Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass2 cannot find limits.h

2006-07-03 Thread f . l .
seems fixinc.sh have been run, and thus caused this problem, maybe i have to modify the Makefile.in On 7/3/06, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 7/3/06, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> You can't do that. You must use /tools. It doesn't matter what

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass2 cannot find limits.h

2006-07-03 Thread f . l .
On 7/3/06, kriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: can you tell how you make gcc-4.1.1 pass1 ? cause in it the doc say that bootstrap don't work anymore -- like this, ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --prefix=/tools \ --libexecdir=/tools/lib --with-local-prefix=/tools \ --disable-nls --enable-shared --en

Re: mount doesn't recognize hda1 or 2

2006-07-03 Thread f . l .
you was able to mount that partition, is it still mountable on other system, for example, not using lfs live cd, On 7/2/06, William Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * I am using the LFS Live CD as my host system * I created three partitions with parted: hda1, hda2 and swap. * My partition

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass2 cannot find limits.h

2006-07-03 Thread kriss
f.l. a écrit : > On 7/3/06, kriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> can you tell how you make gcc-4.1.1 pass1 ? >> cause in it the doc say that bootstrap don't work anymore >> -- > > like this, > > ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --prefix=/tools \ >--libexecdir=/tools/lib --with-local-prefix=/tools \ >

gcc-4.1.1 pass1 errors

2006-07-03 Thread kriss
hi make bootstrap return : /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.so when searching for -lc /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.a when searching for -lc /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.so when searching for -lc /tools/bin/ld: skipping inco

Re: mount doesn't recognize hda1 or 2

2006-07-03 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 08:40:48AM -0700, William Stevenson wrote: > * I am using the LFS Live CD as my host system > > * I created three partitions with parted: hda1, hda2 and swap. > > * My partition table looks like: > > Disk geometry for /dev/hda: 0kB - 41GB > Disk label type: bsd

Re: mount doesn't recognize hda1 or 2

2006-07-03 Thread Randy McMurchy
f.l. top-posted these words on 07/03/06 02:47 CST: > you was able to mount that partition, > is it still mountable on other system, for example, not using lfs live cd, As much as we all appreciate you trying to provide some help to the users in the community, doing it via top-posting two lines (no

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass1 errors

2006-07-03 Thread kriss
kriss a écrit : > hi > make bootstrap return : > /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.so when > searching for -lc > /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.a when > searching for -lc > /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.so when searching for -l

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass1 errors

2006-07-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/3/06, kriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi make bootstrap return : /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.so when searching for -lc /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.a when searching for -lc /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.so when

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass1 errors

2006-07-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/3/06, kriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: nobody can tell me what is wrong in my ubuntu dapper x86_64 ? You never mentioned this before, ace. LFS book is only tested on x86. Looking again, your error is because you're mixing 64 bit and 32 bit. Look here. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/clfs/

RE: Dhcpcd not working

2006-07-03 Thread David Barron
Well, I tried changing the ifconfig.eth0 to ifconfig.e1000 and now I'm getting Interface e1000 doesn't exist. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass2 cannot find limits.h

2006-07-03 Thread Chris Staub
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: seems fixinc.sh have been run, and thus caused this problem, maybe i have to modify the Makefile.in No, the problem is you are ignoring the book's instructions and doing your own thing. Did you even bother reading even one word I wrote? If you aren't going to listen to

Re: Dhcpcd not working

2006-07-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/3/06, David Barron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, I tried changing the ifconfig.eth0 to ifconfig.e1000 and now I'm getting Interface e1000 doesn't exist. I don't really know what to tell you then. Maybe you can add some debugging statements into /etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifup. Try

vga=795 kernel option

2006-07-03 Thread Steven Vancoillie
Hi, I managed to install my first LFS system, hoera. I put a kernel option vga=795 in the grub boot menu, but this doesn't seems to work. I looked in BLFS, but couldn't find anything. Is there an obvious reason why this doesn't work? Do I have to change something in the kernel configuration? (t

Re: vga=795 kernel option

2006-07-03 Thread Chris Staub
Steven Vancoillie wrote: Hi, I managed to install my first LFS system, hoera. I put a kernel option vga=795 in the grub boot menu, but this doesn't seems to work. I looked in BLFS, but couldn't find anything. Is there an obvious reason why this doesn't work? Do I have to change something in th

Re: vga=795 kernel option

2006-07-03 Thread Steven Vancoillie
Chris Staub wrote: > Steven Vancoillie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I managed to install my first LFS system, hoera. >> >> I put a kernel option vga=795 in the grub boot menu, >> but this doesn't seems to work. >> I looked in BLFS, but couldn't find anything. >> >> Is there an obvious reason why this doesn'

Re: vga=795 kernel option

2006-07-03 Thread Rainer Peter Feller
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 16:59 +0200, Steven Vancoillie wrote: > It doesn't change the resolution of my screen, so actually it's the > same as not giving vga=795. looks like [EMAIL PROTECTED] so you need vesafb and fbconsole CONFIG_FB=y CONFIG_FB_VESA=y CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y or something lik

Re: vga=795 kernel option

2006-07-03 Thread Steven Vancoillie
Rainer Peter Feller wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 16:59 +0200, Steven Vancoillie wrote: >> It doesn't change the resolution of my screen, so actually it's the >> same as not giving vga=795. > > looks like [EMAIL PROTECTED] > so you need vesafb and fbconsole > > CONFIG_FB=y > CONFIG_FB_VESA=y > C

Re: Multiple Sessions

2006-07-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Steven Vancoillie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Why can't you continue to use your host system? I will be using my host system, I want to run Chap 6 now. But if I get the drift of your question, the host system runs with a real /dev on the root filesystem. It's a LFS-4.1 system running with a

Re: Multiple Sessions

2006-07-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will be using my host system, I want to run Chap 6 now. But if I get the drift of your question, the host system runs with a real /dev on the root filesystem. It's a LFS-4.1 system running with a "test" 2.6.11.12 kernel compiled without

Re: 6.12 readjusting the toolchain : crt1.o : No such file error

2006-07-03 Thread Vladimir A. Pavlov
On, Sunday 02 July 2006 20:15 Edouard KLEIN wrote: > *startfile_prefix_spec: > /usr/lib Haha! You aren't the first one having this problem :) Add a slash at the end of the path: > *startfile_prefix_spec: > /usr/lib/ -- Nothing but perfection pv -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/l

RE: Dhcpcd not working

2006-07-03 Thread David Barron
> > It looks like you guys are getting your e-mails crossed. > David found one way to fix it (removing the udev rule that > created e1000) while Dan is suggesting another way (telling > the network scripts to use the e1000 interface that udev was > creating). Either method would work but usi

Re: Dhcpcd not working

2006-07-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/3/06, David Barron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am still getting one error, however, and while it's not causing any apparent problems I was wondering if there was a solution. After dhcpcd is started I get this: Adding IPv4 address xx.xx.xx.xx to the e1000 interface... RTNETLINK answers: F

libiconv

2006-07-03 Thread Naga Gangadhar Reddy
When I tried to build PHP on my LFS, it gave the following error can any one help me?? In function `php_iconv_stream_filter_dtor':undefined reference to `libiconv_close'  In function `php_iconv_stream_filter_append_bucket': undefined reference to `libiconv' undefined reference to `libiconv' undefin

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass2 cannot find limits.h

2006-07-03 Thread f . l .
Chris, thanks for your reply, really. but i think the problem is not as described by you. as you know, instruction on the lfs-book are some sort of road map, as long as you know what you are doing, you can do your own stuff, surely. to this topic, the problem is that what i used is different v

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass2 cannot find limits.h

2006-07-03 Thread Chris Staub
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, thanks for your reply, really. but i think the problem is not as described by you. as you know, instruction on the lfs-book are some sort of road map, as long as you know what you are doing, you can do your own stuff, surely. to this topic, the problem is that

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass2 cannot find limits.h

2006-07-03 Thread f . l .
You *can* do your own stuff (after all, the motto of LFS is "Your distro, your rules). However, there is a difference between customizing to your liking, and making stuff different for absolutely no reason. You sure there are reason to do so, one is that if noone will try this, then no one will

Re: gcc-4.1.1 pass2 cannot find limits.h

2006-07-03 Thread Chris Staub
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: certainly can change instructions and versions, assuming that you actually know what you're doing. However, if you do something like change the location of /tools, then you clearly *do not* know what you are doing. It's that simple. -- i dont think /tools is that import

Re: mount doesn't recognize hda1 or 2

2006-07-03 Thread William Stevenson
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:48:45 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Disk geometry for /dev/hda: 0kB - 41GB > > Disk label type: bsd >^^^ > Why ? Bsd disklabels are a very uncommon choice here, possibly > something in the tools is buggy in this combination. Ken, thank you, that solved m