Hi,
i think that the chnages are ripe for being accepted and thus pushed
branch "pete_batard_ce_v3".
Rocky, please merge.
-
Tests made:
"git am" applied the v3 patches without complaints.
Both known problems of v2 are gone:
Hi,
the patch applies and compiles without complaints.
I was riddling about the exact meaning of "{ 0 }" when the struct has more
than one member. In Linux time.h struct tm is declared with 11 members.
Finally i found in C11 specs (ISO/IEC 9899:2011 6.7.9 21):
If there are fewer initializers in
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 3:12 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the patch applies and compiles without complaints.
>
> I was riddling about the exact meaning of "{ 0 }" when the struct has more
> than one member. In Linux time.h struct tm is declared with 11 members.
> Finally i found in C11 spec
Actually I don't mind if you guys sort it out as last time I checked (a
couple years ago), I had lost my ssh access right (which means that
right now I'm just using https to clone the repo) and I'm a bit busy
with other stuff ATM.
I'm actually quite happy to see that Thomas has take upon himse
Ok. Just give me the SHA1 of the code that you'd like to see in master and
I will test it as well. And assuming everything works and it looks like
what has been mentioned here, I will merge it and let everyone know.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 3:58 PM Pete Batard wrote:
> Actually I don't mind if yo
I guess that would be fdd76a8ee4f4f00f1eabc6f632322db800ee9970 from the
pete_batard_ce_v3 branch. And then there's the one patch from
pete_batard_ce_v3 with SHA 569c452f8d1650c0ec50ebeef7869b54ed9c8be6.
Thanks!
/Pete
On 2023.03.23 20:03, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
Ok. Just give me the SHA1 of the
And for clarity use git show to get the SHA1. I just pulled master and here
is what I currently see:
$ git show
commit 6f2426e8bf4dc5269ccbd9fbfa94340895f8be6e (HEAD -> master,
origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: Robert Kausch
Date: Wed Mar 15 00:02:10 2023 +0100
Fix crash reading CD TOC o
Ok got it - thanks!
I will have to do this a bit later though because I want to be careful and
test everything and I cannot do that right now.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:10 PM Pete Batard wrote:
> I guess that would be fdd76a8ee4f4f00f1eabc6f632322db800ee9970 from the
> pete_batard_ce_v3 branch.
Hi,
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> I was thinking that Pete would do the merge since he also has commit rights
> after the two of you decide that it is time to merge
Everybody is more qualified as git admin than i am.
Pete Batard wrote:
> Actually I don't mind if you guys sort it out as last time I
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 5:13 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> > I was thinking that Pete would do the merge since he also has commit
> rights
> > after the two of you decide that it is time to merge
>
> Everybody is more qualified as git admin than i am.
>
>
> Pete Bat
Hi all,
It's been a long time since I've been active here and it's time to
contribute some patches again...
I just pushed the cdtext-osx and cdtext-win32 branches which add/improve
support for reading CD-Text on those systems. The win32 branch also has
patches for the Windows-specific text c
11 matches
Mail list logo
