Hi Eric, a couple of POSIX questions for you from nbdkit.
The first question is from an AUR comment on nbdkit:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nbdkit#comment-937381
I think there's a bash-ism in the logscript parameter in this test:
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/blame/master/tests/
On 10/9/23 09:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Hi Eric, a couple of POSIX questions for you from nbdkit.
>
> The first question is from an AUR comment on nbdkit:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nbdkit#comment-937381
>
> I think there's a bash-ism in the logscript parameter in this test:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 12:57:14PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/9/23 09:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Hi Eric, a couple of POSIX questions for you from nbdkit.
> >
> > The first question is from an AUR comment on nbdkit:
> >
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nbdkit#comment-937381
On 10/9/23 13:12, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 12:57:14PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 10/9/23 09:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> Hi Eric, a couple of POSIX questions for you from nbdkit.
>>>
>>> The first question is from an AUR comment on nbdkit:
>>>
>>> https://aur
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 01:32:07PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/9/23 13:12, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 12:57:14PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> On 10/9/23 09:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>> Hi Eric, a couple of POSIX questions for you from nbdkit.
> >>>
> >>>
So one thing we could do for this test is to require (for the test)
that /bin/sh is bash, something like the patch below. I was only able
to test this in the positive case.
diff --git a/tests/test-log-script-info.sh b/tests/test-log-script-info.sh
index fa9b2ed32..d65f6415d 100755
--- a/tests/t
