[lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread TheOldFellow
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. Richard. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.li

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread xinglp
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow : > Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being > avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? > > I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. > > Richard. Viceversa, I'd like to know

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread xinglp
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow : > Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being > avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? > > I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. > > Richard. Viceversa, I'd like to know

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread xinglp
sorry for typo. :-) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread Armin K.
On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote: > 2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow : >> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being >> avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? >> >> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternative

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread TheOldFellow
Armin K. wrote: > On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote: >> 2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow : >>> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being >>> avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? >>> >>> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow wrote: > > I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. > Richard, Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus? For example, I need to use okular (although I hate its terminal-spamming) and I believe (speaking from memory) that

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
TheOldFellow wrote: > Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is > being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd > compiles? > > I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. You may find http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads

[lfs-support] gcc-4.9.0 failure

2014-04-23 Thread Frans de Boer
I could not compile 4.9.0 since it always fails when staring to configure for 'libvtv' as showed next: ... make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/libgcc' make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/libgcc' Checking multi

Re: [lfs-support] gcc-4.9.0 failure

2014-04-23 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > I could not compile 4.9.0 since it always fails when staring to > configure for 'libvtv' as showed next: > [snip] > > Any suggestion? > > Frans. http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/3552 Pierre seems to be on the case -