> Hi, Ross! The discussion on this ticket should bring you up to speed.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3436038&group_id=50884&atid=461324
>
>> Also, what is the reason that the default signal backend cannot have
>> different event bases receiving different signals?
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Ross Lagerwall
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of the signalfd branch? It seems like the main
> problem with the implementation is the use of sigprocmask whose behavior
> isn't specified in a multithreaded environment and from my testing,
> doesn't have the de
