Hi all,
I'm fairly new to LFS and enjoying the build so far. I've made it to
6.10 "Adjusting the toolchain" in Version SVN-x86_64-20070807
When I ran the command below:
grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
it returned the following:
SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-
unknown-linux-gnu/li
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:53 AM, William Stevenson
wrote:
> I'm fairly new to LFS and enjoying the build so far. I've made it to
> 6.10 "Adjusting the toolchain" in Version SVN-x86_64-20070807
WTH?!?!?!
You are using a obslete x86_64 book, and a old one at it too.
If you want a good x86_64 system
William,
I built my own box and have an Athalon processor with 4GB RAM, so I'd
like to be able to address the full 4GB. I didn't think I could do
this with a 32 bit operating system.
Also, when I went to download the LiveCD, this is the manual that came
with the most recent download from the mirr
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:23 AM, William Stevenson
wrote:
> That said, I seemed to pass the Glibc test. There was only one extra
> error and it was similar to the other nptl ones mentioned. If anyone
> has any thoughts, I'd like to keep going if possible.
Uh... you should switch to CLFS immediatel
> Uh... you should switch to CLFS immediately to build this system,
> becuase, the book you are using, does not have a bootloader, among
> other things.
got it, thanks - will do
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 11:38 AM, William Immendorf
wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:23 AM, William Stevenson
> wrot
On Sunday 03 May 2009 10:56:22 William Immendorf wrote:
> You are using a obslete x86_64 book, and a old one at it too.
This is wrong! It should be:
... an obslete ... an old ...
--
http://www.wowgreen.net/11324
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linux
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, wrote:
> This is wrong! It should be:
>
> ... an obslete ... an old ...
What I meant by "obslete", is that it isn't used anymore.
William
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: S
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 12:40:38PM -0500, William Immendorf wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, wrote:
> > This is wrong! It should be:
> >
> > ... an obslete ... an old ...
> What I meant by "obslete", is that it isn't used anymore.
>
> William
I think he was correcting your English; you
