Hello!
I started building my LFS today. Everything went fine, until I tried to build
Expect.
I built and installed Tcl the following way:
1. Downloaded the latest sources (version 8.5a5) from Sourceforge
2. Changed to the unix directorz inside the source
3. ./configure --prefix=/tools && make &&
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:36:59AM +, Oliver Strnad wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I started building my LFS today. Everything went fine, until I tried to build
> Expect.
>
> I built and installed Tcl the following way:
> 1. Downloaded the latest sources (version 8.5a5) from Sourceforge
If you change
Hi Ken!
Thank you for your fast response!
> > 5. ln -sv tclsh8.4 /tools/bin/tclsh
>
> Doesn't 8.5a5 install tclsh8.5 ?
I copy&pasted that line directly from the book. But at the time I created that
link I wrote tclsh8.5 . :)
> Problems with headers can be a real aggravation - sometimes it'
On 2/12/07, Oliver Strnad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Problems with headers can be a real aggravation - sometimes it's
> > fairly easy to see what is wrong, other times it all looks good but
> > fails because of a seemingly trivial and unrelated change elsewhere.
> > If you are interested and
As stated on the website for TCL, TCL 8.5 is development software and
should be used by developers only. The LFS projects don't use
development software as a rule.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
I wasn't following this, because I know nothing about SDL, but I
have used xorg on (non-PCI-E) radeons.
It didn't have much to do with SDL though. But meh, I have no idea why
Xinerama is doing weird stuff then. It all seems in order.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> Wasn't sure if this is an LFS or BLFS question since it deals with an
> upgrade of an established system rather than a question from the book...
> but anyhow, here's the deal:
>
> I have been running LFS for about 4 years now with a fresh rebuild
> whenever I get new hard
With all due respect, I have been down many of these obvious paths.
I have the latest instance of Scilab working which runs from a tcl/tk
engine (which requires ldconfig to be run - and have run again as requested)
I beleieve there is something in the package makefile that needs
altering. I hav
On 2/12/07, Kevin Annies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> gcc -ansi -O -Wall -fPIC -Ilibelf -I/usr/X11R6/include -c trace.c
> gcc -ansi -O -Wall -fPIC -Ilibelf -I/usr/X11R6/include -c tcltk_notifier.c
> gcc -ansi -O -Wall -fPIC -Ilibelf -I/usr/X11R6/include -c win32.c
> gcc -rdynamic -o cnet applica
Hi all,
first of all: Sorry for my bad english. :)
I'm experimenting a long time now with LFS/BLFS and i am sure that this
is a very nice way for an own, clean version of a GNU/Linux system.
But there is one thing which is bothering, namely package management.
I installed my LFS system like the
Rumor has it that Randy McMurchy may have mentioned these words:
>Athena P wrote these words on 02/10/07 13:04 CST:
>
> > And, finally, in terms of pure performance (speed) is all this
> > optimization really worth the effort?
>
>IMHO, a definite no. Not only will you not see the performance
>gain
On Saturday 10 February 2007 23:38, Steffen H. Larsen wrote:
> [...] but now I looked at the post above me and well I saw that
> he used
> the command like this
>
> root (hd0,0)
>
> and I tried that too and now it seem to work.
> I guess the last number was more
> important than what I thourght it
Hallo,
I have problems to make glibc-2.3.6 under hostsystem ubuntu 6.10 and lfs
Version 6.2
see book
5. Constructing a Temporary System
5.6. Glibc-2.3.6
i did :
cp -Rv include/asm-i386 /tools/include/asm
cp -Rv include/linux /tools/include
- configure goes though
- make says /tools/include/a
Hallo again,
I tryed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr$ cp -Rv include/asm-generic/ /tools/include/asm-generic
was it a good idea ? well, make came a litle fruther.
[...]
In file included from version.c:33:
/mnt/lfs/glibc-build/csu/version-info.h:2: error: missing terminating "
character
/mnt/lfs/glibc-b
On 2/12/07, Kai Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i did :
>
> cp -Rv include/asm-i386 /tools/include/asm
> cp -Rv include/linux /tools/include
These are from linux-libc-headers-2.6.12.0?
> - configure goes though
> - make says /tools/include/asm/errno.h:4:31: error: asm-generic/errno.h:
> No
Hey Dan,
thanx
1. used the wrong header fils
2. I did work in the wrong directory !!
after fixing that I got following error:
In file included from version.c:33:
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/version-info.h:2: error: missing terminating "
character
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/version-i
On 2/12/07, Kai Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Dan,
> thanx
>
> 1. used the wrong header fils
> 2. I did work in the wrong directory !!
>
> after fixing that I got following error:
>
> In file included from version.c:33:
> /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/version-info.h:2: error: missing t
Ok,
No offence meant!
I gonna start again.
Thanx Kai
Dan Nicholson schrieb:
> On 2/12/07, Kai Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey Dan,
>> thanx
>>
>> 1. used the wrong header fils
>> 2. I did work in the wrong directory !!
>>
>> after fixing that I got following error:
>>
>> In file incl
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:21:02PM +0100, Kai Ulrich wrote:
> after fixing that I got following error:
>
> In file included from version.c:33:
> /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/version-info.h:2: error: missing terminating
> " character
> /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/version-info.h:3: error
Im not sure if you realize this but there is a bug in bash 3.2 that breaks
ncurses 5.6, there is a bash32 patch.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Galaxy Travel writes:
> Im not sure if you realize this but there is a bug in bash 3.2 that breaks
> ncurses 5.6, there is a bash32 patch.
>
>
Can you please specify what the bug is, and perhaps provide a link to the
patch?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On Mon, Feb 12, at 08:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Galaxy Travel writes:
>
> > Im not sure if you realize this but there is a bug in bash 3.2 that breaks
> > ncurses 5.6, there is a bash32 patch.
> >
> >
>
> Can you please specify what the bug is, and perhaps provide a link to the
> patch
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Randy has placed Wednesday, Feb. 14th as the release date for
> BLFS-6.2.0. I'd like to ask people to take a little time to review the
> book and look for any changes that can improve the book before
> release.
>
> I've created a new ticket #2242[1] to collect any small issue
On 2/12/07, Thierry Nuttens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following links
>
> ln -v -sf ../init.d/setclock /etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K46setclock &&
> ln -v -sf ../init.d/setclock /etc/rc.d/rc6.d/K46setclock
>
> looks for me not at the right place but in the lfs (chapt 7.5).
>
> May be I'm wrong
I'm not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> first of all: Sorry for my bad english. :)
>
> I'm experimenting a long time now with LFS/BLFS and i am sure that this
> is a very nice way for an own, clean version of a GNU/Linux system.
>
> But there is one thing which is bothering, namely package managemen
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 15:56 +, TheOldFellow wrote:
> You did run 'make oldconfig' to update the .config file, didn't you?
{blush} well... now I did. And by a totally unrelated coincidence, the
system boots up just fine now.
--
Peter B. Steiger
Cheyenne, WY
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, at 08:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Can you please specify what the bug is, and perhaps provide a link to the
>> patch?
>
> I guess he is referring to include/MKhashsize.sh
> Particularly in the following variable.
>
> TABSIZE=`grep -v '^[ #]' $CAPS | g
27 matches
Mail list logo
