On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 06:35:06PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Define development. We patch the source, so IMO we are doing
> 'development' to some extent.
I guess that in the context of building LFS I think of the patch as
just another bit of source, and applying the patch to be on a par with
u
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 06:32:23PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jeremy Henty wrote these words on 02/27/09 18:18 CST:
> > What am I missing here?
>
> The 600 previous discussions about the same subject. Please
> reference the archives and you'll probably have more information
> that
Jeremy Henty wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 06:32:23PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
>> Jeremy Henty wrote these words on 02/27/09 18:18 CST:
>>
>>> What am I missing here?
>>>
>> The 600 previous discussions about the same subject. Please
>> reference the archives and
