On 08.06.23 16:56, Eric Blake wrote:
Instead of ignoring the low-level error just to refabricate our own
message to pass to the caller, we can just plump the caller's errp
down to the low level.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
v4: new patch [Vladimir]
---
block/nbd.c | 16 ++--
1
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:56:47AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> Instead of ignoring the low-level error just to refabricate our own
> message to pass to the caller, we can just plump the caller's errp
plumb
(at least I got it right in the subject line...)
> down to the low level.
>
> Signed-off-b
Instead of ignoring the low-level error just to refabricate our own
message to pass to the caller, we can just plump the caller's errp
down to the low level.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
v4: new patch [Vladimir]
---
block/nbd.c | 16 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletio