On 04/10/12 17:03, Nick Mathewson wrote:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3516647&group_id=50884&atid=461324
* Does this really belong on 2.0 or not? From your description of
the changes, it doesn't seem like a bugfix to me; it sounds much more
like a new feature. I'm open t
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Myk Taylor wrote:
> On 03/26/12 01:17, Myk Taylor wrote:
>>
>> Alright, now that I understand a little more about how to do this, let
>> me try this again : )
>
>
> The updated patches are now attached to the sourceforge Patches tracker:
>
> https://sourceforge.net
On 03/26/12 01:17, Myk Taylor wrote:
Alright, now that I understand a little more about how to do this, let
me try this again : )
The updated patches are now attached to the sourceforge Patches tracker:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3516647&group_id=50884&atid=461324
Thanks
On 12/12/11 12:21, Mark Ellzey wrote:
Would you mind submitting the patch branched against patches-2.0 on github?
Easier to pull in / comment / test.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:57:17AM -0800, Myk Taylor wrote:
I've written up a patch that allows evhttp to work for HTTPS where a
second (or furth
On 12/12/11 12:21, Mark Ellzey wrote:
Would you mind submitting the patch branched against patches-2.0 on github?
Easier to pull in / comment / test.
Actually, if it's ok, let me retarget this at trunk.
diff --git a/include/event2/http.h b/include/event2/http.h
index 5c9f0e5..5372208 100644
---
Would you mind submitting the patch branched against patches-2.0 on github?
Easier to pull in / comment / test.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:57:17AM -0800, Myk Taylor wrote:
> >I've written up a patch that allows evhttp to work for HTTPS where a
> >second (or further) request is sent on a evhttp_co
I've written up a patch that allows evhttp to work for HTTPS where a
second (or further) request is sent on a evhttp_connection that has
previously timed out and closed its underlying TCP connection.
Any thoughts on the patch? Does it need any modification in order to be
acceptable?
Thanks,