On 5/31/23 17:48, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 12:45:16PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 5/31/23 04:10, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> While analyzing 'union sbuf' in preparation to add more members to the
>>> union, I noticed several things related to __attribute__((packed))
>>> that can b
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 12:45:16PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 5/31/23 04:10, Eric Blake wrote:
> > While analyzing 'union sbuf' in preparation to add more members to the
> > union, I noticed several things related to __attribute__((packed))
> > that can be improved. It helps to note that that
On 5/31/23 04:10, Eric Blake wrote:
> While analyzing 'union sbuf' in preparation to add more members to the
> union, I noticed several things related to __attribute__((packed))
> that can be improved. It helps to note that that the bulk of the
> members of 'union sbuf' are already marked packed s
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:10:13PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> While analyzing 'union sbuf' in preparation to add more members to the
> union, I noticed several things related to __attribute__((packed))
> that can be improved. It helps to note that that the bulk of the
> members of 'union sbuf' are
While analyzing 'union sbuf' in preparation to add more members to the
union, I noticed several things related to __attribute__((packed))
that can be improved. It helps to note that that the bulk of the
members of 'union sbuf' are already marked packed structures from
nbd-protocol.h, where we don'
