[lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-18 Thread Alice Wonder
Hi, Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS is to not use /usr/libexec ?? I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's what has been adopted or not. Thanks -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxf

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-18 Thread Armin K.
On 04/19/2013 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Hi, > > Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS > is to not use /usr/libexec ?? > > I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's > what has been adopted or not. > > Thanks > It's not yet part of t

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-18 Thread Alice Wonder
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 06:00 +0200, Armin K. wrote: > On 04/19/2013 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS > > is to not use /usr/libexec ?? > > > > I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's > >

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alice Wonder wrote: > Hi, > > Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS > is to not use /usr/libexec ?? > > I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's > what has been adopted or not. We have generally avoided it, but I'm not sure we should.