Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot (but it does now)

2009-11-30 Thread Alberto Hernando
On Sunday 29 November 2009 23:00:47 Ken Moffat wrote: > At some point (I thought it was *before* 2.6.28, but maybe I'm mistaken) > the kernel option for IDE disks changed (as part of the move to libata). > Unfortunately, all my systems use SATA drives, so I'm not entirely sure > which option is rel

Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread linux fan
On 11/29/09, linux fan wrote: > The "VFS can't find ..." suggests that the boot loader (grub/lilo) > done its job and the kernel was loading until it choked on the > filesystem fstab told it, If the message is exactly: Kernel panic -not syncing VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)

Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alberto Hernando wrote: > Hi. > > I've tried it, and: > > root:/boot/grub# grub-setup -r '(hd0,8)' > No device is specified. I gave incorrect advice before. Try: grub-setup '(hd0)' or grub-setup /dev/sda The -r should not be there. The syntax is: grub-setup [OPTION]... DEVICE If

Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread linux fan
On 11/29/09, Alberto Hernando wrote: > ... The error is the same, VFS > can't find a valid root system, "please add a valid root option". I > .. and /etc/fstab is as the book says. If /etc/fstab is as the book says (verbatim), it won't work. You must interpolate /dev/ / defaults

Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread Ken Moffat
2009/11/29 Alberto Hernando : > Hi. > > I'm building LFS-6.5 (-svn, actually), and I can't make it boot. I've done > the same in two machines, an old athlon amd and a pentium-iv. Kernel builds > fine in both systems, but none of them can boot. The error is the same, VFS > can't find a valid root sy

Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alberto Hernando wrote: > Hi. > > I've tried it, and: > > root:/boot/grub# grub-setup -r '(hd0,8)' > No device is specified. > > The same. I've also tried several things using slashes and still the same. > Is there really something wrong with using lilo? I mean, how can I be sure > that grub wil

Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread Alberto Hernando
Hi. I've tried it, and: root:/boot/grub# grub-setup -r '(hd0,8)' No device is specified. The same. I've also tried several things using slashes and still the same. Is there really something wrong with using lilo? I mean, how can I be sure that grub will be able to boot a kernel that lilo can't?

Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alberto Hernando wrote: >> Make shure that your IDE/PATA/SATA drivers are built right in the >> kernel. > All these drivers are built in the kernel. > Now I'm trying to use GRUB following the book and I get this: > > root:/# grub-setup > No device is specified. > > root:/# grub-setup -r (hd0,8

Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread Alberto Hernando
> Honestly, unless you are using pure64, you should use GRUB instead. > Make shure that your IDE/PATA/SATA drivers are built right in the > kernel. Just so you know. > > Hi. All these drivers are built in the kernel. Now I'm trying to use GRUB following the book and I get this: root:/# grub-set

Re: linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread William Immendorf
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Alberto Hernando wrote: > I'm building LFS-6.5 (-svn, actually), and I can't make it boot. I've done > the same in two machines, an old athlon amd and a pentium-iv. Kernel builds > fine in both systems, but none of them can boot. The error is the same, VFS > can't

linux-2.6.31.6 doesn't boot

2009-11-29 Thread Alberto Hernando
Hi. I'm building LFS-6.5 (-svn, actually), and I can't make it boot. I've done the same in two machines, an old athlon amd and a pentium-iv. Kernel builds fine in both systems, but none of them can boot. The error is the same, VFS can't find a valid root system, "please add a valid root option". I