RaptorX wrote:
[in answer to my reply]
> while I do agree with you that there will be loads of users hanging around
> there is no security hole as far as I read... from the hint:
I tried to answer your question *as asked*, which was "Why don't
standard distros use this method?" I answered that i
>
> *See above. Most distros are "build once, install many", and the separate
> user technique is not very suited to that. For one thing, it overloads
> something which is not intended for that kind of work, namely, the
> password user authentication system. It would mean that the distro would
> co
RaptorX wrote:
> Hi guys...
>
> I made it without troubles to chapter 6.3 of LFS [6.4].
> Here we are talking about package management. It briefly describes different
> types of systems, I like particularly the user-based one even though I am
> not sure if I have to create or download a script tha
ng to suggest a possible solution that might be a better
fit to your needs.
-Original Message-
From: lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] On Behalf Of Ken Moffat
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:25 PM
To: LFS Support List
Subject:
2009/7/23 RaptorX :
> And
>
> if you have to choose which of this would be your choice and why:
>
> --User Based Management
>
> --Creating Package Archives
>
> --Tracing Installation Scripts
>
> --Symlink Style Package Management
>
Way back when, some of us (well, me at least!) were driven to
And
if you have to choose which of this would be your choice and why:
--User Based Management
--Creating Package Archives
--Tracing Installation Scripts
--Symlink Style Package Management
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:13 PM, RaptorX wrote:
> Hi guys...
>
> I made it without troubles to chap
Hi guys...
I made it without troubles to chapter 6.3 of LFS [6.4].
Here we are talking about package management. It briefly describes different
types of systems, I like particularly the user-based one even though I am
not sure if I have to create or download a script that uses that kind of
system
