On Friday 25 March 2011 17:39:02 Mike McCarty wrote:
> Neal Murphy wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 March 2011 17:10:52 Mike McCarty wrote:
> >> Why do you say that? IME, most of the time is spent in the
> >> compiler, not reading the CD-ROM. It takes a few seconds to
> >> read the CD-ROM to get the compil
Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 March 2011 17:10:52 Mike McCarty wrote:
>> Why do you say that? IME, most of the time is spent in the
>> compiler, not reading the CD-ROM. It takes a few seconds to
>> read the CD-ROM to get the compiler going, and then it runs.
>> Usually, most of it gets cached.
On Tuesday 22 March 2011 17:10:52 Mike McCarty wrote:
> Why do you say that? IME, most of the time is spent in the
> compiler, not reading the CD-ROM. It takes a few seconds to
> read the CD-ROM to get the compiler going, and then it runs.
> Usually, most of it gets cached.
Only if you have enough
to detect
>> some devices such as some SATA hard drives.""
>>
>> shall i use for lfslivecd as host or use any linux destro
>
> Really you can use any distro, but you may have to ensure the
> prerequisite packages are installed. The lfs live CD is already set up
hard drives.""
>
> shall i use for lfslivecd as host or use any linux destro
Really you can use any distro, but you may have to ensure the
prerequisite packages are installed. The lfs live CD is already set up
for you if it boots OK.
Note that building off any live C
i am using lfs livex86-r2160 as host for building lfs book 6.7,
in lfs6.7 book the following msg was there
""The LFS LiveCD might not work on newer hardware configurations,
failing to boot or failing to detect
some devices such as some SATA hard drives.""
shall i use for lfsl
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Danny Engelbarts wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why i got this error, searching it on google i only got 4 hits
> which leades me to believe it's rather rare ... i must add that, allthough i
> used gcc-4.1.2 for my toolchain, i decided to use 4.2.2 in step 6.12
On Sunday 21 October 2007 00:47:18 Bauke Jan Douma wrote:
> Danny Engelbarts wrote on 21-10-07 00:10:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While building perl on my system with the x86_64-6.3-r2014 livecd i got
> > the following error:
> >
> > make: *** No rule to make target `', needed by
> > `miniperlmain.o'. Stop.
>
Danny Engelbarts wrote on 21-10-07 00:10:
> Hi,
>
> While building perl on my system with the x86_64-6.3-r2014 livecd i got the
> following error:
>
> make: *** No rule to make target `', needed by
> `miniperlmain.o'.
> Stop.
>
> I was able to resolve this error using the patch in this mail;
Hi,
While building perl on my system with the x86_64-6.3-r2014 livecd i got the
following error:
make: *** No rule to make target `', needed by `miniperlmain.o'.
Stop.
I was able to resolve this error using the patch in this mail;
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2006/11/msg
On 4/11/07, Sherzod Rakh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is file in lfs live cd root.ext2. How can i build like root.ext2 file
> my lfs system???
I didn't checked it out, so correct me if i'm wrong...
The root.ext2 file is a filesystem in a file, to create such system
you could use dd
dd if
On 4/12/07, prdcomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Recently, I did an experiment: I build lfs (using jhalfs) without
> optmizations, and in a spare partition built it subsequently with (mainly)
> the following flags: "-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp". Those are rather common
> options, but the number
there is file in lfs live cd root.ext2. How can i build like root.ext2 file
my lfs system???
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
13 matches
Mail list logo
