On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:36:14 -0400
Baho Utot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does LFS support SATA out of the box?
I'm curious about the term 'out the box' when applied to LFS. Isn't
the whole point that there isn't a box? Or if there is, YOU put it in
there?
A more interesting question is: " Doe
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 8:09 pm, Chris Staub wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > I have just finished installing LFS-6.2 jhalfs build on my notebook a
> > DELL INSPERION 1501. It has a SATA hard drive controller. The
> > motherboard is some kind of ATI board from dmesg and from the sys.log.
> >
> > I
-- Original message --
From: Baho Utot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wednesday 27 June 2007 8:09 pm, Chris Staub wrote:
> > Baho Utot wrote:
> > > I have just finished installing LFS-6.2 jhalfs build on my notebook a
> > > DELL INSPERION 1501. It has a SATA hard drive
On 6/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 686-pc-linux-gnu (B)LFS, 2.6.21.3,
> UDEV-112
>
> On my system, there's plenty of 'modalias' files all
> over the place ('/sys/class', '/sys/devices')
> but not in '/sys/bus'.
> The document looks up-to-date (for example, the word
On 6/28/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/28/07, go moko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In BLFS development, chapter GDM-2.14.10, before the build of the package,
> > there's the creation of a gdm group and a gdm user. It's said that it's for
> > taking control of the gdm-binary daemo
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 06:31:57AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I'm on 2.6.20 and there are still modalias files under
> /sys/bus/*/devices/*/modalias. That may have changed in 2.6.21,
> though.
Apparently not:
# uname -r
2.6.21.5-0
# ls -1d -- /sys/bus/*/devices/*/modalias | wc -l
38
Jeremy
Hi Dan, Jeremy,
Thank you very much for your thoughtful and valuable comments.
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I'm on 2.6.20 and there are still modalias files under
> /sys/bus/*/devices/*/modalias.
> That may have changed in 2.6.21, though.
Jeremy Henty answers:
> Apparently not:
> [I'm on 2.6.21.5-0]
>
Hello,
I know most of you don't hang out in #LFS-Support, but right
now there is no support for Ubuntu Feisty 7.04 release. They do not
have a libc6-dev package for the distro and no one can build binutils
because of having no crt1.o and gcc won't even build dummy.c. If
anyone comes
On 6/28/07, William Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know most of you don't hang out in #LFS-Support, but right
> now there is no support for Ubuntu Feisty 7.04 release. They do not
> have a libc6-dev package for the distro and no one can build binutils
> because of having no crt1
