Signed-off-by: Prashant Shah
---
sw/source/ui/uno/unoatxt.cxx | 162 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sw/source/ui/uno/unoatxt.cxx b/sw/source/ui/uno/unoatxt.cxx
index 08451f6..79168ac 100644
--- a/sw/source/ui/uno/unoat
removed bogus comments from [writer] repository
file : /sw/source/ui/uno/unoatxt.cxx
From 668a11f199304fe316291943b29ef663846a9f84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prashant Shah
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:07:13 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] removed bogus comments
Signed-off-by: Prashant Shah
---
sw/sour
I just got started with OpenOffice this week and struggled with their install
(it hung twice -2d time at end so OO worked). Did a lot of learning with
MRI and got a little OO Basic code to ~work. Found LibreOffice and easily
chose to switch horses. Knew the Basic code was in My Macros:Standard
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Kayo Hamid wrote:
>
> Patch for base repository.
reviews and pushed.
I fixed a typo, other than that great works
Thanks.
Norbert
>
> revol_
>
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> ht
Committed, thanks
Fridrich
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 22:58 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> Patch for bin/create-tags and bin/tinbuild attached.
>
> To be added to the previous sent.
>
> beppec56.
>
> Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> > The third version of the patch this time working for build from scr
Howdy. I was asked to post a message here to kick off a discussion of
test script coordination. I'm volunteering to help with them because a)
it's simple, and b) I'm simple.
I know shell, as you can see from the add-modelines script I just
submitted, and I'm told that StarBASIC is "as easy", and t
Patch for bin/create-tags and bin/tinbuild attached.
To be added to the previous sent.
beppec56.
Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
The third version of the patch this time working for build from scratch.
But, a _big_ but, the change in unpack-extras and build-generic _may_
affect other mechanism of t
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 20:44 +0100, "Caolán McNamara"
wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 12:34 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> > I think this feature calls for a script getopts-style option where one
> > can select to either not clobber exsiting modelines (the default) or
> > remove and repla
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 12:34 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> I think this feature calls for a script getopts-style option where one
> can select to either not clobber exsiting modelines (the default) or
> remove and replace existing modelines.
A quick opengrok (http://opengrok.go-oo.org
Hi Caolán,
The EasyHack wasn't clear on whether the script should wipe out any
existing modelines. In the interests of caution, I had it back off if
they were present. However, I can see that overwritting existing
modelines is needed, especially if the script is to be at all useful
after it's firs
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 11:41 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> Howdy, all. It took some effort for this SysAdmin to craft a shell
> script to meet this "EasyHack",
The principal looks good. Here's a edge-case test file though, e.g.
writer/sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8atr.cxx
it already has a "
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:57 AM, jgraeme wrote:
> Patch removes unused #ifndef directives.
Reviewed and Pushed.
Thanks.
Norbert
>
> Graeme
>
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:57 AM, jgraeme wrote:
> Patch removes unused #ifndef directives.
Reviewed and pushed.
Thanks.
>
> Graeme
>
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/l
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Kayo Hamid wrote:
>
>
> Hi Norbert, thank you. Can you explain for me where is this definition
> (SAL_N_ELEMENTS) that all theses sources share in common? My knowledge in C++
> are few.
It is in
sal/inc/sal/macros.h:44:#define SAL_N_ELEMENTS(arr) (sizeof
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Kayo Hamid wrote:
>
>
> Hi Norbert, thank you. Can you explain for me where is this definition
> (SAL_N_ELEMENTS) that all theses sources share in common? My knowledge in C++
> are few.
> New patchs attached.
Thanks. looks good.
I just removed a chunk in calc:
-
The third version of the patch this time working for build from scratch.
But, a _big_ but, the change in unpack-extras and build-generic _may_
affect other mechanism of the build system I don't know yet (for ex.
/bin/bash -> /bin/sh).
Anyway with the attached patch I was able to build from sc
Another patch to remove unused #ifndef & #ifdef directives.
Graeme
From 48969785b45f581e48490362fd4a7dc5d1ced6f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: J. Graeme Lingard
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:48:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove redundant #ifndef & #ifdef directives
These unused directives are:-
- mu
Hi Norbert, thank you. Can you explain for me where is this definition
(SAL_N_ELEMENTS) that all theses sources share in common? My knowledge in C++
are few.
New patchs attached.Hi revol_
Thanks for the patch.
One remark. You want to use the macro SAL_N_ELEMENTS, not define your own
ELEMENTS
Patch removes unused #ifndef directives.
Graeme
From a9f6724dfbfccba7d2e6b9c11daf4561bea3b2f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: J. Graeme Lingard
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 17:49:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove redundant #ifndef directives
---
.../source/config/svt_addxmltostorageoptions.cxx |3
Canadian Health&Care http://yonnefhou.com/
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
The attached patch seems better then the one before.
Please have a look.
beppec56
Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
Hi all,
I stumbled on a couple of error while building with a recent git pull -r
from repo (this morning, around 8 CET).
System: Ubuntu 9.10
autogen command:
./autogen.sh --with-dist
> Just to clarify: I posted the script, as I thought it might be useful
> to someone else. But I did not intend to commit it to git (If I did,
> the post to the ML would have been in the form of a patch)
Sure, no problem, my reply was actually more in the context of the recent
changes back and
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Kayo Hamid wrote:
> I'm sending my patchs for review, can anyone see and reply back if it is ok
> or not? I do not known if it is correct ;-)
>
> revol_
>
>
>
Hi revol_
Thanks for the patch.
One remark. You want to use the macro SAL_N_ELEMENTS, not define your
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> Personal, but valid. To test that you actually don't introduce bashisms
>> in a script you can simply set env variable POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 and then
>> the bash when invoked as /bin/sh will behave as a strict posix shell.
>
> Unfortunately tha
i keep forgetting to reply-all to get it to the list :-)
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:58:26PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud
> wrote:
>> # go up the chain until you find a .git
>> while [ ${current_dir} != "/" -a -d "${current_dir}" -a ! -d
>> "${c
Hi all,
I stumbled on a couple of error while building with a recent git pull -r
from repo (this morning, around 8 CET).
System: Ubuntu 9.10
autogen command:
./autogen.sh --with-distro=LibreOfficeLinux --with-gcc-speedup=ccache
--with-git --with-num-cpus=2 --with-lang='en-US it' --enable-kd
> Personal, but valid. To test that you actually don't introduce bashisms
> in a script you can simply set env variable POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 and then
> the bash when invoked as /bin/sh will behave as a strict posix shell.
Unfortunately that doesn't work well enough- Even with POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 some
Am Fri, 8 Oct 2010 00:39:34 +0200
schrieb Miklos Vajna :
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 06:15:35PM +0200, Andreas Radke
> wrote:
> > '\''--without-git'\'' '\''--with-srcdir=/build/src'\''
>
> Did you try --with-git? There has been some issue with proper quoting
> when passing args to the internal con
Hi Fridrich, *,
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> On 09/10/10 07:54, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> Just one small nit: As we have members in the community whose platform
>> doesn't normally have a /bin/bash, please make sure any new shell script
>> introduced works with a plain
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 09:22:20AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> and apt-get listed many packages to be installed including several ones
> related to mono. Is it really necessary ? Indeed I am not sure if Ubuntu
No
> OpenOffice.org is representative of what is needed to build LibO beca
Comitted!
Thank you for the patch.
KAMI
2010-10-09 01:35 keltezéssel, jgraeme írta:
> A patch to remove some unused directives.
>
> Graeme
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 09/10/10 07:54, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Just one small nit: As we have members in the community whose platform
> doesn't normally have a /bin/bash, please make sure any new shell script
> introduced works with a plain non-bash POSIX shell,
Hi all,
I want to build LibO on my Ubuntu 10.04 64 bits. As stated on
TDF/develop webpage I need to prepare my computer. So I launched the
prescribed command with -s option :
apt-get -s build-dep openoffice.org
and apt-get listed many packages to be installed including several ones
related to m
33 matches
Mail list logo
