On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:01:28PM +0100, Juan A. Moreno wrote:
> On Monday 03 November 2008 20:08:12 Randy McMurchy wrote:
> > Juan A. Moreno wrote these words on 11/03/08 12:52 CST:
> > > What man pages are better?
> >
> > I would prefer to use the Shadow man pages. IMO, it's better to use
> > ma
On Monday 03 November 2008 20:08:12 Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Juan A. Moreno wrote these words on 11/03/08 12:52 CST:
> > What man pages are better?
>
> I would prefer to use the Shadow man pages. IMO, it's better to use
> man pages from the native package rather than the generic ones from
> the man-
Juan A. Moreno wrote these words on 11/03/08 12:52 CST:
> What man pages are better?
I would prefer to use the Shadow man pages. IMO, it's better to use
man pages from the native package rather than the generic ones from
the man-pages package.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld vers
Hi.
I am building the current svn version of LFS (20081031). The shadow-4.1.2.1
package wants to install the passwd.5 and getspnam.3 man pages, already
installed by the man-pages-3.11 package.
What man pages are better? If we prefer the version of the man-pages-3.11
package, we can use commands
