Hi again!
First, thank all of you for the replies!
On Monday 18 September 2006 03:05, Ken Moffat wrote:
> "I'm a developer" - _what_ are you developing ? the phrase means
> many different things. If you are developing your own distro, you
> don't normally want multiple versions of things, havin
On 9/16/06, Vladimir A. Pavlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's assume we installed _all_ the packages into separate
subdirectories of /usr/pkg (the packages needed for boot should be
placed to /pkg, while ones not needed should go to /usr/pkg. To
simplify the description, we install all of them
hi PV
i suggest you to devel a systeme management tool
that can handle differents versions
so you'll have no problems in futur
thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, Sep 17, at 10:23 Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
>
> > > Now I have a package that cannot be compiled with glibc-2.3.6 since it
> > > requires glibc-2.4.
> >
> > Is this real, or a made up example ? Any _source_ that needs a
> > specific version of glibc is at least unusual.
>
> It's my gues
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 10:23:55PM +0400, Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
> The bad things for me are:
>
> 1. Rebuilding a whole system (including BLFS) requires too much time.
>Adding one really needed library is much faster.
>
Sure. I'm trying to point out that you can easily spend more time
th
On Sunday 17 September 2006 03:00, Ken Moffat wrote:
> What is so bad about scripting your builds, and then building a new
> system with the latest versions of everything ? Yes, it means
> having at least two potential '/' filesystems, and probably a
> separate /home, but it's no big deal and mea
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:01:07PM +0400, Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to know what all of you think about the following idea.
>
As somebody who only barely uses package management (I keep a note
of what gets installed), and who typically rebuilds his desktop
systems every few mo
Hi!
I'd like to know what all of you think about the following idea.
There is an idea about installing software in a way that simplifies
upgrading to newer versions without breaking the "links/dependencies"
between the currently installed applications/libraries. The idea is
basen on "Install in S
