Re: binutils [II]

2011-08-06 Thread William Immendorf
FYI: It really helps if you actually understand us and the list, and the book. On Aug 6, 2011 2:58 PM, "Bill Cunningham" wrote: >Mixing versions? What is FBBG? > FBBG = Follow Book, Book Good I said you were mixing versions because you were building Glibc 2.13 (LFS 6.8) with Binutils 2.17 (L

Re: binutils [II]

2011-08-06 Thread Bill Cunningham
William Immendorf wrote: >> On Aug 6, 2011 1:45 AM, "Bill Cunningham" >> wrote: >>> >>>The latest LFS livecd has binutils 2.17 which is require to build >>> glibc-2.13 but when I try to run the configure script it tells me >>> that the assembler is too old? Huh? >> And this is why we build o

Re: binutils [II]

2011-08-06 Thread William Immendorf
On Aug 6, 2011 1:45 AM, "Bill Cunningham" wrote: > >The latest LFS livecd has binutils 2.17 which is require to build > glibc-2.13 but when I try to run the configure script it tells me that the > assembler is too old? Huh? And this is why we build our own copies of Binutils and GCC before Gli

binutils [II]

2011-08-05 Thread Bill Cunningham
The latest LFS livecd has binutils 2.17 which is require to build glibc-2.13 but when I try to run the configure script it tells me that the assembler is too old? Huh? B -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscrib