On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:01:31PM -0500, Mike Hollis wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 04:28:02PM -0500, Neal Murphy wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 December 2010 12:22:05 Mike Hollis wrote:
> > > ... but I don't know how to call this core
> > > with gdb (gdb make core ? gdb gcc core ?) and even if I did
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 04:28:02PM -0500, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 December 2010 12:22:05 Mike Hollis wrote:
> > ... but I don't know how to call this core
> > with gdb (gdb make core ? gdb gcc core ?) and even if I did it would
> > probably not be useful for me.
>
> "gdb fail31-frag.exe
On Tuesday 21 December 2010 12:22:05 Mike Hollis wrote:
> ... but I don't know how to call this core
> with gdb (gdb make core ? gdb gcc core ?) and even if I did it would
> probably not be useful for me.
"gdb fail31-frag.exe core" is probably what will work, ifyou can find the
fail31-frag progra
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:27:09PM -0500, Mike Hollis wrote:
> I started a new jhalfs build last night and it failed unexpectedly at
> expect. It was late , so I deferred until this am and started over.
>
> The answer was found accidentally while looking at changelog of the
> Version SVN-201012
I started a new jhalfs build last night and it failed unexpectedly at
expect. It was late , so I deferred until this am and started over.
The answer was found accidentally while looking at changelog of the
Version SVN-20101219 . I updated my jhalfs svn and it went forward and
is compiling 077-g
