010-12-16 Thread Wols Lists
On 16/12/10 09:58, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Wols, > > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 01:18 +, Wols Lists wrote: >> I'm hoping to get time to plough on, but family and christmas are >> getting in the way. Chat off-list if you like and we'll see how far we >> get :-) > Perhaps the best thing to do

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 --- Comment #40 from Rainer Bielefeld 2010-12-16 04:13:27 PST --- Nominating Bug 30571 - Dragging some toolbars on the left side makes them unusable. That's not totally compatible with our blocker definition, but imho too visible to leave it as

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Michael Meeks changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||32435 -- Configure bugmail: https://bug

[Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2010-12-16 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I've switched back to the internal odbc library, since the external one gave me the BOOL errors. Strangely, "--with-system-odbc-headers=no" gives me an error by the configure script because it's not recognized, but it makes the configure script switch to the internal headers. Sebastian, want

Re: [Libreoffice] Now with extra cppcheck FRESHNESS

2010-12-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 16:25 -0800, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote: > On 12/14/10 12:13, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ is running cppcheck 1.46. Cool, https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cppcheck/ticket/2279 is fixed however, https://so

Re: [Libreoffice] Python API and Danny.O00

2010-12-16 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Peter Morgan wrote: > import LibreOffice as LO > > spread_full_path = "/jobs/%s/my_calc_spread_sheet.odf" % JOB.job_id # > whatever extension > > spreadMe = LO.open(spread_full_path) > > mySheet = spreadMe.sheet("foo", create=True) # create's if not exist, > otherwise error > > mySheet.append(

Re: [Libreoffice] Help?

2010-12-16 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi Jerry, Jerry Shi píše v St 15. 12. 2010 v 20:57 -0500: > Alright, thanks for the reply. So, I tried to install the > dependencies, but I ran into some problems. There were requests all > over the place to change the architecture for lots of software from > x86-64 to normal. should I go throu

Re: [Libreoffice] remove outputdir in build failure text ?

2010-12-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 10:11 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > I wonder if we should add an rm -Rf to the shell we > recommend pasting to continue the build when it fails ;-) perhaps this > would help people overcome these issues more easily - thoughts ? Sure, can't hurt. Though we are now try

[Libreoffice] remove outputdir in build failure text ?

2010-12-16 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 02:09 +0800, imacat wrote: > surensp...@gmail.com said: > >> I'm pretty sure Michael has already fixed this yesterday. So, please > >> update your build tree and see if you can go past that. > > I think the above has fixed my issue, though I still failed to build > LO.

Re: [Libreoffice] Base - sqlite - licence grief

2010-12-16 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Wols, On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 01:18 +, Wols Lists wrote: > I'm hoping to get time to plough on, but family and christmas are > getting in the way. Chat off-list if you like and we'll see how far we > get :-) Perhaps the best thing to do is to create a feature branch, and push it ther

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH]: Remove large unused code block

2010-12-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 18:24 +0100, Anders Jonsson wrote: > This is the largest sample of unused code that I could find anywhere. It > has been commented out since its introduction in 2007. Fair enough, pushed. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailin

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] sw: reset num level on SplitNode if parent is outline.

2010-12-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 08:03 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > There is another section of the file that uses a similar code. > > I'm not sure if I should also apply it there too: > source/core/txtnode/ndtxt.cxx, SwTxtNode::AppendNode Hmm, not sure either. Given the similarity of the two resets, it

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] sw: reset num level on SplitNode if parent is outline.

2010-12-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 23:16 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:59:37 -0800, Octavio Alvarez > wrote: > > > Fixes the following scenario: > > 1. Create a paragraph style "S" bound to a list style. > > 2. Set the Heading 2 next style to "S". > > 3. Pressing ENTER at the end of

Re: [Libreoffice] pdf import extention

2010-12-16 Thread Lior Kaplan
Hi Thorsten, As we have a second opinion on this, could you please do the commit ? Would be nice to also have it in the 3.3 branch. Thanks Kaplan On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Thorsten, > > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 12:57 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > Lior Kaplan

Re: [Libreoffice] Thoughts on releasing ...

2010-12-16 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Michael, all, Michael Meeks wrote (13-12-10 15:05) On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote: So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process would be that no explicit approval is needed for localized versions. Right. I do not believe we can afford to hand ou