Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Niko Rönkkö
Hi all! On 25.10.2010 01:55, Christian Lohmaier wrote: I personally disagree that an alphabetically sortet list is best. e.g. now the font inclusion options wrt dejavu and liberation fonts are spread apart, build tool options are interspread the feature/code switches, extension-switches are mixe

Re: [Libreoffice] howto for getting non-trivial cppunit tests up and running

2010-10-26 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Caolan McNamara wrote: > Righteo, re-enabled again and lets have another go. Right away I see it > detected a new bug introduced with the vos removalstuff, which I've now > fixed :-). Tests are good. > Hi Caolan, sorry - breaks for me on at least two platforms consistently. Error log snippet: rm

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: I must get used to that this list doesn't set reply to list... Oh brother, I hear you. I personally prefer that a list gets all traffic, end of discussion. However, it was pointed out to me about 6 months ago that I'm the losing

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: > At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> >> I personally disagree that an alphabetically sortet list is best. >> e.g. now the font inclusion options wrt dejavu and liberation fonts >> are spread apart, build tool options

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: I personally disagree that an alphabetically sortet list is best. e.g. now the font inclusion options wrt dejavu and liberation fonts are spread apart, build tool options are interspread the feature/code switches, extension-switches are

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Niko, *, I must get used to that this list doesn't set reply to list... On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Niko Rönkkö wrote: > Licenced under MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ of course. > > Cleaning and organizing of configure.in: > > Make configure --help be more coherent, limit it's width to 80

Re: [Libreoffice] Tar / Zip wobbly

2010-10-26 Thread Wols Lists
On 26/10/10 21:15, Wols Lists wrote: > I'll investigate :-) but I've just tried a clean download and it's blown > up on me... > > checking for required Perl modules... Can't locate Archive/Zip.pm in > @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.12.2/x86_64-linux > /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5

Re: [Libreoffice] Image Compression Patch

2010-10-26 Thread Andrew C. E. Dent
Hi Kendy Thanks again for checking so deeply.Sorry, I should have been clearer on these images...These are the green (/red) crosses that have long existed as icon placeholders.For some time in the 'Classic' theme I have used a minimal png file (67bytes - 1pixel) to replace them.They probably ar

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Moved wrappers for all debuginfo calls into the function itself

2010-10-26 Thread Sean McMurray
This patch is public domain. From 8f7ac6749fce3ba0c16d528d6fd65157ee3318c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:36:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Moved the debuginfo wrappers into the call itself. Also condensed the getparameters code. --- solenv/bin/modules/installer/archivefiles.pm |

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Fix for installer::languages::shorten_language_string()

2010-10-26 Thread Sean McMurray
This patch is public domain. From bb46cc9b0af522ea5764995f0a1f0c3d98c0a3b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:01:32 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Bug fix for installer::languages::shorten_language_string() Added the missing : to installer:languages::shorten_language_string() call in sys

Re: [Libreoffice] Bug when compiling unoguard.obj

2010-10-26 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:29 PM, julien wrote: > Hello, > > Here what i get : > Compiling: sc/source/ui/unoobj/detreg.cxx > Making:    unoobj.lib > Compiling: sc/source/ui/unoobj/unoguard.cxx > /home/serval/libreoffice-source/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/sc/source/ui/unoobj/unoguard.cxx: > In

Re: [Libreoffice] Tar / Zip wobbly

2010-10-26 Thread Wols Lists
On 26/10/10 21:31, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Wols Lists wrote: >> I'll investigate :-) but I've just tried a clean download and it's blown >> up on me... >> >> checking for required Perl modules... Can't locate Archive/Zip.pm in >> [...] >> Bearing in mind I've

Re: [Libreoffice] Tar / Zip wobbly

2010-10-26 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > I'll investigate :-) but I've just tried a clean download and it's blown > up on me... > > checking for required Perl modules... Can't locate Archive/Zip.pm in > [...] > Bearing in mind I've got Tar.pm (and Extract.pm) and am on gentoo, it > lo

[Libreoffice] Bug when compiling unoguard.obj

2010-10-26 Thread julien
Hello, Here what i get : Compiling: sc/source/ui/unoobj/detreg.cxx Making:unoobj.lib Compiling: sc/source/ui/unoobj/unoguard.cxx /home/serval/libreoffice-source/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/sc/source/ui/unoobj/unoguard.cxx: In constructor 'ScUnoGuard::ScUnoGuard()': /home/serval/libreoff

[Libreoffice] Tar / Zip wobbly

2010-10-26 Thread Wols Lists
I'll investigate :-) but I've just tried a clean download and it's blown up on me... checking for required Perl modules... Can't locate Archive/Zip.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.12.2/x86_64-linux /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.12.2 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.12.2/x86_64

Re: [Libreoffice] the basic macro editor

2010-10-26 Thread René Kjellerup
Very understandable then, I've had build issues since the 17th... and no real time to look into it. I apologize for having brought it up so late. Nice to see it has been solved. Thanks On Oct 26, 2010 9:26 PM, "Noel Power" wrote: > On 25/10/10 16:49, René Kjellerup wrote: >> finally had time (alt

Re: [Libreoffice] the basic macro editor

2010-10-26 Thread Noel Power
On 25/10/10 16:49, René Kjellerup wrote: finally had time (although not to complete another build) to run the test again, the procedure I did was: Tools->Macros->Organize macros->basic select Main and click on the Edit button I've attached the back-trace of the crash René That stack looks *ex

Re: [Libreoffice] First build error: segmentation fault on vcl

2010-10-26 Thread Dave Lacy Kusters
On Tue, October 26, 2010 12:30:43 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:41 -0700, Dave Lacy Kusters wrote: > > I hit an error on my first compile that I haven't seen discussed in the >archive > > > or elsewhere online. > > See this thread: > http://www.mail-archive.com/libreof

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHack: Fixes for shadows member declarations and inits

2010-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 2:48pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, John Lee Castle wrote: [much appreciated work and summary] Educational moment: Emails are not threaded merely by subject, but by an internal header that reads something like this Message-ID: <1288118915666-1775907.p...@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4f9441cbb

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHack: Fixes for shadows member declarations and inits

2010-10-26 Thread LeMoyne
Some work to reduce the compiler warnings in binfilter. Patch is almost entirely comprised of fixes of initializers and the warning: parameter '' shadows a member of 'this'. Also few formats, del of extraneous comments and unshadowing of local variables. Generally worked down from the start of a

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problem on windows 7

2010-10-26 Thread Martin Gallwey
> Sorry, nope. For me that has always worked fine, Cygwin has never mistaken me > to be superuser if I use my normally powered Windows account. > > What does your /etc/passwd and /etc/group files look like? My entry in /etc/passwd is: Martin:unused_by_nt/2000/xp:1004:513:U-ATOMISER\Martin,S-1-5-

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] Easy Task - systray build progress tracker

2010-10-26 Thread Luke Dixon
Hello Michael, > > Heh; I guess default_icons/ should have a bus-load of artwork in it. I've looked there, I can't really see one that really does it. Maybe the default icon is good enough. > Wonderful - thanks; merged it now - I added the 'sleep' inside > zenity_close - to avoid it

Re: [Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi David, On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 17:17 +0200, "David Schröder" wrote: > Your list isn't correct. It shows only the contributors since Since week 38 ;-) ? :-) True - we should fix that - I guess it is perhaps good to have a separate section for Oracle contribution at the end. > What about

Re: [Libreoffice] yum-builddep question ...

2010-10-26 Thread Terrell Prude' Jr.
Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:32 -0400, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: Michael Meeks wrote: Glad to test, but a little tip would help. My other boxes, including the one I'm on now, are all running CentOS 5, and the "yum-build

Re: [Libreoffice] Image Compression Patch

2010-10-26 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Andrew, On 2010-10-26 at 06:40 +0100, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote: > I have checked the optimized icons several ways and as much as > possible, but ultimately it is only through use we can catch any small > oddities. I suggest we push the new icons upstream and await user > feedback. I have pushe

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] Building on windows 7-64bit with Visual Studio 2010 Express

2010-10-26 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Great to see some 64bit windows compiling going on :-) Umm, he is running on a 64-bit OS, but producing 32-bit code as usual... (I have also been running a 64-bit Windows for quite some time on my development machine.) That the OS is 64-bit doesn't really show up any way in the LibreOffice b

Re: [Libreoffice] Turkish translation mailing list

2010-10-26 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, Caolán McNamara wrote on 2010-10-25 22.34: cmc->florian: Is there a procedure written anywhere as to who to contact re local mailing lists ? during one of the last calls we agreed on setting up all native-lang mailing lists and then see who will be a moderator afterwards. I'm working on

Re: [Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, Michael Meeks wrote on 2010-10-26 14.02: The current Help menu->about->credits points to http://libreoffice.org/credits.html That is bad :-) which gives you a 403 Access forbidden when accessing. We shouldn't keep our list of contributors that secret :-). Exactly ! o

Re: [Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread Drew Jensen
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 15:39 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:50:06 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > > I'ld love to have at least the wiki authors in before making the > > official page live. > Done: http://sspaeth.de/uploads/tmp/index.html :-) > > No clue how to do a mapping

Re: [Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread David Schröder
  Hm,   I'm a newcomer and at this point of state I can't real help. (I will be a helper for correct spelling German)   But let me point out an important issue:   Sebastian, Your list isn't correct. It shows only the contributors since the - harding to say - fork.   What about all the contributors

Re: [Libreoffice] javac problem when build libreoffice on opensuse

2010-10-26 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:56:11PM +0800, ?? wrote: > i have javac in /usr/bin > but i get a problem when build libreoffice in opensuse follow > thehttp://www.documentfoundation.org/develop/ on the make command: > > checking whether to add custom build version... yes, libreoffice-build >

Re: [Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 01:50:06PM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > I'ld prefer without the graphs as it's only a credits page. Miklos > pointed to a nice script for git live stats, but I can't remember it. IIRC I mentioned this: http://mirror.celinuxforum.org/gitstat/ And I added that the cod

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Building on windows 7-64bit with Visual Studio 2010 Express

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Martin, On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 13:14 +0100, Martin Gallwey wrote: > > Sorry, better patch attached - is this the right list for this kind of > > thing? > > Now that I've actually read the appropriate wiki page about how to Thanks for the patch, just pushed it (or at least the version

Re: [Libreoffice] "damaged" file: sysui's dummy/localize.sdf

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kevin, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:59 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > Does distclean not remove the ccache files? Both times, I ran 'make > distclean, bin/g pull -r, ...' No it does not remove them; this is because ccache is thought to be 100% 'safe' - ie. if the flags, compiler version, p

Re: [Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:50:06 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > I'ld love to have at least the wiki authors in before making the > official page live. Done: http://sspaeth.de/uploads/tmp/index.html :-) No clue how to do a mapping to get nicer names from the Wiki user names. Also the wiki stats are l

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on windows 7-64bit with Visual Studio 2010 Express

2010-10-26 Thread Martin Gallwey
> Sorry, better patch attached - is this the right list for this kind of thing? Now that I've actually read the appropriate wiki page about how to submit patches using git, please find attached my third attempt at a patch! Apologies for the spam. Martin 0001-30989-Fix-testing-for-pkg-config.pa

[Libreoffice] javac problem when build libreoffice on opensuse

2010-10-26 Thread 李明致
i have javac in /usr/bin but i get a problem when build libreoffice in opensuse follow thehttp://www.documentfoundation.org/develop/ on the make command: checking whether to add custom build version... yes, libreoffice-build 3.2.99.2 checking whether to build with Java support... yes checking t

Re: [Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Sebastian, On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:41 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > The current Help menu->about->credits points to > http://libreoffice.org/credits.html That is bad :-) > which gives you a 403 Access forbidden when accessing. We shouldn't keep > our list of contributors that secr

Re: [Libreoffice] vos removal is now merged in master

2010-10-26 Thread Andras Timar
> release [ we will be feature freezing on Friday ]. For historical > reasons, we have a BrOffice brand in the LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 locale - and > we adapt our splash for that now. It would be great if we could also > isolate and tweak our %PRODUCTNAME key for these locales too. %PRODUCTNAME is the mo

Re: [Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Sebastian, On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:41 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > Please put something like this in its place: > http://sspaeth.de/uploads/tmp/index.html I'ld love to have at least the wiki authors in before making the official page live. > (with or without graphs). I'ld prefer without

Re: [Libreoffice] howto for getting non-trivial cppunit tests up and running

2010-10-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 21:58 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 20:44 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > > So the sc test, while working reliably for me, is apparently not > > working for Kohei and others > > So, I came home and did a clean re-build of the latest source tree on

Re: [Libreoffice] vos removal is now merged in master

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Norbert, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 21:40 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > After a heroic review by kendy, the vos-removal branch has been merged > into master and is being pushed as I type :-) Congratulations ! great work. > - there are a bunch of xml file related to uno service descripti

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on windows 7-64bit with Visual Studio 2010 Express

2010-10-26 Thread Martin Gallwey
On 26 October 2010 11:54, Martin Gallwey wrote: >> 3) If pkg-config is not installed, PKG_CHECK_MODULES is not defined >> and autogen.sh fails with the message: >> >> ./configure: line 3598: syntax error near unexpected token `MINIMUM_REQS,' >> ./configure: line 3598: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES( MINIMUM_R

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on windows 7-64bit with Visual Studio 2010 Express

2010-10-26 Thread Martin Gallwey
> 3) If pkg-config is not installed, PKG_CHECK_MODULES is not defined > and autogen.sh fails with the message: > > ./configure: line 3598: syntax error near unexpected token `MINIMUM_REQS,' > ./configure: line 3598: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES( MINIMUM_REQS,' > > Rather than something more useful like 'Plea

[Libreoffice] rtl_uString/rtl::OUString and osl_getCommandArg

2010-10-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
FWIW rtl_uString * pFoo; osl_getCommandArg(0, &pFoo); is a bit unsafe, this should at least be... rtl_uString * pFoo = 0; osl_getCommandArg(0, &pFoo); But note that you have to call rtl_uString_release on that pFoo at some stage or its a memleak. Far easier altogether when in c++ code is to us

Re: [Libreoffice] Where should I edit the code? in clone or build directory?

2010-10-26 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi, On 2010-10-25 at 13:34 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > > Currently I edit the code in the clone dir and then use meld to copy > > > the changes to build/libreoffice* > > Heh :-) I do something like that too. Just be aware that running 'make' > will overwrite that stuff. > > The

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Easy Task - systray build progress tracker

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Luke, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 23:21 +0100, Luke Dixon wrote: > I thought I would try one of the easy tasks and the zenity systray one > seemed the most fun for me to look at. After getting it working I > figured I needed to also add it to the configure system Cool :-) you did indeed get

[Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
The current Help menu->about->credits points to http://libreoffice.org/credits.html which gives you a 403 Access forbidden when accessing. We shouldn't keep our list of contributors that secret :-). Please put something like this in its place: http://sspaeth.de/uploads/tmp/index.html (with or wi

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest segfault

2010-10-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:39 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> I have a segfault running smoketest. > > > > Its cold comfort, but smoketest works for me ok. > > can you post t

Re: [Libreoffice] vos removal is now merged in master

2010-10-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 21:40 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Linux x86_64 has been build mutiple times... smoketested and manually > tested. the smoketest used to work fine in the branch itself. but the > same smoketest quit working on master before the merge (and still is > not working after the m

Re: [Libreoffice] run tinderbox script in an English locale

2010-10-26 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Caolan, all, On 2010-10-26 at 08:42 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > Any chance we could tweak the tinderbox build to run under > export LANG="C" or en_US or something. Getting build errors in Czech is > a bit tricky for me. Sorry for that - fixed & restarted now :-) Regards, Kendy _

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problem on windows 7

2010-10-26 Thread Tor Lillqvist
>>> I was going to patch it to do a 'tar --same-owner' instead, >> Hmm, you mean --no-same-owner? > Same thing, no? No. If you are (or Cygwin *thinks* you are) root (have uid=0), tar will chown files after extraction unless you specified --no-same-owner. If you aren't root, tar will chown if y

[Libreoffice] run tinderbox script in an English locale

2010-10-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
Any chance we could tweak the tinderbox build to run under export LANG="C" or en_US or something. Getting build errors in Czech is a bit tricky for me. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma

Re: [Libreoffice] yum-builddep question ...

2010-10-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:32 -0400, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: > Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: > > Michael Meeks wrote: > >> > >>> Glad to test, but a little tip would help. My other boxes, > >>> including the one I'm on now, are all running CentOS 5, and the > >>> "yum-builddep openoffice.org" comm

Re: [Libreoffice] First build error: segmentation fault on vcl

2010-10-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:41 -0700, Dave Lacy Kusters wrote: > I hit an error on my first compile that I haven't seen discussed in the > archive > or elsewhere online. See this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org/msg00219.html I don't know why exactly this is ha

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] tiny first patch - fix 32 bit overflow at compile

2010-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 3:12am -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:44 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: For a project as large as LibreOffice, you may also more appreciate the use of an IDE (Integrated Development Environment). Eclipse is often touted to me, as is Geany, and KDevelop.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] tiny first patch - fix 32 bit overflow at compile

2010-10-26 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Kevin, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:44 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > For a project as large as LibreOffice, you may also more appreciate the > use of an IDE (Integrated Development Environment). Eclipse is often > touted to me, as is Geany, and KDevelop. Did you ever tried loading the sw module