Hi all,
this is a resubmitting, because I think the other patch (lurking here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2010-October/001329.html,
please ignore it) went unnoticed 'cause I forgot to tag it as a [PATCH]
and 'cause from the dev I cc'ed there I got an autoanswer stating that
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Mattias Johnsson
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Two (probably idiotic) questions. First, when I refresh my master branch with
>
> ~/loroot $ ga pull -r
>
> and then make via
>
> ~/loroot/rawbuild $ ./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=5 --without-junit
> --disable-kde
> ~/loroot
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Santiago Bosio
wrote:
> El 21/10/10 21:11, Norbert Thiebaud escribió:
>>
>> ...
>
>> git checkout -b vos origin/feature/vos-removal&& ./bin/g checkout -b
>> vos origin/feature/vos-removal
>>
>
> I'm trying to build on Fedora 13 (32bit).
Thanks..
> It's still g
Hello all,
Two (probably idiotic) questions. First, when I refresh my master branch with
~/loroot $ ga pull -r
and then make via
~/loroot/rawbuild $ ./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=5 --without-junit --disable-kde
~/loroot/rawbuild $ make
it seems that everything is rebuilt which takes hours, even
I guess you did emerge rpm
I had a problem with rpm, where the current 'stable' rpm (4.4.6-r7) in
portage would segfault... I unmask th ~amd64 and got the 4.8.1
ebuild... that would pass the point where rpm segfault.. but then
failed later on yet unknown reasons.
I removed /var/lib/rpm, emerg
On 23/10/10 00:55, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
>> On 22/10/10 01:11, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've pushed an updated version of the feature/vos-removal branch
>>>
>>> At this point vos is no more, and I build and 'smoketest' success
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 22/10/10 01:11, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've pushed an updated version of the feature/vos-removal branch
>>
>> At this point vos is no more, and I build and 'smoketest' successfully
>> in rawbuild on Linux x86_64
>>
>> I'm looki
On 22/10/10 01:11, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've pushed an updated version of the feature/vos-removal branch
>
> At this point vos is no more, and I build and 'smoketest' successfully
> in rawbuild on Linux x86_64
>
> I'm looking for volonteer to build it and to basic test on it on other
With thanks to Rene Kjellerup ... your pointer was spot on.
This patch (in the top level build dir) makes the development system
compile with KDE4 switched on and KDE3 switched off.
How do I update the develop page on the web? There's a bunch of useful
stuff I'd like to document to make life eas
License terms regarding MSVS redistributable components are specified somewhere
in the Visual Studio installation directory.
IIRC, you can freely redistribute any of them with your application as long as
you don't modify them in any way. I'll be able to say more precisely and/or
quote the relat
> is there some redistribution licensing foo going on here?
As far as I know the intent is that they are redistributed with an application
that needs them (i.e. one built with Microsoft's toolchain), and it might well
be that you are not allowed to redistribute them by themselves. Have your lega
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 06:42 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote:
> remove pam in writer sw
Thorsten applied this one I see, always good to remove includes of
headers which aren't necessary to compile.
Though just in case there's any confusion, pam.hxx in writer is the
header for the "Point and Mark" class,
Ubuntu 10.10 here.
Entering /media/libreoffice/rawbuild/comphelper/util
Making:libcomphelp4gcc3.so
../unxlngx6.pro/slo/regpathhelper.o: In function
`comphelper::getPathToSystemRegistry()':
regpathhelper.cxx:(.text+0x82): undefined reference to
`vos::OStartupInfo::OStartupInfo()'
regpathhel
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 11:22 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Removed lots of code that was supposed to do scrolling in the about dialog.
But the scolling in the about dialog is one of those cunning neato sort
of easter egg things.
Go to the about box and hold CTRL and type sdt. I'd be sad to loos
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 15:03 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> error (CannotRegisterImplementationException): loading component library
> failed: ./pythonloader.uno.so
> dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxbsdx3.pro/lib/pyuno_services.rdb'
>
> I don't know what it's doing here or why it fa
At 8:08am -0400 Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Thomas Klausner wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:16:32PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
I'll switch diagnose.h (locally) to give " " for OSL_THIS_FUNC, as it
currently seems to do for everyone else.
To close this thread: I've pushed this change.
Have you enu
Comments follow
Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
Hi all,
it seems that the Debian packaging in the universal is somehow broken in
instsetoo_native.
The URE package name seems wrong.
The log is as follow:
...
Calculating Installed-Size...
Building Debian binary distribution...
Packaging failed!
Try
Hi!
My latest build failure is:
Entering
/disk/2/archive/libreoffice/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/pyuno/source/loader
Making:all_pythonloader.uno.dpslo
Compiling: pyuno/unxbsdx3.pro/misc/pythonloader.uno_version.c
Compiling: pyuno/source/loader/pyuno_loader.cxx
Making:pythonloader.uno.lib
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:16:32PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> I'll switch diagnose.h (locally) to give " " for OSL_THIS_FUNC, as it
> currently seems to do for everyone else.
To close this thread: I've pushed this change.
Thomas
___
LibreOffice mai
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:36:19AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> Completely untested but:
>
> in BDriver.cxx, move
> #include "odbc/OFunction.hh" and odbc/OTools.hxx to the end of the
> include list, and just before them add #undef BOOL. see if that help
> (the more permanent solution is to con
Hi all,
it seems that the Debian packaging in the universal is somehow broken in
instsetoo_native.
The URE package name seems wrong.
The log is as follow:
...
Calculating Installed-Size...
Building Debian binary distribution...
Packaging failed!
Try 2 : Could not execute
"LD_PRELOAD=/home/bep
Hi Kendy
I've finished the process of lossless optimization for the default_images
pack.The archive is available
here:http://people.bath.ac.uk/ea2aced/OOo/default_images.zip
I also raised a corresponding issue over at OOo to give them a chance to get
this upstream if they
wish...http://qa.open
Removed lots of code that was supposed to do scrolling in the about dialog.
And removed unused includes and variables too.
Also don't squeeze the Copyright text in a too small multiline edit.
Compiled and run: looks a bit nicer than before and less code too.
There are still a few commented out lin
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 01:55 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Here are 3 minor patches against calc/sc/source/core/data/attarray.cxx.
With a bit of massaging I got these to apply.
I removed the bits that remove the vim modelines at the end of the
document. Those are new and part of the attempt to make
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:02:45PM -0300, Júlio Hoffimann
wrote:
> There is a place where i can make a connection between my user-experience
> and LibreOffice's C++ classes?
>
> I know this link generated by Doxygen, http://docs.go-oo.org/, but would be
> helpful an user point of view to get fam
25 matches
Mail list logo
