Dear list members:
Anyone knows about the gentoo linux security advisor labeled «GLSA
200507-05 / zlib»?
(More information can be founded at
http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200507-05.xml )
The problem is a buffer overflow in zlib that permits the execution of
arbitrary code in
José Carlos Carrión Plaza wrote:
Dear list members:
Anyone knows about the gentoo linux security advisor labeled «GLSA
200507-05 / zlib»?
Yep, we've fixed this in LFS-6.1-pre2 and also the devlopment (trunk)
version of the book.
But which are the programs of LFS and BLFS that are been
co
Hi folks,
Continued building LFS
"6.11.1. Installation of Glibc" which looks more or
less the same as "5.8. Glibc-2.3.4-20040701"
The first part went through without complaint.
>>>
Remark: Since the FC3 box was freshly turned on,
re-run following commands;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su -
Password:
Hi folks,
Section 6.11. Glibc-2.3.4-20040701
http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter06/glibc.html
first part went through without complaint
# make
# make check
..
...
make[2]: ***
[/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/stdio-common/scanf4.out]
Error 134
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/m
Stephen Liu wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -n -t ramfs none /dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t devpts -o gid=4,mode=620
none /dev/pts
mount: mount point /dev/pts does not exist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t tmpfs none /dev/shm
mount: mount point /dev/shm does not exist
Why did you run the
Hi Andrew,
> Stephen Liu wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -n -t ramfs none /dev
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t devpts -o
> gid=4,mode=620
> > none /dev/pts
> > mount: mount point /dev/pts does not exist
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t tmpfs none /dev/shm
> > mount: mount point /dev/sh
I'm building a lfs-6.0 linux-system. I reached the 6.8 chapter, but I
just can't get the /dev directory populated.
I read other messages about similar problems, but the solution was to
mount the sysfs.
I've tried to do it a lot of times, but I didn't have it populated.
Going to the binutils chap
Hi folks,
FC3
===
After booting the PC how to login root shell with bash
prompt as
root:/#
I already re-ran following commands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# export LFS=/mnt/lfs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mkdir -p $LFS/{proc,sys}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t proc proc $LFS/proc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount
Stephen Liu wrote:
Today I turned on the box resuming building LFS and
re-mounted all mount points starting from "Section
6.2. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems"
http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter06/kernfs.htm
onward and came to this situation.
I see. After doing the 'fa
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, [ISO-8859-1] José Carlos Carrión Plaza wrote:
> Dear list members:
>
> Anyone knows about the gentoo linux security advisor labeled «GLSA
> 200507-05 / zlib»?
>
Hopefully, that's the same one that archaic posted a patch for on
lfs-security earlier this week (i.e. fixed in 6.1-
José Carlos Carrión Plaza schrieb:
> The question is:
>
> The zlib library is compiled in static and shared forms. Once it will be
> updated, the shared versions will be accessible inmediately. But, the
> programs compiled against the static version of this library remained
> with the old (and vul
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Dan Osterrath wrote:
>
> Have a look at http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/find-zlib
> This perl script searches for programs statically linked against zlib.
>
Thanks for the reminder, Dan.
On my 6.1-testing system, _nothing_ shows except rsync's modified
version of zlib
On 7/8/05, Declan Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Move or rename the /lib/modules/ subdir before you do
> make modules_install. You can build, fix grub, and so forth before the
> modules_install.
>
> Also be aware that the 'depmod -ae -F' that the kernel runs checks
> _all_ the module tree
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS 6.1. This release includes a large number of package upgrades
(including Linux-2.6.11.12, GCC-3.4.3 and Glibc-2.3.4) and security
fixes (including the recently disclosed zlib vulnerability). It also
includes a large am
I have built a LFS system, and I would like to find
out how I could build it using uclibc instead of
glibc.
I'm not interested on putting it on a floppy or
something, I just want to build a system which should
be as large as 30-40 MB.
As I've seen, binaries compiled against uclibc are
very small.
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:35:41PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On my 6.1-testing system, _nothing_ shows except rsync's modified
> version of zlib.
OT, *why* does rsync do this? I've Googled lots of discussions about
making gzip rsync-friendly but it's not clear if this has been
implemented, or
On 7/10/05, Razvan Cristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have built a LFS system, and I would like to find
> out how I could build it using uclibc instead of
> glibc.
>
> I'm not interested on putting it on a floppy or
> something, I just want to build a system which should
> be as large as 30-
Hi there, this is my first post on the list.
I'm stating my studies to build my LFS... My first question is:
Is there many diferences to build my LFS with ext2 and with ReiserFS ?
My host Linux suports ReiserFS and I have alerady formated my LFS
partition with ReiserFS...
I think that the un
18 matches
Mail list logo
