On 11/3/05, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/3/05, Doug Ronne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/3/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Right you are. I eventually came to the realization that alfs was not
> > performing the scripts up front correctly and the fixincludes
On 11/3/05, Doug Ronne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/3/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Doug Ronne wrote:
> > > There is a chance this should go to the alfs list since that is where
> > > I first ran into the trouble, but I got the error by hand too. During
> > > the second
On 11/3/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Ronne wrote:
> > There is a chance this should go to the alfs list since that is where
> > I first ran into the trouble, but I got the error by hand too. During
> > the second pass of gcc, I get a bunch of errors and the first error
> >
Doug Ronne wrote:
There is a chance this should go to the alfs list since that is where
I first ran into the trouble, but I got the error by hand too. During
the second pass of gcc, I get a bunch of errors and the first error
that shows up is with /usr/included/gmp.h (a huge pile of syntax
error
There is a chance this should go to the alfs list since that is where
I first ran into the trouble, but I got the error by hand too. During
the second pass of gcc, I get a bunch of errors and the first error
that shows up is with /usr/included/gmp.h (a huge pile of syntax
errors). Now I didn't th
