On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 23:49 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> One thing to note is that there are several of these programs created
> and used by udev that are in /lib/udev, not the /usr hierarchy at all.
That's a product of the whole "separate /usr" argument, isn't it?
Simon.
--
http://linuxfromsc
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS
> is to not use /usr/libexec ??
>
> I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's
> what has been adopted or not.
>
> Thanks
>
On 04/19/2013 12:54 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS
>> is to not use /usr/libexec ??
>>
>> I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's
