Hi Christan,
I'm not sure I really understand your point.
Regarding the detection of TLS backend's availability, one can use the
function MHD_TLS_is_feature_supported() to test if a backend is present.
Of course, if MHD was built without support for a TLS backend, a client
won't be able to use i
Hi Denis,
Well seen! This is a small typo but it highlighted several issues in my
update of existing tests. The OpenSSL engine was identified as GnuTLS and
it caused MHD to allow calls to GnuTLS-specific options that should be
rejected when using OpenSSL. As I forgot to change a few occurences of
Hi Evgeny,
I'm not familiar with the new API. I noticed it was under development but I
don't know much about it. I'll try to take time to review the current
proposal.
Cheers,
Gauthier
> Hi Gauthier,
> I've done impressive work.
> We have very similar plans for integrated support for multiple T
Yes, that is exactly what I would like to see, and AFAIK Evgeny has
started to hack on it.
-Christian
On 10/25/2017 04:20 PM, Gauthier Haderer wrote:
> Hi Christan,
>
> I'm not sure I really understand your point.
>
> Regarding the detection of TLS backend's availability, one can use the
> func
Hi,
There are requirements in one project I am working on to support http 2.0,
especially server push functionalities.
Is http 2.0 supported? If not, are there a release plan to support http 2.0?
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Yuyong
Hi Yuyong.
An interface for HTTP2 was sent to the trunk and it is under development:
https://github.com/Karlson2k/libmicrohttpd/blob/master/src/include/microhttpd2.h
Please take a look at this topic too:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libmicrohttpd/2017-08/msg00013.html
Cheers.
On Wed, Oct
Eh, no, microhttpd2.h has _nothing_ to do with HTTP 2.0. It is simply
about building a better interface for the existing HTTP 1.x.
In fact, I personally do not have plans to work on HTTP 2.0-support.
Happy hacking!
Christian
On 10/26/2017 01:23 AM, silvioprog wrote:
> Hi Yuyong.
>
> An interfa
