On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 02:19:32PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 9/21/23 22:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> > As previous patches showed, the NBD spec does not yet forbid a server
> > sending us a size that does not fit in int64_t. We should gracefully
> > handle this during nbdinfo, rather than giving
On 9/21/23 22:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> As previous patches showed, the NBD spec does not yet forbid a server
> sending us a size that does not fit in int64_t. We should gracefully
> handle this during nbdinfo, rather than giving up early.
>
> With the same one-line hack to qemu to set the most sig
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:58:05PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> As previous patches showed, the NBD spec does not yet forbid a server
> sending us a size that does not fit in int64_t. We should gracefully
> handle this during nbdinfo, rather than giving up early.
>
> With the same one-line hack to
