At 1:55am -0400 Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote:
As this weak coder starts out on a trek to help out, here are 3
minor patches against calc/sc/source/core/data/attarray.cxx. I tried
to keep them separated logically, but wasn't quite perfect about it.
$ pwd
[...]/clone/calc
$ git log -3 -p
Hi Jon,
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 04:11 +0200, Jon Nordby wrote:
> Does LibreOffice ship an ODF thumbnail implementation for
> file-managers on Windows and Mac OSX? If so, where in the sources can
> I find it? If not, can anyone point me to other implementations?
Not that I know of though we
Hi Rajesh,
First - great to see you again ! and thanks for getting involved with
LibreOffice. I believe Cedric was looking into this issue and probably
is the best guy to own it, nevertheless let me trample all over his turf
- since he's not replied yet (AFAICS) :-)
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at
Hi there,
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 11:29 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> these patches removes the elementsof macro, defined in
> , and replaces it with the SAL_N_ELEMENTS
> macro, defined in
I -think- that we merged these as part of a subsequent patch from you ?
at least, they seem fixed :-
Hi there,
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 17:57 +0300, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
> > Much as I hate to say it (being English), we should use the US
> > spellings consistently where possible :-)
>
> OK, here is the remaining part of that patch that changed spelling.
Thanks :-) pushed,
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 23:40 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> I tried untarring the SampleIcc distfile and then just applying
> clone/libs-extern/icc/SampleICC-1.3.2.patch on top of it using patch
> -p2 inside the directory, as a first step so that I could change it
> and generate a new p
2010/10/18 Caolán McNamara :
> Looks good, the good news is that the vast majority are in the third
> party modules, e.g. mozilla, lpsolve, berkleydb. I was able to fix a few
> that belonged to us, e.g. soltools, sal etc. Though there's still a good
> few remaining.
I think this is because only C
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Bircher Florian wrote:
> some build breakers
Pushed, Thanks Florian.
Norbert
>
> #include has now #include
> (commit from shm_get)
>
> todo:
> so a next step would be remove all #include where already
> is a #include
>
>
> commint under lgpl v3
>
>
>
> ___
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Everything except the 'filters' patch has been either pushed, or sent
> to the component maintainer for review.
>
libs-gui parts (basebmp & basegfx) just pushed. Kept a few useful
bits in the */test, */workben subdirs, those are often playgrounds /
staging areas for co
some build breakers
#include has now #include
(commit from shm_get)
todo:
so a next step would be remove all #include where already
is a #include
commint under lgpl v3
diff --git a/desktop/win32/source/guistdio/guistdio.inc
b/desktop/win32/source/guistdio/guistdio.inc
index 7009b24..05
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Anthony Youngman
wrote:
> Just tried to build libreoffice on gentoo. All the pre-requisites
> should be there, given that I've done an "emerge openoffice". But it
> falls over ...
>
> checking for Qt headers... no
> configure: error: Qt headers not found. Please
I've build on gentle, I had to disable kde to do so "--enable-kde=no
--enable-kde4=no --without-junit"
The Bests
René
On Oct 19, 2010 12:29 AM, "Anthony Youngman"
wrote:
> Just tried to build libreoffice on gentoo. All the pre-requisites
> should be there, given that I've done an "emerge openoffi
Just tried to build libreoffice on gentoo. All the pre-requisites
should be there, given that I've done an "emerge openoffice". But it
falls over ...
checking for Qt headers... no
configure: error: Qt headers not found. Please specify the root of
your Qt installation by exporting QTDIR before ru
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:45:56PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> We have to edit the patch; icc is one of our 'external' components, so
> we have the pristine source archive, and then patch it with our internal
> patch as part of the build.
>
> So - we would need to alter the patch. Th
Hello,
Can you also create a mailing list[1] for Turkish LibreOffice
translations?
Thanks.
[1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists
--
Gökcen Eraslan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.free
Hi there,
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 13:50 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> this patch replaces all occurrences of sizeof.*/.*sizeof.*\[ with
> SAL_N_ELEMENTS in ure
Thanks - there were a few sillies in there:
#include
an ommitted include, and one other build-break I forgot ;-
Hi Michael, Thomas,
...
So - we would need to alter the patch. That leads to some diffs of
diffs problem, but ... hopefully there is some --with-system-icc variant
that could be used, if indeed the patches don't change its behaviour in
some unpleasant way.
That piece of software (icc
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 16:53 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Everything except the 'filters' patch has been either pushed,
> or sent
> to the component maintainer for review.
And I'm reviewing the calc part of your patch. At first glance there
are several hunks that I'd like to keep, but I'
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 17:43 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> One of the issues I see is in SampleICC, where Vetters.cpp includes
> on Solaris and on all other non-Windows.
riight - hmm.
> On NetBSD, it also needs to include errno.h to compile. I could add an
> #if NetBSD to t
Hi Norbert,
First of all - impressive, thanks a lot! Unfortunately, I wasn't able
to review your patches today, but tomorrow I am traveling, and I'll take
your branch as the 'reading on the bus' ;-) & come back to you.
On 2010-10-18 at 14:57 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > I wonder, is there a
> I was also interested in things like the UI string changes
> in binfilters - what was all that about ? :-)
That was certainly not intended. It seems my editor has screwed up as it
somehow didn't like some files. It couldn't open them using UTF-8, so I
forced another encoding. That might be the
> Ok - so, one thing that is helpful is: if you use a script - can you
> post the script instead of a patch ? :-) that way we save a lot of
> reviewer time.
>
I used a graphical find/replace manager. I don't remember how exactly the
regexp looked, but at first I removed all '/*.*/ ' commen
Hi there,
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 16:06 +0300, Povilas Kanapickas wrote:
> I've done some work on entry level tasks. Specifically, I've removed
> all #if 0 blocks in the LibreOffice source tree.
So - I did some more review; I left a few useful / commented pieces in
that were removed, but so
Hi!
One of the issues I see is in SampleICC, where Vetters.cpp includes
on Solaris and on all other non-Windows.
On NetBSD, it also needs to include errno.h to compile. I could add an
#if NetBSD to the Solaris case, but I don't think that sys/errno.h is
standardized and thus prefer to make it i
Michael Meeks píše v Po 18. 10. 2010 v 15:49 +0100:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:52 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > again a brief summary of what happened the 3rd week on LibreOffice
> > repos:
>
> Are we including commits to the 'build' module ?
I think that Thorsten did not incl
2010.10.18 12:37, Michael Meeks rašė:
> Hi Aurimas,
>
> On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 17:44 +0300, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
>> There are files where both spellings are used in the same file. Which
>> spelling should be used in this case?
>
> Much as I hate to say it (being English), we should use the
Hi Petr,
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:52 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> again a brief summary of what happened the 3rd week on LibreOffice
> repos:
Are we including commits to the 'build' module ?
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, it
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 07:43 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote:
> > I placed a copy of my build results at: http://jpowers.me
Looks good, the good news is that the vast majority are in the third
party modules, e.g. mozilla, lpsolve, berkleydb. I was able to fix a few
that belonged to us, e.g. soltools, s
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Joseph Powers
> Date: October 18, 2010 7:32:55 AM PDT
> To: libreoffice-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: CLang++ Analysis
>
> The build process is easy:
>
> Download the CLang analyzer
> Unpack it somewhere
> Add somewhere to your path.
>
> I unpacked
Hi there,
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 16:06 +0300, Povilas Kanapickas wrote:
> I've done some work on entry level tasks. Specifically, I've removed
> all #if 0 blocks in the LibreOffice source tree.
Wow.
> Also, a lot of bogus comments like /*N*/, /*?*/ and so on were
> removed.
Ok -
Hi Miklos,
it seems to be good, go ahead.
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 13:59 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi Cedric,
>
> I'm attaching a patch that fixes a crash on non-text frames when
> exporting as RTF.
>
> A reproducer is here:
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/ooo-gsoc/tree/writer/21976.d
Hi Julio,
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 17:58 -0300, Júlio Hoffimann wrote:
> My first time contributing with an open source project. I hope to help
> with a little.
Wow - this is a great first contribution ! :-)
> Patch2: Cleanup comments and some formatting.
So - I had a good go at th
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 06:38 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> Worked like a charm... and so much faster that make dev-install and
> hand 'testing'
Good stuff :-)
> I wonder, is there a way to avoid the whole rpm churning at then end
> of the build (the 'building module packimages' at the
Hello,
I've done some work on entry level tasks. Specifically, I've removed all #if
0 blocks in the LibreOffice source tree. Also, a lot of bogus comments like
/*N*/, /*?*/ and so on were removed. As more than thousand of files have
been changed I didn't try to make a separate patch for each one.
Hi,
again a brief summary of what happened the 3rd week on LibreOffice
repos:
bugfixes-week-41.txt all commits that reference a proper bug
id (from a variety of trackers - #i... referring to the OpenOffice
issuezilla, fdo# to freedesktop, rhbz# to RedHat bugzilla etc)
commit-log-week-41.txt list
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 00:11 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> because sequence checking should only be turned on for certain languages
> like Thai, Laotian, Khmer or Vietnamese and only when CTL is enabled.
> So, if CTL support is checked, we only need to check for sequence
> checking if: previously
Hi Cedric,
I'm attaching a patch that fixes a crash on non-text frames when
exporting as RTF.
A reproducer is here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/ooo-gsoc/tree/writer/21976.doc?h=ooo-test-files
OK to push? :)
From 1bcf42ef0f2310a4aee05053a21ad4da6decf3ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mi
Hi,
this patch replaces all occurrences of sizeof.*/.*sizeof.*\[ with
SAL_N_ELEMENTS in ure
-- Kenneth
diff --git a/sal/inc/systools/win32/uwinapi.h b/sal/inc/systools/win32/uwinapi.h
index 6c19788..7fda61e 100644
--- a/sal/inc/systools/win32/uwinapi.h
+++ b/sal/inc/systools/win32/uwinapi.h
@@ -1
Hi Mattias,
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 10:22 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
> Second time submitting this patch to the list - the first time I
> forgot [Libreoffice] in the subject line and presume it got eaten by
> people's spam filters!
Nah ! that is fine, it is possible the list is configur
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 15:21 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> I've pushed the branch 'feature/vos-removal' for review
>> I have rebased against master Saturday morning GMT, with relatively
>> few conflict.
>>
>> The resulting build passed a
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:21:52PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 13:15 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > > Did you configure with --with-system-boost ? There's a test in
> > > configure.in for a broken boos
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 13:15 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Did you configure with --with-system-boost ? There's a test in
> > configure.in for a broken boost header.
>
> Yes, I'm using system boost.
I know you're using system b
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Did you configure with --with-system-boost ? There's a test in
> configure.in for a broken boost header.
Yes, I'm using system boost.
> Another thing to check is what happens if you add
>
> $(SLO)$/zforfind.obj
>
> to the EXCEPT
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:54 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:14:25AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Why did you add -fexceptions to the arguments ?, I ask because there are
> > places in LibreOffice where its explicitly enabled, and others where its
> > explicitly disab
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:14:25AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Why did you add -fexceptions to the arguments ?, I ask because there are
> places in LibreOffice where its explicitly enabled, and others where its
> explicitly disabled, so globally enabling it wouldn't be something
> typically tes
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 10:40 +0200, Robert Sedak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I prepaired Croatian translation and gsicgeck of LO-3.2.99.2.
> You can get sdf on http://www.roby.hr/libreoffice/
You should work using the po files located in
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/build/tree/po
Did you try
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> patches replace sizeof/sizeof[0] with SAL_N_ELEMENTS in testing and sdk
>
> -- Kenneth
Thanks! Pushed.
D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://l
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:54:32AM +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch replaces all hits for "sizeof.*/.*sizeof.*\[" with
> SAL_N_ELEMENTS in libs-gui.
>
> -- Kenneth
Thanks! Pushed.
D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.free
Hi Jesus,
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 23:51 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This trival patch hides a perl error in oowintool when the .NET SDK is
> not found in the system.
Where is the patch ;) You may have forgotten to attach it to the email.
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice ha
Hi Cesare,
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 15:16 +0200, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> In my opinion:
>
> * 320 MB for an installer is too much. If you don't have a fast internet
> access or if you have a mobile provider that gives you time/data limit,
> probably you'd have to find another way to get LibreOffi
Hi,
patches replace sizeof/sizeof[0] with SAL_N_ELEMENTS in testing and sdk
-- Kenneth
diff --git a/odk/examples/OLE/activex/SOComWindowPeer.cpp b/odk/examples/OLE/activex/SOComWindowPeer.cpp
index 0b2fabf..a3f4d50 100644
--- a/odk/examples/OLE/activex/SOComWindowPeer.cpp
+++ b/odk/examples/OLE/a
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 23:36 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> As you can see, I already added "-fexceptions" to the g++ arguments.
Why did you add -fexceptions to the arguments ?, I ask because there are
places in LibreOffice where its explicitly enabled, and others where its
explicitly disabled, so
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 01:01 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> some "shadows a member of 'this'" and "unused parameter" warnings.
The binfilter is rather unloved, its effectively a copy of older
versions of sw/sd/sc and their dependencies, so if you see a warning in
binfilter and want to fix it, you c
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 15:21 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> I've pushed the branch 'feature/vos-removal' for review
> I have rebased against master Saturday morning GMT, with relatively
> few conflict.
>
> The resulting build passed a trivial 'smoketest' (openining a couple
> of spreadsheet, text
Hi Terrell,
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 18:59 -0400, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote:
> Actually, I'm not much of a hacker at all, more a systems engineer who
> can shell-script.
Great :-) then it should be easy (?) to add some funky script that will
detect your system, and check that the right buil
Hi Aurimas,
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 17:44 +0300, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
> There are files where both spellings are used in the same file. Which
> spelling should be used in this case?
Much as I hate to say it (being English), we should use the US
spellings consistently where possible :-) An
> * 320 MB for an installer is too much. If you don't have a fast internet
> access or if you have a mobile provider that gives you time/data limit,
> probably you'd have to find another way to get LibreOffice.
I can see that the size is an issue, but not because of download time.
320 MB is app
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:59:28 -0400, "Terrell Prude' Jr."
wrote:
> Actually, I'm not much of a hacker at all, more a systems engineer who
> can shell-script. But I figure I could do some of the non-sexy,
> janitorial "easy tasks" like getting rid of those "don't trust revision
> control" comme
58 matches
Mail list logo
