Hi all,
I searched in examples how to "block" in main thread on serving files
but I only found examples with the sequence summarized here:
MHD_start_daemon ... getc ... MHD_stop_daemon
For my use I'm searching to just run the server without having to wait
for a key or anything except ctrl+C o
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:04:52 +0100
José Bollo wrote:
rereading comment of MHD_USE_INTERNAL_POLLING_THREAD my question looks
stupid
sorry for the noise
> Hi all,
>
> I searched in examples how to "block" in main thread on serving files
> but I only found examples with the sequence summarized her
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:08:39 +0100
José Bollo wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:04:52 +0100
> José Bollo wrote:
>
> rereading comment of MHD_USE_INTERNAL_POLLING_THREAD my question looks
> stupid
No in fact the question is serious. There is no simple way to let run
MHD on the main thread. It requi
On 12/2/19 4:49 PM, José Bollo wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:08:39 +0100
> José Bollo wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:04:52 +0100
>> José Bollo wrote:
>>
>> rereading comment of MHD_USE_INTERNAL_POLLING_THREAD my question looks
>> stupid
>
> No in fact the question is serious. There is no si
Dear friends.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:49 PM José Bollo wrote:
> No in fact the question is serious. There is no simple way to let run
> MHD on the main thread. It requires implementing an external
> poll/select loop.
>
> Can you provide an integrated main that serves and doesn't return until
>
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:22 PM silvioprog wrote:
> In Rust and Pascal we generally call some locking function to stay
> "running" application, in those cases, it would be nice to call something
> like this:
>
> static int my_awesome_callback(void *cls) {
> return *application_terminated* ? MHD_
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 17:41:09 +0100
Christian Grothoff wrote:
> On 12/2/19 4:49 PM, José Bollo wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:08:39 +0100
> > José Bollo wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:04:52 +0100
> >> José Bollo wrote:
> >>
> >> rereading comment of MHD_USE_INTERNAL_POLLING_THREAD my
On 12/2/19 9:55 PM, José Bollo wrote:
>
> I tried to write something like "while(true) MHD_run();" but strace
> showed its inefficiency.
Oh my. Yes, that'd be bad.
> IMHO it can make sense: "1. setup 2. run" without exit conditon and not
> bound to any stdin, i.e. a normal unix daemon.
>
Well,
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 22:03:51 +0100
Christian Grothoff wrote:
> On 12/2/19 9:55 PM, José Bollo wrote:
> >
> > I tried to write something like "while(true) MHD_run();" but strace
> > showed its inefficiency.
>
> Oh my. Yes, that'd be bad.
>
> > IMHO it can make sense: "1. setup 2. run" without
On 12/2/19 10:18 PM, José Bollo wrote:
>> Well, that's trivial. Please consider the attached fragment (not
>> tested, but should be very close to what you need, modulo error
>> handling).
> I know it is trivial (my implementation below) but I advocate to offer
> a facility that does the job. It avo
10 matches
Mail list logo
